Personal and Social Functioning and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with the Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Risperidone ISM.

Objective: To analyze the effect of Risperidone ISM on social functioning and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in both short- and long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Patients and Methods: This analysis was based on data from both phases of the PRISMA-3 study, including 433 relapsed patients from the double-blind (DB) phase of the PRISMA-3 trial who were treated for 12-weeks with once-monthly (every 28 days) intramuscular Risperidone ISM 75 mg or 100 mg (n = 288), or placebo (n = 145), as well as 174 patients transitioning from the DB to an open-label 52-week extension (OLE) phase, plus 41 de novo patients treated on a stable maintenance dose of oral risperidone. The clinician-administered Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale and the patient-reported 20-item Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics scale (SWN-20) were used to measure social functioning and HR-QoL outcomes, respectively. Results: Risperidone ISM significantly improved PSP total score from baseline to endpoint (Day 85) versus placebo in the DB phase with mean change total score (95% CI) of 10.7 (9; 12) compared to 4.8 (3; 7) for placebo (p < 0.0001). The statistically significant improvement was present from the first measurement time point (Day 29). SWN-20-measured HR-QoL increased on average in patients treated with Risperidone ISM in the DB phase. A significant improvement was also observed for PSP and SWN-20 scores from the OLE baseline to week 52 for patients transitioning from the DB phase. Stable de novo patients maintained similar PSP and SWN-20 scores during the whole OLE phase. Conclusion: Risperidone ISM provided a rapid and sustained improvement in personal and social functioning, and HR-QOL without need of oral risperidone supplementation or loading doses. These findings, along with a fast onset of efficacy, could contribute to reinforcing the therapeutic alliance and possibly an earlier discharge. Moreover, patient functioning continued improving or was maintained with long-term treatment.

Changing the Antipsychotic in Early Nonimprovers to Amisulpride or Olanzapine: Randomized, Double-Blind Trial in Patients With Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Meta-analyses have shown that the majority of patients with schizophrenia who have not improved after 2 weeks of treatment with an antipsychotic drug are unlikely to fully respond later. We hypothesized that switching to another antipsychotic with a different receptor binding profile is an effective strategy in such a situation. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 327 inpatients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized to double-blind treatment with either olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) or amisulpride (200-800 mg/day). Those patients who had not reached at least 25% Positive-and-Negative-Syndrome-Scale (PANSS) total score reduction from baseline after 2 weeks (the "non-improvers") were rerandomized double-blind to either staying on the same compound ("stayers") or to switching to the other antipsychotic ("switchers") for another 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference in the number of patients in symptomatic remission between the combined "switchers" and the "stayers" after 8 weeks of treatment, analyzed by logistic regression. STUDY RESULTS: A total of 142 nonimprovers were rerandomized at week two. 25 (45.5 %) of the 'stayers' compared to 41 (68.3 %) of the "switchers" reached remission at endpoint (p = .006). Differences in secondary efficacy outcomes were not significant, except for the PANSS negative subscore and the Clinical-Global-Impression-Scale. "Switchers" and "stayers" did not differ in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Switching "non-improvers" from amisulpride to olanzapine or vice-versa increased remission rates and was safe. The superiority in the primary outcome was, however, not paralleled by significant differences in most secondary efficacy outcomes and the effect was only apparent at the last visit making replications of longer duration necessary.

Long-term efficacy and safety of once-monthly Risperidone ISM® in the treatment of schizophrenia: Results from a 12-month open-label extension study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of Risperidone ISM® in patients with schizophrenia, a multicenter, open-label extension of the PRISMA-3 study was conducted. METHODS: Eligible placebo (unstable) and Risperidone ISM® (stabilized) rollover patients from a previous 12-week double-blind phase and de novo stable patients received once-monthly intramuscular injections of Risperidone ISM® 75 or 100 mg for 12 months. The long term-efficacy assessment included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), injection site reactions (ISR), laboratory tests and several safety scales. RESULTS: Altogether, 215 patients entered the study (55 unstable, 119 stabilized and 41 stable patients). Most patients (74.9%) completed, and discontinuation rates were broadly similar across the study subgroups, mainly due to withdrawal of consent (12.1%). PANSS total and subscales scores decreased from baseline to endpoint in all groups, with the largest decrease for unstable patients. Improvement from baseline to 12 months was also shown for CGI-S and CGI-I scores for both unstable and stabilized patients; the CGI-S and CGI-I scores remained almost unchanged for the stable group. At least one treatment-related TEAE was reported in 39.1% of patients; the most common were headache (12.1%), hyperprolactinemia (9.8%) and asthenia (5.1%). ISR were reported in 8 (0.3%) patients; injection site pain score was low across the 2355 doses assessed. CONCLUSION: Risperidone ISM® is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated long-term treatment of schizophrenia in adults, regardless of the initial disease severity or whether patients were previously treated with Risperidone ISM® during an acute exacerbation or switched from stable doses of oral risperidone.

