Talocalcaneal coalition classifications: A critical analysis review and suggested new classification system with implications for treatment.

Talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC) is the second most frequent tarsal coalition reported. Our aim was to review talocalcaneal coalition classifications and to propose a new classification emphasizing a therapeutic approach. None of the classifications described for TCC mention the presence of flatfoot or valgus hindfoot, which are the key elements when defining the optimal treatment of this disease. We defined five clinical and radiological factors that would guide the choice of surgical treatment and based on these, we proposed a new classification system.

Managing the Severe Cavus Foot Deformity in Global Humanitarian Programs.

The cavus foot represents a complex spectrum of deformity ranging from the subtle idiopathic to the severe sensorimotor neuropathy and other neuromuscular deformities. The successful surgical treatment of the cavus foot depends on a fundamental understanding of the underlying multiplanar deformity, inherent muscle balance, and the rigidity of the hindfoot. The location of the deformity is described and understood according to its multiple apices. These deformities are addressed with osteotomies or arthrodesis directed at the apices of deformity. Simultaneously, correction of muscular imbalances with appropriate tendon transfers must also be performed to prevent recurrent deformity. With these principles in mind, the surgical correction of the cavus foot becomes simplified and algorithmically driven.

Ligament augmentation repair is broadly applied across different orthopaedic subspecialities: an ISAKOS international survey of orthopaedic surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how ligament augmentation repair (LAR) techniques are currently used in different anatomic regions in orthopaedic sports medicine, and to identify the most common indications and limitations of LAR. METHODS: We sent survey invitations to 4,000 members of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine society. The survey consisted of 37 questions total, with members only receiving some branching questions specific to their area of specialisation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the significance between groups was evaluated using chi-square tests of independence. RESULTS: Of 515 surveys received, 502 were complete and included for the analysis (97% completion rate). 27% of respondents report from Europe, 26% South America, 23% Asia, 15% North America, 5.2% Oceania, and 3.4% Africa. 75% of all survey respondents report using LAR, most frequently using it for the anterior talofibular ligament ( 69%), acromioclavicular joint ( 58%), and the anterior cruciate ligament (51%). Surgeons in Asia report using LAR the most (80%), and surgeons in Africa the least (59%). LAR is most commonly indicated for additional stability (72%), poor tissue quality (54%), and more rapid return-to-play (47%). LAR users state their greatest limitation is cost (62%), while non-LAR users state their greatest reason not to use LAR is that patients do well without it (46%). We also find that the frequency of LAR use among surgeons may differ based on practice characteristics and training. For example, surgeons who treat athletes at the professional or Olympic level are significantly more likely to have a high annual use of LAR (20+ cases) compared to surgeons that treat only recreational athletes (45% and 25%, respectively, p â€‹= â€‹0.005). CONCLUSION: LAR is broadly applied in orthopaedics but its rate of use is not homogeneous. Outcomes and perceived benefits vary depending on factors such as surgeon specialty and treatment population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: An acute Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common sports injuries, affecting 