An OECD TG 428 study ring trial with 14C-Caffeine demonstrating repeatability and robustness of the dermal absorption in vitro method.

The dermal absorption potential of 14C-Caffeine applied as a 4 mg/mL concentration (10 µL/cm2 finite dose) was investigated in six laboratories under Good Laboratory Practice conditions using an OECD TG 428-compliant in vitro assay with flow-through cells and split-thickness human skin. Potential sources of variation were reduced by a standardized protocol, test item and skin source. Particularly, skin samples from same donors were distributed over two repeats and between labs in a non-random, stratified design. Very similar recovery was achieved in the various assay compartments between laboratories, repeats and donors, demonstrating that the assay can be robustly and reliably performed. The absorption in one laboratory was 5-fold higher than in the others. This did not clearly correlate with skin integrity parameters but might be associated with an accidental COVID-19 pandemic-related interruption in sample shipment. It is possible that other factors may affect dermal absorption variation not routinely assessed or considered in the current method. The mean receptor fluid recovery, potential absorption (recovery in receptor fluid and skin except tape strips 1 and 2) and mass balance of caffeine was 6.99%, 7.14% and 99.13%, respectively, across all and 3.87%, 3.96% and 99.00% in the subset of five laboratories.

The food contaminant acetamide is not an in vivo clastogen, aneugen, or mutagen in rodent hematopoietic tissue.

Acetamide (CAS 60-35-5) is classified by IARC as a Group 2B, possible human carcinogen, based on the induction of hepatocellular carcinomas in rats following chronic exposure to high doses. Recently, acetamide was found to be present in a variety of human foods, warranting further investigation. The regulatory body JECFA has previously noted conflicting reports on acetamide's ability to induce micronuclei (MN) in mice in vivo. To better understand the potential in vivo genotoxicity of acetamide, we performed acute MN studies in rats and mice, and a subchronic study in rats, the target species for liver cancer. In the acute exposure, animals were gavaged with water vehicle control, 250, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg acetamide, or the positive control (1 mg/kg mitomycin C). In the subchronic assay, bone marrow of rats gavaged at 1000 mg/kg/day (limit dose) for 28 days was evaluated. Both acute and subchronic exposures showed no change in the ratio of polychromatic to total erythrocytes (P/E) at any dose, nor was there any increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MN-PCE). Potential mutagenicity of acetamide was evaluated in male rats gavaged with vehicle control or 1500 mg/kg/day acetamide using the in vivoPig-a gene mutation assay. There was no increase in mutant red blood cells or reticulocytes in acetamide-treated animals. In both acute and sub-chronic studies, elevated blood plasma acetamide in treated animals provided evidence of systemic exposure. We conclude based on this study that acetamide is not clastogenic, aneugenic, or mutagenic in vivo in rodent hematopoietic tissue warranting a formal regulatory re-evaluation.

Comparison of in chemico skin sensitization methods and development of an in chemico skin photosensitization assay.

Chemical substances that induce an allergic response in skin upon contact are called skin allergens or sensitizers, while chemical substances that elicit an allergic response only in presence of light are called photoallergens or photo sensitizers. The Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA, OECD N° 442C, 2015) and the Amino Acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA) are in chemico assays used to discriminate between allergens and non-allergens. The DPRA and the ADRA, respectively, monitor the depletion of model peptides and modified amino acids induced by crosslinking with test chemicals. In the current study we compared these two assays and analyzed their suitability to predict skin sensitization potential of several chemical substances.  In order to study the combined effect of a chemical compound and UV light, we modified DPRA (photo-DPRA) as well as ADRA (photo-ADRA) by introduction of a photo-irradiation parameter. Analysis using photo-DPRA and photo-ADRA correctly distinguished known photoallergens from non-photoallergens. Upon irradiation, photoallergens selectively showed higher depletion of model peptides or modified amino acids. Thus, photo-DPRA and/or photo-ADRA can serve as non-animal in vitro methods for the identification and assessment of photoallergens/ photosensitizers.