Efficacy and safety of once-monthly Risperidone ISM® in schizophrenic patients with an acute exacerbation.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Risperidone ISM® against placebo in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2018 (NCT03160521). Eligible patients received once-monthly intramuscular injections of Risperidone ISM® (75 or 100 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline to week 12. The key secondary efficacy outcome was change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score. Altogether, 438 patients were randomized (1:1:1) and 390 included in the modified ITT efficacy set. The PANSS total score (mean difference, 95% CI) improved significantly from baseline to day 85 with Risperidone ISM® 75 and 100 mg, with placebo-adjusted differences of -13.0 (95% CI, -17.3 to -8.8); (p < 0.0001), and -13.3 (-17.6 to -8.9); (p < 0.0001), respectively. Significantly improved mean changes were also obtained for CGI-S score from baseline to day 85 for both doses of Risperidone ISM® compared with placebo -0.7 (-1.0 to -0.5); p < 0.0001, for both doses. The statistically significant improvement for both efficacy outcomes were observed as early as 8 days after first injection. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were increased blood prolactin (7.8%), headache (7.3%), hyperprolactinemia (5%), and weight increase (4.8%). Neither new nor unexpected relevant safety information was recorded. Risperidone ISM® provided rapid and progressive reduction of symptoms in patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia without need of oral risperidone supplementation or loading doses. Both doses were safe and well tolerated.

What happens with schizophrenia patients after their discharge from hospital? Results on outcome and treatment from a "real-world" 2-year follow-up trial.

Aim of the study was to examine the course of schizophrenia patients within 2 years after discharge. Within a multicenter study of the German Competence Network on Schizophrenia, patients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were examined regarding their psychopathological improvement, tolerability, and the treatment regime applied during hospitalization and a 2-year follow-up period. Response, remission, the level of everyday functioning, and relapse were furthermore evaluated during the follow-up period using established definitions for these outcome domains. The psychopharmacological treatment was specifically evaluated in terms of a potential association with relapse. 149 patients were available for analysis, with 65% of the patients being in response, 52% in symptomatic remission, and 64% having a satisfiable everyday functioning 2 years after their discharge from hospital. Despite these favorable outcome rates, 63% of the patients suffered from a relapse within the 2-year follow-up period with 86% of these patients being rehospitalized. Discharge non-responder and non-remitter were twice as likely to relapse during follow-up. A significant decrease of side-effects was observed with negligible rates of extrapyramidal side-effects, sedation, and weight gain during follow-up. Patients receiving treatment with atypical antipsychotics were found to have the lowest risk to relapse (p < 0.0001). The results highlight the natural and unsteady course of schizophrenia in most patients underlining the need to develop more specific treatment strategies ensuring ongoing stability and preventing relapse.

Remission in schizophrenia - What are we measuring? Comparing the consensus remission criteria to a CGI-based definition of remission and to remission in major depression.

BACKGROUND: Despite being recommended for use in clinical trials, the consensus remission criteria were found to leave patients with persisting symptoms, relevant areas of functional impairment and a decreased sense of wellbeing. Therefore, to evaluate the appropriateness of the schizophrenia consensus criteria, a definition of remission based on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) was developed and remitter subgroups were compared. METHODS: 239 patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were evaluated regarding their remission status after inpatient treatment. Remission in schizophrenia was defined according to the symptom-severity component of the consensus criteria by Andreasen et al. and a CGI based definition was calculated using sensitivity and specificity using receiver operating curves (asymptomatic remitter). Both remitter groups (schizophrenia consensus versus asymptomatic remitters) were compared regarding different clinical variables at discharge as well as the likelihood to relapse within a 1-year follow-up period. Both schizophrenia remitter subgroups were compared to remitters in major depression as a reference value. RESULTS: Following the consensus criteria, 63% of the schizophrenia patients were in remission compared to only 18% following the asymptomatic criterion. The schizophrenia consensus remitters were less likely to be concurrent treatment responders (p < 0.0001), had a significantly greater illness severity (p < 0.0001) and less functioning (p = 0.0358) as well as a significantly greater risk to relapse (p = 0.0174) compared to the schizophrenia asymptomatic remitters as well as the depressed remitters. CONCLUSION: It should be critically re-evaluated if the currently proposed consensus criteria are adequate to measure what is traditionally understood to be remission.