18 per 100,000 persons, and its operative repair has been evolving and increasing in frequency since the mid-1900s. Traditionally, open surgical repair has provided improved functional outcomes, reduced rerupture rates, and a quicker recovery and return to activities at the expense of increased wound complications such as infections and skin necrosis compared with nonoperative management. In 1977, Ma and Griffith introduced the percutaneous approach, and over the following decades, multiple improved techniques, and modifications thereof, have been described with comparable outcomes with open repair. PURPOSE: The current study aimed to provide updated level 1 evidence comparing open repair with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) through a comprehensive search of the literature published in English, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, and German while avoiding limitations of previous studies such as heterogeneous study designs and a small number of included trials. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 2 independent team members searched several databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing open repair and MIS of Achilles tendon ruptures. The primary outcomes were (1) functional outcomes, (2) reruptures, (3) sural nerve injuries, and (4) infections (deep/superficial), whereas the secondary outcomes were (1) skin complications, (2) adhesions, (3) other complications, (4) ankle range of motion, and (5) surgical time. RESULTS: There were 10 RCTs that qualified for the meta-analysis with a total of 522 patients. Overall, 260 (49.8%) patients underwent open repair, while 262 (50.2%) underwent MIS. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 94.8 and 95.7 for open repair and MIS, respectively, with a nonsignificant difference (mean difference [MD], -0.73 [95% CI, -1.70 to 0.25]; P = .14; I2 = 0%). The pooled mean total complication rate was 15.5% (0%-36.4%) for open repair and 10.4% (0%-45.5%) for MIS, with a nonsignificant statistical difference (odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95% CI, 0.87-2.57]; P = .14; I2 = 40%). The mean rerupture rate was 2.5% (0%-6.8%) for open repair versus 1.5% (0%-4.6%) for MIS, with a nonsignificant statistical difference (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 0.42-5.70]; P = .50; I2 = 0%). No cases of sural nerve injuries were reported in the open repair group. The mean sural nerve injury rate was 3.4% (0%-7.3%) in the MIS group, which was statistically significant (OR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.03-0.46]; P = .02; I2 = 0%). The mean overall superficial infection rate was 6.0% (0%-18.2%) and 0.4% (0%-4.5%) for open repair and MIS, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (OR, 5.70 [95% CI, 1.80-18.02]; P < .001; I2 = 0%). The mean overall deep infection rate reported in the open repair group was 1.4% (0%-5.0%), while no deep infection was reported in the MIS group, with no statistically significant difference (OR, 3.14 [95% CI, 0.48-20.54]; P = .23; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences between the open repair and MIS groups in the skin necrosis and dehiscence rate, adhesion rate, or keloid scar rate. The mean surgical time was 51.0 and 29.7 minutes for open repair and MIS, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (MD, 21.13 [95% CI, 15.50-26.75]; P < .001; I2 = 15%). CONCLUSION: Open Achilles tendon repair was associated with a longer surgical time, higher risk of superficial infections, and higher risk of ankle stiffness, while MIS was associated with a greater risk of temporary sural nerve palsy. The rerupture rate and functional outcomes were mostly equivalent. We found MIS to be a safe and reliable technique. However, high-quality standardized RCTs are still needed before recommending MIS as the gold standard for managing Achilles tendon ruptures.

