Optimal sequencing of ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from a multicenter study of 683 patients.

Background: Ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax are approved for treating CLL patients in the United States. However, there is no guidance as to their optimal sequence. Patients and methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of CLL patients treated with kinase inhibitors (KIs) or venetoclax. We examined demographics, discontinuation reasons, overall response rates (ORR), survival, and post-KI salvage strategies. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 683 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were similar in the ibrutinib and idelalisib groups. ORR to ibrutinib and idelalisib as first KI was 69% and 81%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1-60), median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached. Patients treated with ibrutinib (versus idelalisib) as first KI had a significantly better PFS in all settings; front-line [hazard ratios (HR) 2.8, CI 1.3-6.3, P = 0.01], relapsed-refractory (HR 2.8, CI 1.9-4.1, P < 0.001), del17p (HR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4, P = 0.008), and complex karyotype (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-5.2, P = 0.02). At the time of initial KI failure, use of an alternate KI or venetoclax had a superior PFS when compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Furthermore, patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to progression or toxicity had marginally improved outcomes if they received venetoclax (ORR 79%) versus idelalisib (ORR 46%) (PFS HR .6, CI.3-1.0, P = 0.06). Conclusions: In the largest real-world experience of novel agents in CLL, ibrutinib appears superior to idelalisib as first KI. Furthermore, in the setting of KI failure, alternate KI or venetoclax therapy appear superior to chemoimmunotherapy combinations. The use of venetoclax upon ibrutinib failure might be superior to idelalisib. These data support the need for trials testing sequencing strategies to optimize treatment algorithms.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas in a large US multicenter cohort: prognostication in the modern era including impact of frontline therapy.

BACKGROUND: Optimal frontline therapy for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in the modern era remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes among 341 newly diagnosed PTCL patients from 2000 to 2011. Outcome was compared with a matched cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, and prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: PTCL subtypes included PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (31%), anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma (ALCL) (26%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (23%), NK/T-cell lymphoma (7%), acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (6%), and other (7%). Median age was 62 years (range 18-95 years), and 74% had stage III-IV disease. Twenty-three (7%) patients received only palliative care whereas 318 received chemotherapy: CHOP-like regimens (70%), hyperCVAD/MA (6%), or other (18%). Thirty-three patients (10%) underwent stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission. The overall response rate was 73% (61% complete); 24% had primary refractory disease. With 39-month median follow-up, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32% and 52%. PFS and OS for PTCL patients were significantly inferior to matched patients with DLBCL. On multivariate analysis, stage I-II disease was the only significant pretreatment prognostic factor [PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.85, P = 0.007; OS: HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.78, P = 0.006]. ALK positivity in ALCL was prognostic on univariate analysis, but lost significance on multivariate analysis. The most dominant prognostic factor was response to initial therapy (complete response versus other), including adjustment for stage and SCT [PFS: HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.28, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17-0.40, P < 0.0001]. No overall survival difference was observed based on choice of upfront regimen or SCT in first remission. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identifies early-stage disease and initial treatment response as dominant prognostic factors in PTCL. No clear benefit was observed for patients undergoing consolidative SCT. Novel therapeutic approaches for PTCL are critically needed.

A multicenter phase II study incorporating high-dose rituximab and liposomal doxorubicin into the CODOX-M/IVAC regimen for untreated Burkitt's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement with intensive multi-agent chemotherapy, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for adults with high-risk Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) remains <55%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial for newly diagnosed classic BL utilizing liposomal doxorubicin (Adriamycin) in lieu of doxorubicin and incorporating intravenous rituximab (at 500 mg/m(2) twice/cycle) into the CODOX-M/IVAC regimen. Correlative analyses included paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rituximab levels and close examination of cardiac function. RESULTS: Among 25 BL patients, the median age was 44 years (23-70) and 4 patients were HIV positive. There were 20 high-risk and 5 low-risk patients. At baseline, 40% of high-risk patients had bone marrow involvement, 35% had bulky disease and 15% had central nervous system involvement. The overall response rate was 100% (complete remission 92%). At 34-month median follow-up, the 2-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 80% and 84%, respectively (low-risk: both 100%; high-risk: 76% and 81%, respectively). Furthermore, the 2-year PFS, OS, and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates for high-risk, HIV-negative patients were 84%, 89% and 100%, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) appeared to be consistent with prior CODOX-M/IVAC data, although there were several grade 3 cardiac events noted (all declined ejection fraction without clinical symptoms). The mean serum rituximab levels at 24 h after cycles 1 and 3 for patients without relapse were 258 and 306 µg/ml, respectively, versus 131 and 193 µg/ml, respectively, for patients with early progression (P = 0.002 and 0.002, respectively). The mean CSF rituximab levels for all patients were 0.11 and 0.24 µg/ml, respectively, at cycle 1 (24/72 h), which equated to serum:CSF ratios of 0.05% and 0.20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of rituximab into CODOX-M/IVAC for adult BL was feasible and tolerable, while changes in cardiac function warrant continued examination. This regimen was associated with excellent survival rates for HIV-negative BL. Further investigation of the predictive value of serum rituximab is needed. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00392990.