Should antidepressants be used in minor depression?

Minor/subthreshold depression is associated with functional impairment, reduced quality of life, and the risk of developing into major depression. Therefore, it should be treated. Watchful waiting should be an option only for patients who, despite adequate information, are not interested in any kind of treatment. Psychotherapy has been found to be effective, but due to methodological problems (control group, blinding), efficacy derived from randomized trials might be over-estimated. Studies on the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of minor depression have found clinically relevant benefits over placebo, particularly the newer, better-controlled trials. One major advantage of antidepressants over psychotherapy is their immediate availability and the short period required to evaluate efficacy. Aside from the severity of depression, the patient's attitude towards psychotherapy or antidepressant treatment is of major relevance and should be explored. In a shared decision-making process, the patient should receive appropriate information on treatment options, state her or his preferences, and then receive the treatment of choice.

La depresión menor / subumbral se asocia con deterioro funcional, calidad de vida reducida y riesgo de desarrollar una depresión mayor. Por lo tanto, debe ser tratada. La observación atenta de la evolución debe ser una opción sólo para los pacientes que, a pesar de la información adecuada, no están interesados en ningún tipo de tratamiento. Se ha encontrado que la psicoterapia es efectiva, pero debido a los problemas metodológicos (grupos de control, estudios ciegos) podría estar sobreestimada la eficacia derivada de los ensayos aleatorizados. Los estudios acerca de la eficacia de los antidepresivos en el tratamiento de la depresión menor han encontrado beneficios clínicamente relevantes respecto del placebo, especialmente en los ensayos más nuevos y mejor controlados. Una de las principales ventajas de los antidepresivos sobre la psicoterapia es su disponibilidad inmediata y el corto período requerido para evaluar la eficacia. La actitud del paciente hacia la psicoterapia o el tratamiento antidepresivo es de gran importancia y debe explorarse, más allá de la gravedad de la depresión. En un proceso de toma de decisiones compartido, el paciente debe recibir información apropiada sobre las opciones terapéuticas, establecer sus preferencias y luego recibir el tratamiento de elección.

Une dépression dite mineure ou infra-seuil s'associe à une déficience fonctionnelle, une détérioration de la qualité de vie et le risque de passage à une dépression majeure. Elle doit donc être traitée. Une position attentiste vigilante peut se comprendre seulement pour les patients qui ne souhaitent aucun traitement même après avoir été bien informés. La psychothérapie s'est montrée efficace mais cette efficacité a peut-être été surestimée dans les études randomisées à cause de problèmes méthodologiques (groupe témoin, aveugle). Les résultats de certaines études (surtout les plus récentes, mieux contrôlées) sur l'efficacité des antidépresseurs dans le traitement de la dépression mineure ont montré des bénéfices cliniquement pertinents par rapport au placebo. Un des principaux avantages des antidépresseurs sur la psychothérapie est leur disponibilité immédiate et la courte période nécessaire à l'évaluation de leur efficacité. Au-delà de la sévérité de la dépression, l'attitude du patient vis-à-vis de la psychothérapie ou des antidépresseurs est très importante et devrait être analysée. Dans un cadre de décision partagée, le patient devrait être correctement informé sur les choix thérapeutiques, donner ses préférences et enfin, recevoir le traitement qu'il a choisi.

Psychiatric sequelae of cardiac arrest.

This manuscript summarizes the literature on mental health outcomes after cardiac arrest. Survivors of cardiac arrest show high rates of mental illness with more than 40% suffering from anxiety, 30% from depression, and 25% from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Mental health outcomes may differ depending on the setting in which the cardiac arrest occurred. A major problem is reduced neuropsychological functioning. Between 30% and 50% of survivors of cardiac arrest suffer from cognitive deficits. Deficits of attention, declarative memory, executive function, visual-spatial abilities, and verbal fluency have been observed. As a result of numerous psychopathological symptoms (depression in 14% to 45%, anxiety in 13% to 61%, and PTSD in 19% to 27%) and reduced cognitive functioning (about 20% to 60%), relevantly reduced quality of life is observed in about 20% of cardiac arrest survivors.