Surgical Management of the Undercorrected and Overcorrected Severe Club Foot Deformity.

Managing complications of clubfoot deformities can be very challenging. Some patients present with recurrent clubfoot and residual symptoms, and some present with overcorrection leading to a severe complex flatfoot deformity. Both can lead to long-term degenerative changes of the foot and ankle joints owing to deformity caused by unbalanced loading. This article only focuses on severe complications caused by recurrence and overcorrection in both children and adult patients.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) Classification.

BACKGROUND: A consensus group recently proposed the term progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) and a new classification with 2 stages plus 5 classes to describe the complex array of flatfoot deformities. This study aimed to validate different diagnostic accuracy rates of the PCFD classification. METHODS: This was a survey-based study distributed among 13 foot and ankle fellowship programs for 3 groups of participants with varied experience in practice (group 1: fellows in training, group 2: surgeons in practice for 1-4 years, and group 3: surgeons in practice for ≥5 years). Each participant was asked to assign 20 different cases of flatfoot deformity to the appropriate classes and stages using the PCFD classification. The overall diagnostic accuracy, class, and stage diagnostic accuracy rates for the 20 cases were calculated first for the entire cohort and then compared among the 3 groups. The misdiagnosis rate for each class of deformity (the sum of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis rates) of the entire cohort was calculated and compared with the other classes. Mean and standard evidence were used to describe numerical data. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare values among the 3 groups and the 5 classes. P <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: For the whole cohort, the overall diagnostic accuracy, class diagnostic accuracy, and stage diagnostic accuracy rates were 71.0%, 78.3%, and 81.7%, respectively There was a statistically significant difference between group 1 and 2, and group 1 and 3, in overall diagnostic accuracy and class diagnostic accuracy, with no significant difference among the 3 groups regarding stage diagnostic accuracy. Class B had a significantly higher overdiagnosis rate than the rest of the classes, whereas class D was significantly underdiagnosed than others. The misdiagnosis rates for classes A to E were 3.3%, 17.5%, 11.1%, 26.0%, and 3.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The PCFD classification showed overall fair diagnostic accuracy rates. The highest diagnostic accuracy was for "hindfoot valgus deformity" and "ankle instability." Further content validation of the PCFD classification is needed to examine the terminology and interpretation of those classes with low diagnostic accuracy including "midfoot/forefoot abduction deformity," "forefoot varus deformity/medial column instability," and "peritalar subluxation/dislocation."Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the New Classification System of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Historical concept of flatfoot as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) has been questioned. Recently, the consensus group published a new classification system and recommended renaming PTTD to Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). The new PCFD classification could be effective in providing comprehensive information on the deformity. To date, there has been no study reporting intra- and interobserver reliability and the frequency of each class in PCFD classification. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted from prospectively collected registry data. A consecutive cohort of PCFD patients evaluated from February 2015 to October 2020 was included, consisting of 92 feet in 84 patients. Classification of each patient was made using characteristic clinical and radiographic findings by 3 independent observers. Frequencies of each class and subclass were assessed. Intraobserver and inteobserver reliabilities were analyzed with Cohen kappa and Fleiss kappa, respectively. RESULTS: Mean sample age was 54.4, 38% was male and 62% were female. 1ABC (25.4%) was the most common subclass, followed by 1AC (8.7%) and 1ABCD (6.9%). Only a small percentage of patients had isolated deformity. Class A was the most frequent component (89.5%), followed by C in 86.2% of the cases. Moderate interobserver reliability (Fleiss kappa = 0.561, P < .001, 95% CI 0.528-0.594) was found for overall classification. Very good intraobserver reliability was found (Cohen kappa = 0.851, P < .001, 95% CI 0.777-0.926). CONCLUSION: Almost half (49.3%) of patients had a presentation dominantly involving the hindfoot (A) with various combinations of midfoot and/or forefoot deformity (B), (C) with or without subtalar joint involvement (D). The new system may cover all possible combinations of the PCFD, providing a comprehensive description and guiding treatment in a systematic and individualized manner, but this initial study suggests an opportunity to improve overall interobserver reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective diagnostic study.

An Approach to the Management of Severe Clubfoot Deformities on Global Humanitarian Programs: The Role of Talectomy.

The approach to treatment of severe untreated or recurrent congenital talipes equinovarus deformities is very different in the world where patients are mobile, have access to repeated return visits for follow-up treatment, and where more sophisticated options for gradual correction with external fixation are available. For treatment, talectomy may be the only option to treat certain neglected clubfoot deformities during humanitarian programs and it may still have to be used as a salvage procedure used in modern foot surgery. Our extensive experience with these deformities has been on global humanitarian programs.

Management of Complex Tarsal Coalition in Children.

Complex tarsal coalition includes extensive talocalcaneal coalition, double or triple coalition, coalition with severe hindfoot deformities, or coalition with a ball-and-socket ankle deformity. Careful preoperative physical examination including diagnostic injection is important in treatment planning. Both radiographic examination and computed tomographic scan that involve not only the foot but also the ankle are necessary to analyze the location and size of the coalitions, determining the presence of arthritis in the involved or adjacent joints, and if there are any deformities including a ball-and-socket ankle, which is frequently associated with complex tarsal coalitions.

