Screening patients for unintentional carbon monoxide exposure in the Emergency Department: a cross-sectional multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Low-level exposure to carbon monoxide (CO) is a significant health concern but is difficult to diagnose. This main study aim was to establish the prevalence of low-level CO poisoning in Emergency Department (ED) patients. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of patients with symptoms of CO exposure was conducted in four UK EDs between December 2018 and March 2020. Data on symptoms, a CO screening tool and carboxyhaemoglobin were collected. An investigation of participants' homes was undertaken to identify sources of CO exposure. RESULTS: Based on an ED assessment of 4175 participants, the prevalence of suspected CO exposure was 0.62% (95% CI; 0.41-0.91%). CO testing in homes confirmed 1 case of CO presence and 21 probable cases. Normal levels of carboxyhaemoglobin were found in 19 cases of probable exposure and in the confirmed case. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that ED patients with symptoms suggestive of CO poisoning but no history of CO exposure are at risk from CO poisoning. The findings suggest components of the CO screening tool may be an indicator of CO exposure over and above elevated COHb. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for CO exposure so that this important diagnosis is not missed.

Carbon monoxide neurotoxicity is triggered by oxidative stress induced by ROS production from three distinct cellular sources.

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is one of the leading causes of toxic mortality and morbidity. We have studied the generation of reactive oxygen species in cortical neurons in culture in response to toxic doses of CO exposure. Fluorescence microscopy was used to measure the rate of free radical generation, lipid peroxidation, GSH level and also mitochondrial metabolism. We have found that toxic concentrations of CO released from CORM-401 induced mitochondrial depolarisation and inhibition of NADH dependent respiration to a lesser degree than when compared to ischaemia. Energy collapse was not observed within 40 min of CO exposure. We have found that CO induces the generation of reactive oxygen species resulting in lipid peroxidation and a decrease in GSH via three different mechanisms: from mitochondria during the first minutes of CO exposure, from xanthine oxidase at around 20 min exposure due to energy deprivation, and considerable ROS production from NADPH oxidase in the post CO exposure period (re-oxygenation). Inhibition of these different phases with mitochondrial antioxidants, inhibitors of xanthine oxidase, or NADPH oxidase, protected neurons and astrocytes against CO-induced oxidative stress and cell death. The most profound effect was seen during NADPH oxidase inhibition. Thus, oxidative stress has a remarkably significant role in CO-induced neuronal cell death and preventing its occurrence during reoxygenation is of great importance in the consideration of a positive, neurologically protective therapeutic outcome for CO exposed patients.

Impact of climate change on the domestic indoor environment and associated health risks in the UK.

There is growing evidence that projected climate change has the potential to significantly affect public health. In the UK, much of this impact is likely to arise by amplifying existing risks related to heat exposure, flooding, and chemical and biological contamination in buildings. Identifying the health effects of climate change on the indoor environment, and risks and opportunities related to climate change adaptation and mitigation, can help protect public health. We explored a range of health risks in the domestic indoor environment related to climate change, as well as the potential health benefits and unintended harmful effects of climate change mitigation and adaptation policies in the UK housing sector. We reviewed relevant scientific literature, focusing on housing-related health effects in the UK likely to arise through either direct or indirect mechanisms of climate change or mitigation and adaptation measures in the built environment. We considered the following categories of effect: (i) indoor temperatures, (ii) indoor air quality, (iii) indoor allergens and infections, and (iv) flood damage and water contamination. Climate change may exacerbate health risks and inequalities across these categories and in a variety of ways, if adequate adaptation measures are not taken. Certain changes to the indoor environment can affect indoor air quality or promote the growth and propagation of pathogenic organisms. Measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions have the potential for ancillary public health benefits including reductions in health burdens related heat and cold, indoor exposure to air pollution derived from outdoor sources, and mould growth. However, increasing airtightness of dwellings in pursuit of energy efficiency could also have negative effects by increasing concentrations of pollutants (such as PM2.5, CO and radon) derived from indoor or ground sources, and biological contamination. These effects can largely be ameliorated by mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) and air filtration, where such solution is feasible and when the system is properly installed, operated and maintained. Groups at high risk of these adverse health effects include the elderly (especially those living on their own), individuals with pre-existing illnesses, people living in overcrowded accommodation, and the socioeconomically deprived. A better understanding of how current and emerging building infrastructure design, construction, and materials may affect health in the context of climate change and mitigation and adaptation measures is needed in the UK and other high income countries. Long-term, energy efficient building design interventions, ensuring adequate ventilation, need to be promoted.

Will drivers for home energy efficiency harm occupant health?

The U.K. government has committed to an 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050, with housing accounting for 27% of total current emissions. There are several drivers both to reduce emissions from homes and to reduce fuel poverty, promoting a range of building and behavioural measures in homes. The health benefits of warmer homes in winter have been described, but there has been less consideration of the potential negative impacts of some of these measures. We examine the changes in U.K. homes, and the possible consequences for health. The main concerns for health surround the potential for poor indoor air quality if ventilation is insufficient and the possible risks of overheating in heatwave conditions. This paper notes a limited evidence base and the need for further research on the health effects of energy-efficient homes, particularly with regard to ventilation.