Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil ; 73(2): 43-52, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780505

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To quantify typical disease characteristics for patients with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) including pre-and post-surgical ocular alignment and head positioning as well as average improvement with surgical intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This investigation is a systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies detailing surgical intervention in cohorts of individuals with CFEOM were included. Ocular alignment and head positioning before and after surgery was recorded. Meta-analyses were performed to quantify these findings along with other patient characteristics across all included studies. RESULTS: The estimated average improvement in vertical alignment for patients with unilateral and bilateral CFEOM was 34.8 pd (prism diopters) and 21.27 pd, respectively. For horizontal alignment, patients with unilateral and bilateral CFEOM improved an average of 25.39 pd and 10.99 pd after surgery, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two most common surgeries used to address hypotropia and blepharoptosis in this patient population. The estimated proportion of patients with post-surgical head alignment within 5-9° was 60.64% and was 28.25% for patients with<5° of alignment. CONCLUSION: This study was able to illuminate many characteristic features of patients with CFEOM. Surgical intervention for the ocular alignment and head positioning of these patients demonstrates promising utility.


Assuntos
Oftalmoplegia , Estrabismo , Humanos , Músculos Oculomotores/cirurgia , Músculos Oculomotores/patologia , Oftalmoplegia/cirurgia , Estrabismo/congênito , Fibrose
2.
Orbit ; 42(1): 1-10, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942566

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to determine if a certain revision DCR approach (external, endoscopic endonasal, laser transcanalicular) is superior to others. Additionally, this investigation evaluates the effect of the primary surgery on success of revision. METHODS: This investigation is a systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies specifying type of primary DCR and revision DCR were included. Proportion of successes of each revision for every primary surgery was obtained from the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed to determine cumulative proportions of successes across studies. OUTCOME MEASURES: Significant differences in the proportions yielded by meta-analysis of successes among different surgical approaches. RESULTS: The type of primary surgery did not significantly influence overall revision success if the same procedure was used for the revision. Overall successes per each revision type were not significantly different. When performing subgroup analyses per each primary surgery, all methods of revisions were similar in efficacy with one exception: when the primary surgery was done using the laser transcanalicular approach, external revision outperformed repetition of the primary method. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding success of re-operation, surgeons can use the method they are most comfortable with to perform DCR revisions. However, primary transcanalicular laser DCRs should be revised, if necessary, using the external approach.


Assuntos
Dacriocistorinostomia , Terapia a Laser , Ducto Nasolacrimal , Humanos , Dacriocistorinostomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Endoscopia , Reoperação , Ducto Nasolacrimal/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect ; 12(1): 39, 2022 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396863

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to determine if certain aspects of endophthalmitis prophylaxis strategies are superior to others. DESIGN: This investigation is a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: All studies specifying a type of prophylaxis strategy and resulting rates of endophthalmitis were included. Time course, method of administration, and antibiotic regimen, and confounding factors were collected and included for meta-regression. RESULTS: Time courses greater than 24 h did not significantly improve outcomes. Likewise, intraocular and/or intravenous antibiotic administration methods did not significantly outperform oral administration. No antibiotic regimens performed differently from vancomycin/ ≥ 3rd generation cephalosporin except for ciprofloxacin monotherapy which yielded significantly worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Future antibiotic strategies should strongly consider the risks of antibiotic treatment > 24 h and administration methods other than the oral antibiotic forms. In addition, providers should be wary of using ciprofloxacin monotherapy for endophthalmitis prophylaxis when treating open globe injuries.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...