Titrating the Amount of Bony Correction in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: There is evidence indicating that the amount of bony correction performed in the setting of progressive collapsing foot deformity reconstructive surgery can be titrated within a recommended range for a variety of procedures. The typical range when performing a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy should be 7 to 15 mm of medialization of the tuberosity. The typical range when performing an Evans lateral column lengthening should be 5 to 10 mm of a laterally based wedge in the anterior calcaneus. The typical range when performing a plantarflexion opening wedge osteotomy of the medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy should be 5 to 10 mm of a dorsal wedge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Consensus for the Indication of a Medializing Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy in the Treatment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: There is evidence that the medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) can be effective in treating the progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). This juxta-articular osteotomy of the tuberosity shifts the mechanical axis of the calcaneus from a more lateral position to a more medial position, which provides mechanical advantage in the reconstruction for this condition. This also shifts the action of the Achilles tendon medially, which minimizes the everting deforming effect and improves the inversion forces. When isolated hindfoot valgus exists with adequate talonavicular joint coverage (less than 35%-40% uncoverage) and a lack of significant forefoot supination, varus, or abduction, we recommend performing this osteotomy as an isolated bony procedure, with or without additional soft tissue procedures. The clinical goal of the hindfoot valgus correction is to achieve a clinically neutral heel, as defined by a vertical axis from the heel up the longitudinal axis of the Achilles tendon and distal aspect of the leg. The typical range when performing a MDCO, while considering the location and rotation of the osteotomy, is 7 to 15 mm of correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Classification and Nomenclature: Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: The historical nomenclature for the adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is confusing, at times called posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD), the adult flexible flatfoot deformity, posterior tibial tendon rupture, peritalar instability and peritalar subluxation (PTS), and progressive talipes equinovalgus. Many but not all of these deformities are associated with a rupture of the posterior tibial tendon (PTT), and some of these are associated with deformities either primarily or secondarily in the midfoot or ankle. There is similar inconsistency with the use of classification schemata for these deformities, and from the first introduced by Johnson and Strom (1989), and then modified by Myerson (1997), there have been many attempts to provide a more comprehensive classification system. However, although these newer more complete classification systems have addressed some of the anatomic variations of deformities encountered, none of the above have ever been validated. The proposed system better incorporates the most recent data and understanding of the condition and better allows for standardization of reporting. In light of this information, the consensus group proposes the adoption of the nomenclature "Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity" (PCFD) and a new classification system aiming at summarizing recent data published on the subject and to standardize data reporting regarding this complex 3-dimensional deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion. CONSENSUS STATEMENTS VOTED: CONSENSUS STATEMENT ONE: We will rename the condition to Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD), a complex 3-dimensional deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and midfoot varus.Delegate vote: agree, 100% (9/9); disagree, 0%; abstain, 0%.(Unanimous, strongest consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT TWO: Our current classification systems are incomplete or outdated.Delegate vote: agree, 100% (9/9); disagree, 0%; abstain, 0%.(Unanimous, strongest consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT THREE: MRI findings should be part of a new classification system.Delegate vote: agree, 33% (3/9); disagree, 67% (6/9); abstain, 0%.(Weak negative consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT FOUR: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) findings should be part of a new classification system.Delegate vote: agree, 56% (5/9); disagree, 44% (4/9); abstain, 0%.(Weak consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT FIVE: A new classification system is proposed and should be used to stage the deformity clinically and to define treatment.Delegate vote: agree, 89% (8/9); abstain, 11% (1/9).(Strong consensus).

Consensus on Indications for Medial Cuneiform Opening Wedge (Cotton) Osteotomy in the Treatment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: Forefoot varus is a physical and radiographic examination finding associated with the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). Varus position of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot is caused by medial midfoot collapse with apex plantar angulation of the medial column. Some surgeons use the term forefoot supination to describe this same deformity (see Introduction section with nomenclature). Correction of this deformity is important to restore the weightbearing tripod of the foot and help resist a recurrence of foot collapse. When the forefoot varus deformity is isolated to the medial metatarsal and medial cuneiform, correction is indicated with an opening wedge medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy, typically with interposition of an allograft bone wedge from 5 to 11 mm in width at the base. When the forefoot varus is global, involving varus angulation of the entire forefoot and midfoot relative to the hindfoot, other procedures are needed to adequately correct the deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Consensus on Goals for Operative Correction.