Este artículo es un resumen de la literatura acerca de las consecuencias de un paro cardíaco sobre la salud mental. Los sobrevivientes de un paro cardíaco tienen una alta frecuencia de enfermedad mental; más del 40% presentan ansiedad, 30% depresión y 25% trastorno por estrés postraumático (TEPT). Las consecuencias sobre la salud mental pueden variar según el lugar donde ocurra el paro cardíaco. Un problema importante es la reducción del funcionamiento neuropsicológico. Entre el 30% y el 50% de los sobrevivientes de un paro cardíaco presentan déficits cognitivos. Se han observado déficits en la atención, en la memoria declarativa, en la función ejecutiva, en las habilidades viso-espaciales y en la fluidez verbal. Se ha encontrado una reducción importante en la calidad de vida en cerca del 20% de los sobrevivientes de un paro cardíaco, debido a los numerosos síntomas psicopatológicos (depresión en 14% a 45%, ansiedad en 13% a 61% y TEPT en 19% a 27% de los casos) y a la disminución de las funciones cognitivas (alrededor del 20% a 60%).

Cet article est un resumé de la littérature sur les conséquences d'un arrêt cardiaque sur la santé mentale. Les survivants d'un arrêt cardiaque montrent des taux élevés de maladie mentale, plus de 40 % d'entre eux souffrant d'anxiété, 30 % de dépression et 25 % de trouble de stress post-traumatique (TSPT). Les effets sur la santé mentale diffèrent selon le contexte de survenue de l'arrêt cardiaque. Le problème majeur est la diminution du fonctionnement neuropsychologique. Entre 30 % et 50 % des survivants d'un arrêt cardiaque souffrent d'un déficit cognitif. Ont été observés: des déficits de l'attention, de la mémoire déclarative, des fonctions exécutives, des capacités visuo-spatiales et de la fluidité verbale. La qualité de vie est significativement dégradée chez environ 20 % des survivants d'un arrêt cardiaque, en raison de nombreux symptômes psychopathologiques (dépression dans 14% a 45% des cas, anxiété dans 13% à 61% des cas et TSPT dans 19% à 27% des cas) et d'une diminution des fonctions cognitives (environ 20% à 60%).

Early detection and integrated care for adolescents and young adults with severe psychotic disorders: rationales and design of the Integrated Care in Early Psychosis Study (ACCESS III).

AIM: The Integrated Care in Early Psychosis (ACCESS III) Study examined the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention consisting of strategies to improve early detection and quality of care (integrated care including therapeutic assertive community treatment) in adolescents and young adults in the early phase of a severe psychotic disorder from 2011 to 2014. METHODS: This is a prospective, single-centre, 1-year cohort study comparing an intervention condition (early detection plus integrated care, n = 120) to the historical control condition (standard care, SC, n = 105) for adolescents and young adults aged 12-29 years suffering from a severe, early-phase psychotic disorder (i.e. within 2 years of treatment). RESULTS: Primary outcome is the rate of combined symptomatic (i.e. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) criteria) and functional (i.e. Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) ≥ 60 points criterion) remission over at least 6 months at study endpoint. Secondary outcome comprises the comparison of the reduction in the duration of untreated psychosis within the 4-year study duration between integrated care and SC, course of psychopathology, functioning, quality of life, satisfaction with care, cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in comparison to a historical control group. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention consisting of early detection strategies and strategies to improve quality of care in both adolescents and young adults with early-phase psychosis. The results will be published in 2016.

Long-term effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly for schizophrenia is maintained in the QUALIFY extension study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of continued treatment with aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (AOM 400) in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Patients who completed the QUALIFY study (NCT01795547) in the AOM 400 arm were eligible for 6 additional once-monthly injections of AOM 400 during an open-label, 24-week extension (NCT01959035). Safety data were collected at each visit. Effectiveness measures included change from baseline in health-related qualify of life and functioning on the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life scale (QLS) and Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scale. RESULTS: Of the 88 patients enrolled, 77 (88%) completed the extension study. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (incidence ≥2%) were weight increased (6/88, 7%), toothache (3/88, 3%) and headache (3/88, 3%). Effectiveness was maintained during the extension study, with small but continued improvements from baseline: the least squares mean (LSM) change (95% CI) from baseline to week 24 was 2.32 (-1.21 to 5.85) for the QLS total score and -0.10 (-0.26 to 0.06) for the CGI-S score. The aggregated LSM change (95% CI) from baseline of the lead-in study to week 24 of the extension study was 11.54 (7.45 to 15.64) for the QLS total score and -0.98 (-1.18 to -0.79) for the CGI-S score. CONCLUSIONS: AOM 400 was well tolerated in patients continuing AOM treatment during the extension phase of the QUALIFY study. Robust and clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life and functioning were maintained, further supporting the long-term clinical benefits of AOM 400 for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