A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is deregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC. METHODS: In this phase II open label study, eligible patients received IV temsirolimus at 25 mg weekly until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or investigator's discretion. Toxicity was assessed every 4 weeks and responses every 8 weeks. Primary end point was calculating the overall response (OR) rate as well as measuring stable disease (SD) to assess the overall clinical benefit calculated as OR+SD. Secondary end points included prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) changes and time to progression biochemically and radiographically. Correlative studies included prospective assessment of quality of life (QoL) using two previously validated scales. RESULTS: Although the sponsor halted the study early, 21 patients were enrolled of which, 15 were evaluable for efficacy and OR. Median age was 74 (range: 57-89), median PSA was 237.5 ng ml(-1) (range: 8.2-2360), visceral disease present in 11 patients (52%), and 17 patients (81%) patients had Gleason score (7-10). Two patients had a partial response (PR) and eight had SD. The OR was 13% (2/15) and the overall clinical benefit (OR+SD) was 67% (10/15). Median time to radiographic disease progression was 2 months (range 2-10 months). Biochemical response assessment was available for 14/15 patients. Any PSA decline was observed in four patients (28.5%; 4/14) with one patient (7%) having >50% PSA decline. Median time to progression by PSA was 2 months (range 1-10 months). With a median follow-up of 32 months, median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 2-37) and three patients remain alive at the data cutoff (5/2013) for an OS of 14% at 4 years on an intent-to-treat analysis. Major non-haematologic toxicities included fatigue (19%) and pneumonia (14%). Main laboratory toxicities included hyperglycaemia (24%) and hypophosphatemia (14%). Also, 52% of enrolled patients had serious adverse events. Other toxicities were consistent with previously reported adverse events with temsirolimus. Despite these observed adverse events, temsirolimus did not adversely impact QoL. CONCLUSION: Temsirolimus monotherapy has minimal activity in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC.

Examination of the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) in the National LymphoCare study (NLCS): a prospective US patient cohort treated predominantly in community practices.

BACKGROUND: Because follicular lymphoma (FL) patients have heterogeneous outcomes, the FL international prognostic index (FLIPI) was developed to risk-stratify patients and to predict survival. However, limited data exist regarding the role of FLIPI in the era of routine first-line rituximab (R) and R-chemotherapy regimens and in the setting of community oncology practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the outcome data from the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS), a prospective, observational cohort study, which collects data on patients with FL in the United States (US) community practices. RESULTS: Among 1068 male and 1124 female patients with FLIPI data, most were treated in US community practices (79%); 35% were FLIPI good risk, 30% intermediate risk, and 35% poor risk. FLIPI risk groups were significant predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who undergo watchful waiting (WW), and those who receive non-R-containing regimens, R-alone, and R-chemotherapy combinations. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of contemporary practice with routine R use, stratifying patients into good, intermediate, and poor FLIPI risk groups predicts distinct outcomes in terms of OS and PFS. FLIPI remains an important prognostic index in the R era and should be used in clinical practices to support discussions about prognosis.

Phase I study investigating the safety and feasibility of combining imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) with sorafenib in patients with refractory castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of sorafenib (S) plus imatinib (IM) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. METHODS: Refractory CRPC patients were enrolled onto this 3+3 dose escalation designed study. Imatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined on day 15, 4 h post dose with a validated LC-MS assay. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled; 10 evaluable (6 at 400 mg S qd with 300 mg IM qd (DL0) and 4 at 400 mg S bid with 300 mg IM qd (DL1)); inevaluable patients received <1 cycle. The median age was 73 (57-89); median prostatic serum antigen was 284 ng ml(-1) (11.7-9027). Median number of prior non-hormonal therapies was 3 (1-12). Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome. Maximum tolerated dose was 400 mg S and 300 mg IM both daily. No biochemical responses were observed. Two patients had stable disease by RECIST. Median time to progression was 2 months (1-5). Median OS was 6 months (1-30+) with 3/17 patients (17%) alive at 21 months median follow-up. Ten patients had PK data suggesting that S reduced IM clearance by 55%, resulting in 77% increased exposure (P=0.005; compared with historical data). CONCLUSION: This is the first report showing that S+IM can be administered in CRPC at a dose of 400 mg S and 300 mg IM, daily.

