A Protocol for Helicopter In-Cabin Intubation.

OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for prehospital intubation is to avoid intubating in confined spaces. For our helicopter service, this is not always realistic. Operating in a rural region with a subarctic, cold climate, our crews are frequently forced to intubate inside ambulances or in our helicopter. This article describes a protocol for in-cabin intubation and compares it with standard open space conditions. METHODS: Fourteen prehospital physicians were randomized to solve a simplified clinical scenario during which they were to intubate a mannequin either inside the helicopter, in accordance with our in-cabin protocol, or outside on an ambulance stretcher. Participants scored intubating conditions using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Cormack-Lehane classification. The number of intubation attempts was recorded. Three timing end points were also measured. RESULTS: All intubations were successful on the first attempt. All participants reported an optimal glottic view of Cormack-Lehane 1 in both scenario conditions. Participants perceived in-cabin intubation to be less difficult than intubating outdoors. (VAS 1 vs. VAS 2, P = .02). We found no difference in the duration of intubation. Scene time was 53.5 seconds (P = .04) shorter in the in-cabin group. In-cabin intubation delayed the establishment of a secure airway by 63 seconds (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that protocolized in-cabin intubation can be performed in a timely manner under conditions that are equal to or better than when intubating outside on a stretcher with 360-degree patient access. Although delaying the establishment of a secure airway, in-cabin intubation may reduce scene times.

The mission characteristics of a newly implemented rural helicopter emergency medical service.

BACKGROUND: Physician-staffed helicopter emergency services (HEMS) can provide benefit through the delivery of specialist competence and equipment to the prehospital scene and through expedient transport of critically ill patients to specialist care. This paper describes the integration of such a system in a rural Swedish county. METHODS: This is a retrospective database study recording the outcomes of every emergency call centre dispatch request as well as the clinical and operational data from all completed missions during this service's first year in operation. RESULTS: During the study period, HEMS completed 478 missions out of which 405 (84,7%) were primary missions to prehospital settings and 73 (15,3%) were inter-hospital critical care transfers. A majority (55,3%) of primary missions occurred in the regions furthest from our hospitals, in municipalities housing only 15,6% of the county's population. The NACA (IQR) score on primary and secondary missions was 4 (2) and 5 (1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the successful integration of a physician-based air ambulance service in a Scandinavian rural region. Municipalities distant from our hospitals benefitted as they now have access to early specialist intervention and expedient transport to critical hospital care. Our hospitals and most populated areas benefitted from HEMS secondary mission capability as they gained a dedicated ICU transport service that could provide specialist intensive care during rapid inter-hospital transfer.