RECOMMENDATION: In the treatment of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), the combination of bone shape, soft tissue failure, and host factors create a complex algorithm that may confound choices for operative treatment. Realignment and balancing are primary goals. There was consensus that preservation of joint motion is preferred when possible. This choice needs to be balanced with the need for performing joint-sacrificing procedures such as fusions to obtain and maintain correction. In addition, a patient's age and health status such as body mass index is important to consider. Although preservation of motion is important, it is secondary to a stable and properly aligned foot. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Consensus on Indications for Isolated Subtalar Joint Fusion and Naviculocuneiform Fusions for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: Peritalar subluxation represents an important hindfoot component of progressive collapsing foot deformity, which can be associated with a breakdown of the medial longitudinal arch. It results in a complex 3-dimensional deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and pronation. Loss of peritalar stability allows the talus to rotate and translate on the calcaneal and navicular bone surfaces, typically moving medially and anteriorly, which may result in sinus tarsi and subfibular impingement. The onset of degenerative disease can manifest with stiffening of the subtalar (ST) joint and subsequent fixed and possibly arthritic deformity. While ST joint fusion may permit repositioning and stabilization of the talus on top of the calcaneus, it may not fully correct forefoot abduction and it does not correct forefoot varus. Such varus may be addressed by a talonavicular (TN) fusion or a plantar flexion osteotomy of the first ray, but, if too pronounced, it may be more effectively corrected with a naviculocuneiform (NC) fusion. The NC joint has a curvature in the sagittal plane. Thus, preserving the shape of the joint is the key to permitting plantarflexion correction by rotating the midfoot along the debrided surfaces and to fix it. Intraoperatively, care must be also taken to not overcorrect the talocalcaneal angle in the horizontal plane during the ST fusion (eg, to exceed the external rotation of the talus and inadvertently put the midfoot in a supinated position). Such overcorrection can lead to lateral column overload with persistent lateral midfoot pain and discomfort. A contraindication for an isolated ST fusion may be a rupture of posterior tibial tendon because of the resultant loss of the internal rotation force at the TN joint. In these cases, a flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer is added to the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Indications for Deltoid and Spring Ligament Reconstruction in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: There is evidence supporting medial soft tissue reconstruction, such as spring and deltoid ligament reconstructions, in the treatment of severe progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). We recommend spring ligament reconstruction to be considered in addition to lateral column lengthening or subtalar fusion at the initial operation when those procedures have given at least 50% correction but inadequate correction of the severe flexible subluxation of the talonavicular and subtalar joints. We also recommend combined flatfoot reconstruction and deltoid reconstruction be considered as a joint sparing alternative in the presence of PCFD with valgus deformity of the ankle joint if there is 50% or more of the lateral joint space remaining. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Consensus for the Indication of Lateral Column Lengthening in the Treatment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex 3D deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and midfoot supination. Although a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy can correct heel valgus, it has far less ability to correct forefoot abduction. More severe forefoot abduction, most frequently measured preoperatively by assessing talonavicular coverage on an anteroposterior (AP) weightbearing conventional radiographic view of the foot, can be more effectively corrected with a lateral column lengthening procedure than by other osteotomies in the foot. Care must be taken intraoperatively to not overcorrect the deformity by restricting passive eversion of the subtalar joint or causing adduction at the talonavicular joint on simulated AP weightbearing fluoroscopic imaging. Overcorrection can lead to lateral column overload with persistent lateral midfoot pain. The typical amount of lengthening of the lateral column is between 5 and 10 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion. CONSENSUS STATEMENT ONE: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) procedure is recommended when the amount of talonavicular joint uncoverage is above 40%. The amount of lengthening needed in the lateral column should be judged intraoperatively by the amount of correction of the uncoverage and by adequate residual passive eversion range of motion of the subtalar joint.Delegate vote: agree, 78% (7/9); disagree, 11% (1/9); abstain, 11% (1/9).(Strong consensus). CONSENSUS STATEMENT TWO: When titrating the amount of correction of abduction deformity intraoperatively, the presence of adduction at the talonavicular joint on simulated weightbearing fluoroscopic imaging is an important sign of hypercorrection and higher risk for lateral column overload.Delegate vote: agree, 100% (9/9); disagree, 0%; abstain, 0%.(Unanimous, strongest consensus). CONSENSUS STATEMENT THREE: The typical range for performing a lateral column lengthening is between 5 and 10 mm to achieve an adequate amount of talonavicular coverage.Delegate vote: agree, 100% (9/9); disagree, 0%; abstain, 0%.(Unanimous, strongest consensus).