Novel approaches and future directions in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Recent advances in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) have started to change the therapeutic landscape allowing clinicians to choose from a broad range of treatment options. Understanding the mechanisms that transform prostate cancer (PCA) into a castration-resistant state has enabled investigators to explore critical pathways involved in such process allowing for rational therapeutic design. These novel therapies complement the modest success that chemotherapy has demonstrated in recent years. In this review, we discuss the different mechanisms that render PCA castration resistant and elaborate on the nonchemotherapy approaches evolving in CRPC. These include agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, endothelin receptor antagonists, angiogenesis inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, immunotherapy, novel antiandrogens, and delivery of cytotoxic agents via therapeutic antibodies. This timely review coincides with the identification of newer therapies in this setting affirming our steady movement towards better disease control.

Hematopoietic SCT for mantle cell lymphoma: is it the standard of care?

The role of hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains controversial. Most studies that support the utility of this approach were small phase II single-institution studies with highly selected patient populations. Furthermore, recent evidence suggesting initial observation as opposed to immediate therapy in MCL, coupled with the availability of newer therapeutic agents, complicates the role of HSCT and argues for conducting large phase III studies. In this review, we discuss the limitation of current evidence and the lack of large definitive studies. We then analyze the data on HSCT in relapsed MCL and as a frontline approach propose applying the new prognostic index, MIPI (MCL International Prognostic Index), in the decision making.

Docetaxel and oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination as first-line therapy for patients with stage IV or wet III(B )non small cell lung cancer. Patients received oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m(2) intravenously over 2 hours on days 1 and 15 along with docetaxel at 30 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8; both given every 28 days. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 6. Fifteen patients were enrolled for an overall response rate of 50% (95% CI 21-74%). Median progression-free survival was 2.4 months with a 1-year progression free survival of 10%. Median overall survival was 7.9 months with 49% of patients alive at 1 year. Most common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. This combination has notable activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with a favorable toxicity profile.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (MylotargTM) is infrequently associated with sinusoidal obstructive syndrome/veno-occlusive disease.

BACKGROUND: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is approved for the treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. Several reports have suggested an association between GO administration and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which has recently been termed sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS). However, the majority of these studies were done in patients who had undergone high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation or when GO was administered in combination with other cytotoxic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated at our institution with single-agent GO, either as initial therapy or in the relapsed and refractory setting. All patients were planned to receive GO 9 mg/m2 in two doses, 14 days apart. We reviewed liver function tests before and after administration and analyzed hepatic injuries in the context of patients' other comorbid conditions. Patients were classified as experiencing liver toxicity if their liver function(s) abnormality lasted for > 7 days, as documented by repeated serum studies. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Response rate (27.2%) and median duration of response (6 months) were comparable to other reports. All patients were assessable for liver toxicity, of which 23 (48%) had elevation of at least one of their liver function tests (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin or alkaline phosphatase). Elevations in liver function test(s) were noted at a median of 14 days (range 7-175 days). Eight patients had other comorbid conditions that could explain their liver abnormality, making the incidence of direct GO-induced liver injury 31%. However, only one patient had radiographic and clinical evidence suggesting SOSVOD. CONCLUSIONS: When administered using the recommended dose and schedule, GO has little association with VODSOS if given as a single agent. In this retrospective review, the incidence of GO-related SOSVOD is as low as 2%.

Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia with MLL gene rearrangement following radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Targeted therapy with conjugated and unconjugated monoclonal antibodies for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has revolutionized the approach to this disease. The efficacy and low toxicity of these agents have allowed introduction of this strategy in the early stages of therapy. Longer follow-up is needed before validating the safety of these agents. Since monoclonal antibodies are being given as front-line therapy, it is important to identify all potential adverse events. We report a case of secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with 11q23 cytogenetic abnormality and mixed lymphoid leukemia (MLL) gene expression in a patient treated with Y90 labeled anti-CD20 antibody (Zevalin). The patient was not exposed to topoisomerase II inhibitors. Our observations suggest a relationship between 11q23 leukemia and radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) and further studies are needed.