Relationship between response to aripiprazole once-monthly and paliperidone palmitate on work readiness and functioning in schizophrenia: A post-hoc analysis of the QUALIFY study.

Schizophrenia is a chronic disease with negative impact on patients' employment status and quality of life. This post-hoc analysis uses data from the QUALIFY study to elucidate the relationship between work readiness and health-related quality of life and functioning. QUALIFY was a 28-week, randomized study (NCT01795547) comparing the treatment effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg and paliperidone palmitate once-monthly using the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale as the primary endpoint. Also, patients' capacity to work and work readiness (Yes/No) was assessed with the Work Readiness Questionnaire. We categorized patients, irrespective of treatment, by work readiness at baseline and week 28: No to Yes (n = 41), Yes to Yes (n = 49), or No at week 28 (n = 118). Quality-of-Life Scale total, domains, and item scores were assessed with a mixed model of repeated measures. Patients who shifted from No to Yes in work readiness showed robust improvements on Quality-of-Life Scale total scores, significantly greater than patients not ready to work at week 28 (least squares mean difference: 11.6±2.6, p<0.0001). Scores on Quality-of-Life Scale instrumental role domain and items therein-occupational role, work functioning, work levels, work satisfaction-significantly improved in patients shifting from No to Yes in work readiness (vs patients No at Week 28). Quality-of-Life Scale total scores also significantly predicted work readiness at week 28. Overall, these results highlight a strong association between improvements in health-related quality of life and work readiness, and suggest that increasing patients' capacity to work is an achievable and meaningful goal in the treatment of impaired functioning in schizophrenia.

Add-on Antidepressants in the Naturalistic Treatment of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder - When, Who, and How?

The aim of this study was to evaluate antidepressant add-on treatment within the acute treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients. Antidepressant add-on was evaluated in 365 patients within a naturalistic multicenter study. Patients with/without antidepressant add-on were compared regarding clinical and treatment-related variables, response and remission, and remission of depressive and negative symptoms. The efficacy of antidepressant add-on treatment was furthermore analyzed applying marginal structure models. Twenty-three percent of the patients received antidepressant add-on for a mean duration of 50.28 (33.42) days. Patients with the diagnosis of a schizoaffective disorder, multiple illness episodes, and a longer duration of their illness as well as those with significantly fewer baseline positive symptoms, more negative and depressive symptoms, more side effects, and less subjective well-being were augmented with antidepressants. At discharge no significant effect of antidepressant add-on treatment was observed in terms of a 25% improvement (p=0.2623), a 50% improvement (p=0.3946), remission (p=0.0552), or remission of depressive (p=0.6336) and negative symptoms (p=0.8756). Also, when analyzing marginal structure models considering the diagnostic subgroups, no significant effect was found. Add-on with antidepressants is common. A final recommendation in terms of this strategy's efficacy cannot be given.

Reduced sexual dysfunction with aripiprazole once-monthly versus paliperidone palmitate: results from QUALIFY.

Sexual dysfunction, a common side effect of antipsychotic medications, may be partly caused by dopamine antagonism and elevation of prolactin. In QUALIFY, a randomized study, aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400), a dopamine D2 receptor partial agonist, showed noninferiority and subsequent superiority versus paliperidone palmitate (PP), a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, on the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale (QLS) in patients with schizophrenia aged 18-60 years. Sexual dysfunction (Arizona Sexual Experience Scale) and serum prolactin levels were also assessed. Odds for sexual dysfunction were lower with AOM 400 versus PP [week 28 adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.29 (0.14-0.61); P=0.0012] in men [0.33 (0.13-0.86); P=0.023], women [0.14 (0.03-0.62); P=0.0099], and patients aged 18-35 years [0.04 (<0.01-0.34); P=0.003]. Among patients shifting from sexual dysfunction at baseline to none at week 28, there was a trend toward greater improvement in the QLS total score. The mean (SD) prolactin concentrations decreased with AOM 400 [-150.6 (274.4) mIU/l] and increased with PP [464.7 (867.5) mIU/l] in both men and women. Six PP-treated patients experienced prolactin-related adverse events. In addition to greater improvement on QLS, patients had a lower risk for sexual dysfunction and prolactin elevation with AOM 400 versus PP in QUALIFY.

