Comparison of the effects of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section on neonatal neurologic and adaptive capacity scores.

Fifty-two neonates delivered by elective cesarean section were evaluated using the Neonatal Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Twenty of the mothers received general anesthesia, 14 received epidural, and 18 received spinal anesthesia. All mothers receiving regional anesthesia were prehydrated with 1000 ml of lactated Ringer's solution and were given oxygen via a transparent face mask. All mothers undergoing general anesthesia received thiopental for induction followed by N2O-O2 (4 L:4 L) and 0.5% enflurane until delivery of the baby. All mothers were healthy, not in labor, and were scheduled for elective cesarean section. All neonates weighed 2500 g or more, had Apgar scores of 7 or more at 1 and 5 min, and had normal acid base and blood gas data. Neonates delivered with general anesthesia scored significantly lower on some of the test items for adaptive capacity, passive tone, active tone, primary reflexes, and total scores at both 15 min and 2 hr of age (P less than 0.05) than those delivered with either epidural or spinal anesthesia. Neonates delivered with epidural anesthesia scored lower than those delivered with spinal anesthesia on supporting reaction and motor activity at 2 hr of age (P less than 0.05). All neonates had high scores at 24 hr, at which time there were no significant differences between the three groups.

Maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects of lidocaine with and without epinephrine for epidural anesthesia in obstetrics.

The effects of epidural lidocaine with and without 1:300,000 epinephrine on uterine activity, progress of labor, fetal heart rate, maternal blood pressure and heart rate, newborn Apgar scores, neonatal acid-base status, and the Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scoring System were compared in 30 parturients during labor and delivery. Patients in group I (n = 16) received 1.5% lidocaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine and those in group II (n = 14) 1.5% lidocaine alone. Addition of epinephrine to lidocaine did not have any significant effects on uterine activity, duration of first or second stages of labor, fetal heart rate variability, or the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns. Maternal heart rate and the incidence of hypotensive episodes did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients. Apgar scores, neonatal acid-base status, and the NACS were equally good in the two groups. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group I as compared to group II patients (106.9 +/- 6.6 vs 66.2 +/- 4.4 min, P less than 0.001). Umbilical venous concentrations of lidocaine and umbilical vein to maternal vein ratios of lidocaine were significantly higher in group II patients (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that addition of epinephrine to lidocaine during epidural anesthesia in the normal parturient has no adverse effects on mother, fetus, neonate, or the progress of labor and it significantly prolongs the duration of anesthesia and limits the placental transfer of lidocaine.

Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in parturients receiving bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, or lidocaine--maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects.

The effects of epidural analgesia for labor and delivery using a continuous infusion technique on fetal heart rate, uterine activity, maternal blood pressure, Apgar scores, neonatal acid-base status, and the Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scoring System were studied in 61 parturients. Group I (n = 23) received initial test and therapeutic doses of 2 and 6 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine followed by an infusion of 0.125% at a rate of 14 ml/hr. Group II (n = 19) received 2 and 6 ml of 2% chloroprocaine followed by an infusion of 0.75% at a rate of 27 ml/hr. Group III (n = 19) received 2 and 6 ml of 1.5% lidocaine followed by an infusion of 0.75% at a rate of 14 ml/hr. None of the three local anesthetics used had any significant effect on baseline fetal heart rate or uterine activity. In cases in which monitoring of fetal heart rate was both technically satisfactory and continuous, late and variable decelerations in fetal heart rate were seen in 10 of 17, 3 of 18, and 2 of 19 of the fetuses in groups I, II, and III, respectively. The incidence was significantly higher in group I than in groups II or III (P less than 0.05). Apgar scores and neonatal acid-base status were equally good in all three groups. Neurologic and adaptive capacity scores did not differ among the three groups of neonates, nor did any of the neonates in the three groups score lower than a control group of 19 neonates whose mothers did not receive any analgesia or medications for labor and delivery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Epidural bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, or lidocaine for cesarean section--maternal and neonatal effects.

The effects of epidural anesthesia on maternal blood pressure, newborn Apgar scores, neonatal acid-base status, and the early neonatal neurobehavioral scale (ENNS) were studied in 54 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. Maternal and neonatal blood levels of the local anesthetics were also determined. Group 1 (n = 16) received 0.75% bupivacaine, group 2 (n = 18) received 3% chloroprocaine, group 3 (n = 11) received 2% lidocaine, and group 4 (n = 9) received 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. The incidence of maternal hypotension did not differ significantly among the four groups. Fetal outcome as determined by Apgar scores, acid-base status, and neurobehavioral testing was equally good in all four groups. At delivery, the fetal/maternal concentration ratio of bupivacaine was 0.27, that of lidocaine without epinephrine 0.48, and that of lidocaine with epinephrine 0.58. Chloroprocaine was detected in 12 maternal samples, in seven umbilical venous samples, and in six umbilical arterial samples. It is concluded that epidural anesthesia as administered in this study had no adverse effect on the newborn Apgar scores, cord acid-base status, or the ENNS.