Gemcitabine in hematologic malignancies.

Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine analogue that showed significant activity in solid malignancies. Gemcitabine acts by inhibiting DNA synthesis through chain termination and ribonucleotide reductase inhibition. During initial phase I and II studies, gemcitabine had a low toxicity profile and was well tolerated as a single agent and in combination therapy. Recently, there has been more interest in studying the activity of gemcitabine in hematologic malignancies. Gemcitabine demonstrated good activity in refractory Hodgkin disease patients, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and acute leukemias. There is a preponderance of evidence on the activity of gemcitabine in vitro in myeloma and leukemic cell lines. The activity of gemcitabine in these disorders will pave the way for incorporating this agent into the early phases of therapy.

The role of bone marrow transplantation in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a specific gene rearrangement and the generation of the PML-RARalpha fusion transcript which results from a translocation between chromosomes 15 and 17. Targeted therapy with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline-based chemotherapy results in an apparent cure in 70-80% of patients. Both allogeneic (ALLO) and autologous (AUTO) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are effective in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but their role in APL is not clear given the excellent outcome with ATRA and chemotherapy. Several retrospective studies have analyzed the outcome of patients undergoing AUTO or ALLO-HSCT in first (CR1) or second (CR2) complete remission. Most of these studies have shown significant transplant-related mortality (TRM) with ALLO-HSCT, but a reduction in relapse rate compared with AUTO-HSCT. The high TRM with ALLO-HSCT and the excellent outcome with ATRA and chemotherapy do not justify recommending this procedure for the majority of patients in CR1. The role of AUTO-HSCT in CR1 also is unclear. A small subset of patients at high risk of relapse, possibly identifiable by a high white blood cell count at presentation may benefit from HSCT. Most patients with relapsed disease achieve CR2 with ATRA, arsenic trioxide, or combination therapy. However, it is not known if these responses are sustained or if consolidation with HSCT has a place in this setting. The outcome of AUTO-HSCT in CR2 using stem cells that are negative for PML-RARalpha is excellent. It is unclear whether ALLO-HSCT from an HLA-identical sibling is superior to AUTO-HSCT with PML-RARalpha-negative cells in CR2 since the former would be associated with graft-versus-leukemia effects and the latter with lower TRM. Alternatively, arsenic trioxide or re-treatment with ATRA, followed by intensive chemotherapy may also be effective. A randomized prospective clinical trial, or a retrospective analysis of the available data would be useful in answering this critical question.

The alternatively spliced type II corticotropin-releasing factor receptor, stably expressed in LLCPK-1 cells, is not well coupled to the G protein(s).

Two alternatively spliced corticotropin-releasing factor receptor (CRF-R) cDNAs, type I and type II, were recently isolated from a human cDNA library. The two cDNAs are identical except that the type II cDNA encodes an additional 29 amino acid inserted in the first putative cytoplasmic loop. Since the first cytoplasmic loop is highly conserved in all the members of the hCRF receptor family we have examined whether the presence of the 29 amino acid cassette in CRF-RII influences G protein coupling in LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing the type I and type II hCRF receptors. Whether measured in intact cells or in membrane preparations, LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing CRF-RII have a 4-5 fold lower binding affinity. Maximal CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing CRF-RI was 10-15-fold higher than that in LLCPK-1 cells expressing CRF-RII. The EC50 for CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in hCRF-RI-expressing cells was in the range of 0.5 +/- 0.2 nM. In contrast, the EC50 for CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in hCRF-RII expressing cells was 7.7 +/- 0.2 nM. hCRF increased phosphoinositide turnover in LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing CRF-RI but not in those expressing CRF-RII; this effect required hCRF concentrations of 100 nM and higher. In membrane preparations, GTP-gamma-S inhibited hCRF binding to CRF-RI and shifted the binding Kd from 4.5 nM to 16.7 nM. Conversely, GTP-gamma-S did not influence hCRF binding to CRF-RII in broken cell membranes. Additionally, CRF-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in cell membranes expressing CRF-RI was potentiated by GTP, whereas CRF-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in cell membranes expressing CRF-RII was insensitive to GTP. These data indicate that CRF-RII is not well coupled to the G protein. Since the only difference between the CRF-RII and CRF-RI is the insert in the first putative cytoplasmic loop, these data indicate that the first cytoplasmic loop plays a crucial role in hCRF receptor coupling to the G protein.