Mefloquine compared with other malaria chemoprophylactic regimens in tourists visiting east Africa.

There is much confusion over which malaria chemoprophylaxis should be used in areas such as East Africa. We did two consecutive studies between 1985 and 1991 to assess the efficacy and side-effects of malaria chemoprophylaxis in short-term travellers to East Africa. All passengers returning from Kenya to Europe received an in-flight questionnaire and a second one three months later. Any report of documented malaria or of admission to hospital for possible side-effects was verified with the physician. 145 003 travellers completed questionnaires. Among the 139 164 who stayed in East Africa for less than one year, 296 cases of confirmed malaria were reported (275 due to P falciparum). In people who used no chemoprophylaxis, the incidence of falciparum malaria was 1.2% per month. Prophylactic effectiveness was 91% (95% Cl 85 to 94) for mefloquine, 82% (71 to 89) for pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine, 72% (56 to 82) for chloroquine plus proguanil, and 10 to 42% for chloroquine at various doses. Rates of side-effects, which were usually mild, were 18.8% for mefloquine users, 17.1% and 18.6% for chloroquine 300 mg and 600 mg base per week, respectively, 30.1% for chloroquine plus proguanil, and 11.7% for sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine. Mefloquine is significantly more effective than chloroquine plus proguanil for malaria prophylaxis in short-term tourists visiting East Africa and has a tolerance similar to that of chloroquine used alone.

[Malaria prophylaxis of West German travelers to Africa]. / Malaria-Prophylaxe bundesdeutscher Afrikareisender.

From May 1985 to July 1988, 11,445 German residents who had travelled to Africa filled in a questionnaire during the return flight and a second questionnaire sent to them 3 months later. 92.6% of the travellers had been on holiday and 99.3% of these holiday-makers were aware of the risk of malaria. Before and during their stay in the tropics 10,955 travellers (95.7%) had taken the chemoprophylaxis correctly, though in some instances the drugs prescribed were not in accordance with the guidelines existing at the time. However, 3227 of them (35.5%) discontinued the drugs too early, i.e. less than four weeks after their return. Only 4.3% of the travellers had taken proper precautions against mosquito bites. In view of the ever increasing numbers of people travelling to countries where malaria is endemic, doctors and travelers should be provided with more information and should be given more consistent advice on malaria prophylaxis.

Malaria chemoprophylaxis among European tourists in tropical Africa: use, adverse reactions, and efficacy.

In order to determine knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria prophylaxis, as well as its side-effects and efficacy, a self-administered questionnaire was distributed to European travellers on return flights from tropical Africa to Europe. Between 1985 and 1988 the questionnaire was completed by 44,472 passengers (80.1% of those on board) on 242 flights. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by 42,202 (94.9%) of the same travellers 3 months later. Almost all knew about the risk of malaria, but 10% relied solely on advice from nonmedical sources. While 55.6% had taken at least one measure against mosquito bites, only 4.5% adopted three such measures (used repellents and insecticides and wore long clothing after dusk). Compliance with chemoprophylaxis use was reported by 57.0% of travellers who spent less than 3 months in Africa, compared with 29.2% who stayed 3-12 months. Depending on the antimalaria regimen taken, 11-44% of the travellers experienced adverse effects, while four deaths were attributed to the chemoprophylaxis. The incidence of malaria per month of exposure for travellers who took no chemoprophylaxis was 15.2 per 1000 in East Africa and 24.2 per 1000 in West Africa. In East Africa, the prophylactic efficacy of the currently recommended antimalaria regimens (relative to that of no chemoprophylaxis) was zero for a chloroquine dosage of 300 mg base per week (4 malaria fatalities), 64.1% for a chloroquine dosage of 600 mg base per week (P = 0.03), and 94.0% for mefloquine (P = 0.003).

Malaria chemoprophylaxis among European tourists in tropical Africa : use; adverse reactions; and efficacy

In order to determine knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria prophylaxis, as well as its side-effects and efficacy, a self-administered questionnaire was distributed to European travellers on return flights from tropical Africa to Europe. Between 1985 and 1988 the questionnaire was completed by 44,472 passengers (80.1% of those on board) on 242 flights. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by 42,202 (94.9%) of the same travellers 3 months later. Almost all knew about the risk of malaria, but 10% relied solely on advice from nonmedical sources. While 55.6% had taken at least one measure against mosquito bites, only 4.5% adopted three such measures (used repellents and insecticides and wore long clothing after dusk). Compliance with chemoprophylaxis use was reported by 57.0% of travellers who spent less than 3 months in Africa, compared with 29.2% who stayed 3-12 months. Depending on the antimalaria regimen taken, 11-44% of the travellers experienced adverse effects, while four deaths were attributed to the chemoprophylaxis. The incidence of malaria per month of exposure for travellers who took no chemoprophylaxis was 15.2 per 1000 in East Africa and 24.2 per 1000 in West Africa. In East Africa, the prophylactic efficacy of the currently recommended antimalaria regimens (relative to that of no chemoprophylaxis) was zero for a chloroquine dosage of 300 mg base per week (4 malaria fatalities), 64.1% for a chloroquine dosage of 600 mg base per week (P = 0.03), and 94.0% for mefloquine (P = 0.003)