Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol ; 28(2): 116-123, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of lung nodules continues to be a challenge. Confirmed diagnosis allows appropriate treatment for cancers and allows avoidance of more invasive procedures for proven noncancers. Currently, available lung biopsy technologies each have their own limitations, which affect the ability to successfully navigate to a suspicious nodule and to collect a diagnostic sample. Additional advancements in endobronchial navigation, localization, and guided biopsy are needed to obtain higher rates of definitive diagnosis for lung nodules. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter study that assessed the localization success rate and diagnostic yield of bronchoscopies guided only by the LungVision platform. Physicians navigated to pulmonary nodules according to a proposed pathway and verified nodule location using radial endobronchial ultrasound before the biopsy. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients had >1 nodule that was evaluated on the day of the procedure. During bronchoscopy, the nodule localization success rate was 93%. The overall diagnostic yield measured the day of the procedure, based on the immediate rapid on-site pathology report, was 75.4%. CONCLUSION: LungVision provides reliable navigation and ability to biopsy pulmonary nodules with an acceptable success rate. The platform demonstrates a high localization rate of pulmonary nodules.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário , Broncoscopia , Endossonografia , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 10(1): e37-e44, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31479771

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Calypso Beacon transponder has been modified by the addition of a nitinol anchor feature to allow for positional stability when implanted bronchoscopically into the lung. The purpose of this study was to confirm the feasibility and safety of anchored transponder placement and feasibility of lung target localization and tracking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed cancer in the lung (primary or metastatic) who were scheduled to receive external beam radiation therapy. Three anchored transponders were implanted via flexible bronchoscopy into small (approximately 2- to 2.5-mm diameter) airways. Patient alignment at each radiation fraction was performed with the Calypso system, and anchored transponder position was tracked during radiation delivery. The primary endpoint was defined as the ability to localize at least 85% of the patients during the first week of treatment. Four follow-up visits were specified including a posttreatment assessment and every 3 months up to 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients underwent anchored transponder placement, and all 207 implanted anchored transponders were visible on the treatment-planning simulation computed tomography scan. Sixty-seven patients underwent radiation therapy, and localization was successful in 66 cases (98.5%). With 1 failure in 67 cases, the P value for rejecting the null hypothesis was <.001 and the primary objective of the study met. Five adverse events in 5 patients were potentially attributed to the study device or implantation procedure, consisting of pneumonia (2 cases), pleural abscess (1 case), and pneumothorax (2 cases). Two serious events (cardiac arrest and acute hypotension) were attributed to anesthesia during the implantation procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly supports that anchored transponders are safe, positionally stable, and useful for lung tumor localization and monitoring.


Assuntos
Marcadores Fiduciais/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncoscopia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/instrumentação
3.
Lung ; 197(5): 627-633, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31463549

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Air leaks are common after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). This can increase post-operative morbidity, cost, and hospital length of stay. The management of post-pulmonary resection air leaks remains challenging. Minimally invasive effective interventions are necessary. The Spiration Valve System (SVS, Olympus/Spiration Inc., Redmond, WA, US) is approved by the FDA under humanitarian use exemption for management of prolonged air leaks. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter registry of 39 patients with air leaks after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and LVRS managed with an intention to use bronchoscopic SVS to resolve air leaks. RESULTS: Bronchoscopic SVS placement was feasible in 82.1% of patients (32/39 patients) and 90 valves were placed with a median of 2 valves per patient (mean of 2.7 ± 1.5 valves, range of 1 to 7 valves). Positive response to SVS placement was documented in 76.9% of all patients (30/39 patients) and in 93.8% of patients when SVS placement was feasible (30/32 patients). Air leaks ultimately resolved when SVS placement was feasible in 87.5% of patients (28/32 patients), after a median of 2.5 days (mean ± SD of 8.9 ± 12.4 days). Considering all patients with an intention to treat analysis, bronchoscopic SVS procedure likely contributed to resolution of air leaks in 71.8% of patients (28/39 patients). The post-procedure median hospital stay was 4 days (mean 6.0 ± 6.1 days). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective registry adds to the growing body of literature supporting feasible and effective management of air leaks utilizing one-way valves.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/instrumentação , Pneumonectomia/efeitos adversos , Pneumotórax/terapia , Idoso , Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonectomia/instrumentação , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Pneumotórax/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol ; 21(4): 288-97, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25321447

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction surgery improves quality of life, exercise capacity, and survival in selected patients but is accompanied by significant morbidity. Bronchoscopic approaches may provide similar benefits with less morbidity. METHODS: In a randomized, sham procedure controlled, double-blind trial, 277 subjects were enrolled at 36 centers. Patients had emphysema, airflow obstruction, hyperinflation, and severe dyspnea. The primary effectiveness measure was a significant improvement in disease-related quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) and changes in lobar lung volumes. The primary safety measure was a comparison of serious adverse events. RESULTS: There were 6/121 (5.0%) responders in the treatment group at 6 months, significantly >1/134 (0.7%) in the control group [Bayesian credible intervals (BCI), 0.05%, 9.21%]. Lobar volume changes were significantly different with an average decrease in the treated lobes of -224 mL compared with -17 mL for the control group (BCI, -272, -143). The proportion of responders in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire was not greater in the treatment group. There were significantly more subjects with a serious adverse event in the treatment group (n=20 or 14.1%) compared with the control group (n=5 or 3.7%) (BCI, 4.0, 17.1), but most were neither procedure nor device related. CONCLUSIONS: This trial had technical and statistical success but partial-bilateral endobronchial valve occlusion did not obtain clinically meaningful results. Safety results were acceptable and compare favorably to lung volume reduction surgery and other bronchial valve studies. Further studies need to focus on improved patient selection and a different treatment algorithm. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00475007.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Próteses e Implantes , Enfisema Pulmonar/terapia , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...