Multidimensional Assessment of Functional Outcomes in Schizophrenia: Results From QUALIFY, a Head-to-Head Trial of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly and Paliperidone Palmitate.

Background: QUALIFY was a 28-week, randomized, open-label, head-to-head trial that assessed improvements across multiple measures in stable patients with schizophrenia with aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg vs paliperidone palmitate. Methods: Secondary effectiveness assessments included physician-rated readiness for work using the Work Readiness Questionnaire, the Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scales, and quality of life with the rater-blinded Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale. Patients assessed their treatment satisfaction and quality of life with Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment-short version and Tolerability and Quality of Life questionnaires. Results: Odds of being ready for work at week 28 were significantly higher with aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg vs paliperidone palmitate (adjusted odds ratio, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.39-5.14; P=.003). Aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg produced numerically or significantly greater improvements from baseline vs paliperidone palmitate in all Quality of Life Scale items. With aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg vs paliperidone palmitate at week 28, there were significantly more Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement responders (adjusted odds ratio, 2.26; P=.010, and 2.51; P=.0032) and significantly better Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores (least squares mean treatment difference, -0.326; 95% CI, -0.60 to -0.05; P=.020). Numerically larger improvements with aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg vs paliperidone palmitate were observed for patient-rated scales Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment-short version and Tolerability and Quality of Life. Partial correlations were strongest among clinician-rated and among patient-rated scales but poorest between clinician and patient-rated scales. Conclusions: Consistently greater improvements were observed with aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg vs paliperidone palmitate across all measures. Partial correlations between scales demonstrate the multidimensionality of various measures of improvement. More patients on aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg were deemed ready to work by the study end. Trial registry: National Institutes of Health registry, NCT01795547, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?id=NCT01795547).

Clinical high risk for psychosis: gender differences in symptoms and social functioning.

AIM: Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disorder that presents differently in men and women: men show a higher propensity to negative symptoms, lower social functioning, earlier age at onset and co-morbid substance abuse, whereas women display more affective symptoms. It is unknown whether these differences extend to subjects at high risk (HR) of psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to address this question. METHODS: Clinical symptoms and functioning were assessed using structured interviews in 239 HR subjects (female, n = 80). The definition of being at HR was based on the criteria used in the European Prediction of Psychosis Study (EPOS). RESULTS: Men displayed more pronounced negative symptoms, higher rates of past substance abuse disorders and higher deficits in social functioning. No gender difference was found for depression, which affected almost 50% of the cohort, or age at onset for the fulfilment of HR criteria. CONCLUSION: The higher impairment in specific symptoms observed in male schizophrenia patients was also present in subjects at HR for psychosis. Further studies are required to determine whether these symptoms are gender-specific predictors of transition to psychosis and whether they warrant gender-specific interventions. The high propensity to depression in the present cohort, which was particularly pronounced in the male cohort compared with the general population, in conjunction with the observed increase in negative symptoms and functional impairment, should alert clinicians to the necessity for the identification and treatment of HR subjects, irrespective of the degree to which these features are associated with transition risk.

Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies.

The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated as inpatients at the beginning of the study were examined within two naturalistic follow-up trials from admission to discharge of an inpatient treatment period and the one-year follow-up assessment. PANSS criteria of the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for schizophrenia and HAMD criteria of the ACNP Task Force in MDD for depressive patients as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) were applied as symptomatic outcome measures additionally to functional outcome parameters. Data of 153 schizophrenia patients and 231 patients with a MDD episode have been included in the analysis. More depressive than schizophrenia patients reached a threshold score of ≤3 on the CGI-S, indicating symptomatic remission at discharge and at the one-year follow-up. In contrast similar proportions of patients reaching symptomatic remission at discharge from inpatient treatment and at the one-year follow-up in the schizophrenia and in the MDD group were found when disease-related consensus criteria (RSWG vs. ACNP Task Force) were used. Functional remission and recovery rates were significantly lower in schizophrenia than in depressive patients at the one-year follow-up visit. Common outcome criteria for remission and recovery in schizophrenia and major depression were not directly comparable. However, our results indicated a significantly poorer outcome in schizophrenia than in depressive patients according to terms of remission and recovery.