Consensus for the Use of Weightbearing CT in the Assessment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

RECOMMENDATION: There is evidence that the use of WEIGHTBEARING imaging aids in the assessment of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). The following WEIGHTBEARING conventional radiographs (CRs) are necessary in the assessment of PCFD patients: anteroposterior (AP) foot, AP or mortise ankle, and lateral foot. If available, a hindfoot alignment view is strongly recommended. If available, WEIGHTBEARING computed tomography (CT) is strongly recommended for surgical planning. When WEIGHTBEARING CT is obtained, important findings to be assessed are sinus tarsi impingement, subfibular impingement, increased valgus inclination of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint, and subluxation of the subtalar joint at the posterior and/or middle facet. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Excision of a Middle Facet Tarsal Coalition.

Middle facet tarsal coalition is one of the commonly seen tarsal coalitions in clinical practice that can cause pain and associated flatfoot deformity. Excision of the coalition is one of the treatment options for symptomatic cases. Although symptoms may subside in children following a period of immobilization, resection should be considered as a treatment alternative for children and adolescents because of the potential for restoration of subtalar joint movement. The indications for excision of the coalition are not consistently reported in the literature, and the procedure is not always easy to perform. In this article, we describe the steps for a successful excision of a middle facet tarsal coalition. DESCRIPTION: The incision is marked from 1 cm inferior to the medial malleolus, extending distally to the navicular tuberosity and inferior to the level of the posterior tibial tendon. The coalition is first located by retracting the flexor tendons and the neurovascular bundle. The bone on the surface of the coalition is gradually removed to expose the middle facet. A 2-mm guide pin and a cannulated dilator probe inserted through the sinus tarsi into the tarsal canal that exits anterior to the posterior facet help with identifying the margins of the coalition. The middle facet is then removed either partially or totally, depending on the size, shape, and location of the coalition, until the posterior facet is visualized. Following excision, bone wax is used on the exposed surfaces or fat is inserted to prevent adhesion and recurrent bone formation. If there is an associated flatfoot deformity, additional surgeries, including a medial translational osteotomy or a lateral column lengthening of the calcaneus, a Cotton osteotomy, an arthroereisis, or a calcaneus stop procedure, may be necessary. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative treatment for managing a middle facet coalition is immobilization of the foot in a boot or cast for 6 to 8 weeks to decrease pain. This will not improve the function of the hindfoot, which remains stiff, but may alleviate pain temporarily. Excision of the coalition in combination with other procedures for correction of the flatfoot is an alternative to an arthrodesis of the subtalar joint and works well in children and adolescents, particularly in those with reasonable subtalar joint flexibility. A triple arthrodesis is rarely performed for an isolated middle facet coalition, even in adults, unless there is peritalar arthritis and more severe abduction of the talonavicular joint with associated stiffness. RATIONALE: The rationale for excision of a middle facet tarsal coalition is to maximize the mobility of the hindfoot, in particular, the subtalar joint. The success of excision of the coalition is associated with the rigidity of the hindfoot and the presence of a flatfoot deformity. The stiffer the hindfoot and the flatter the foot, the less likely is excision of the coalition to be successful. Since the alternative to resection of a middle facet coalition is arthrodesis of the subtalar joint, one must distinguish between feet in which there is mobility, and excision is more likely to be successful, and those that are rigid, for which arthrodesis is preferable. In many feet, however, the size of the coalition is not associated with the flexibility of the hindfoot, and in an extremely rigid hindfoot, we recommend an arthrodesis, even in an adolescent patient. Rigidity increases with increasing age, and it is uncommon to excise the middle facet coalition in adult patients or in a patient in whom subtalar arthritis is evident.