Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 19(6): 880-889, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507538

RESUMO

Care of the critically injured burn patient presents unique challenges to the intensivist. Certified burn centers are rare and geographically sparse, necessitating that much of the initial management of patients with severe burn injuries must happen in the pre-burn center setting. Severe burn injuries often lead to a wide range of complications that extend beyond the loss of skin integrity and require specialized care. As such, medical intensivists are often called on to stabilize these critically injured patients. This focused review outlines the clinical care of these medically complex patients, including airway management, postburn complications, volume resuscitation, nutrition, and end-of-life care.


Assuntos
Unidades de Queimados , Ressuscitação , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Certificação , Humanos
2.
HPB (Oxford) ; 23(4): 587-594, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32933844

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Pringle Maneuver (PM) is considered to be safe and effective. However, data regarding perioperative outcomes after a PM are conflicting. Therefore, the aim of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of patients who have and have not undergone a PM in North America. METHODS: Patients undergoing major (≥3 segments) or partial hepatectomy (≤2 segments) were identified in the 2014-17 ACS-NSQIP hepatectomy database. Patients with and without a PM were compared. Propensity matching was utilized, and subgroup analyses by liver texture, hepatectomy extent and pathology were performed. RESULTS: Prior to matching, 3706 (24%) of 15,748 hepatectomy patients underwent a PM. The PM was utilized in 1445 (27%) of major and 2261 (22%) of partial hepatectomies. After matching, 3295 patients with and 3295 without a PM were compared. Operative time was significantly increased for patients undergoing a PM (246 vs. 225 min, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed post-hepatectomy liver failure and septic shock to be significantly increased (both p < 0.05) for patients undergoing a PM during a partial hepatectomy or in patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing a partial hepatectomy and those with metastatic disease have worse outcomes when a Pringle Maneuver is performed.


Assuntos
Falência Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...