Assessment and management of agitation in psychiatry: Expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Psychomotor agitation is associated with different psychiatric conditions and represents an important issue in psychiatry. Current recommendations on agitation in psychiatry are not univocal. Actually, an improper assessment and management may result in unnecessary coercive or sedative treatments. A thorough and balanced review plus an expert consensus can guide assessment and treatment decisions. METHODS: An expert task force iteratively developed consensus using the Delphi method. Initial survey items were based on systematic review of the literature. Subsequent surveys included new, re-worded or re-rated items. RESULTS: Out of 2175 papers assessing psychomotor agitation, 124 were included in the review. Each component was assigned a level of evidence. Integrating the evidence and the experience of the task force members, a consensus was reached on 22 statements on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations on the assessment of agitation emphasise the importance of identifying any possible medical cause. For its management, experts agreed in considering verbal de-escalation and environmental modification techniques as first choice, considering physical restraint as a last resort strategy. Regarding pharmacological treatment, the "ideal" medication should calm without over-sedate. Generally, oral or inhaled formulations should be preferred over i.m. routes in mildly agitated patients. Intravenous treatments should be avoided.

Challenging the understanding of significant improvement and outcome in schizophrenia - the concept of reliable and clinically significant change methods.

Significant changes of schizophrenia patients during inpatient treatment were evalutaed and compared to established outcome criteria. The concept of reliable and clinically significant change methods was applied to three hundred and ninety-six patients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. First, information on whether or not the change of the patient's condition is sufficient in order to declare that it is beyond a measurement error or random effect (= reliable change) was evaluated and in a second step it was observed if the reliable change was clinically meaningful (= clinically significant change). Different Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) thresholds were applied to define the clinically significant change (40, 45 and 50 points). These changes were then compared to established outcome criteria such as response and remission. Seventy-nine of the 396 patients (20%) showed a reliable improvement of symptoms, whereas 70% improved without achieving a reliable change of their condition. Of the 79 patients achieving a reliable change during treatment 8-15% concurrently showed a clinically significant change depending on the respective PANSS threshold. In contrast, 56% of the patients achieved response and 60% were in remission at discharge when applying established outcome criteria. Our results showed that a rather small number of schizophrenia patients were found to reliably change during inpatient treatment, with even less patients achieving a clinically significant change. The concept of reliable and clinically significant changes revealed to be a lot more stringent than today's established outcome criteria and should be critically evaluated regarding its use in schizophrenia patients.

Qualify: a randomized head-to-head study of aripiprazole once-monthly and paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (AOM 400) and paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP) on the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale (QLS), a validated health-related quality of life and functioning measure in schizophrenia. METHOD: This 28-week, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, rater-blinded, head-to-head study (QUALIFY) of AOM 400 and PP in adult patients (18-60 years) comprised oral conversion, initiation of AOM 400 or PP treatment, and continuation with intramuscular injections every 4weeks. The primary endpoint assessed non-inferiority and superiority on QLS total score analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Of 295 randomized patients, 100/148 (67.6%) of AOM 400 and 83/147 (56.5%) of PP patients completed 28weeks of treatment. A statistically significant least squares mean difference in change from baseline to week 28 on QLS total score (4.67 [95%CI: 0.32;9.02], p=0.036) confirmed non-inferiority and established superiority of AOM 400 vs PP. There were also significant improvements in Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale and the Investigator's Assessment Questionnaire for AOM 400 vs PP, and pre-defined sub-group analyses revealed a consistent pattern of significance favoring AOM 400 in patients ≤35years. Common treatment-emergent adverse events in the treatment continuation phase were more frequent with PP vs AOM 400, and adverse events were the most frequent reason for discontinuation (27/137 [19.7%] for PP and 16/144 [11.1%] for AOM 400). All-cause discontinuation was numerically lower with AOM 400. CONCLUSION: Superior improvements on clinician-rated health-related quality of life and a favorable tolerability profile suggest greater overall effectiveness for aripiprazole once-monthly vs paliperidone palmitate. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT01795547.