Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
West J Emerg Med ; 18(3): 544-549, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28435509

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are no existing data on whether performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) predicts success in American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) certification. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of any association between USMLE scores and first-time success on the ABEM qualifying and oral certification examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively collected USMLE Step 1, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores and pass/fail results from the first attempt at ABEM qualifying and oral examinations from residents graduating between 2009 and 2011 from nine EM programs. A composite score was defined as the sum of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores. RESULTS: Sample was composed of 197 residents. Median Step 1, Step 2 CK and composite scores were 218 ([IQR] 207-232), 228 (IQR 217-239) and 444 (IQR 427-468). First-time pass rates were 95% for the qualifying examination and 93% for both parts of the examination. Step 2 CK and composite scores were better predictors of achieving ABEM initial certification compared to Step 1 score (area under the curve 0.800, 0.759 and 0.656). Step 1 score of 227, Step 2 CK score of 225 and composite score of 444 predicted a 95% chance of passing both boards. CONCLUSION: Higher USMLE Step 1, Step 2 CK and composite scores are associated with better performance on ABEM examinations, with Step 2 CK being the strongest predictor. Cutoff scores for USMLE Step 1, Step 2 CK and composite score were established to predict first-time success on ABEM initial certification.


Assuntos
Certificação , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Internato e Residência/normas , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Avaliação Educacional , Previsões , Humanos , Licenciamento em Medicina , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Estados Unidos
3.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 34(2): 271-91, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27133244

RESUMO

Vomiting and abdominal pain are common in patients in the emergency department. This article focuses on small bowel obstruction (SBO), cyclic vomiting, and gastroparesis. Through early diagnosis and appropriate management, the morbidity and mortality associated with SBOs can be significantly reduced. Management of SBOs involves correction of physiologic and electrolyte disturbances, bowel rest and removing the source of the obstruction. Treatment of acute cyclic vomiting is primarily directed at symptom control, volume and electrolyte repletion, and appropriate specialist follow-up. The mainstay of therapy for gastroparesis is metoclopramide.


Assuntos
Gastroparesia , Obstrução Intestinal , Vômito , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Gastroparesia/complicações , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico , Gastroparesia/terapia , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/complicações , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrução Intestinal/terapia , Vômito/diagnóstico , Vômito/etiologia , Vômito/terapia
4.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 11(2): 139-44, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24035123

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a clinical education initiative on the appropriate utilization of screening cervical spine CT in the emergency department. The purpose was to assess if clinical education can produce stricter adherence to the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and improve the utilization of screening CT examinations in the emergency department. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. All adult patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with blunt trauma prompting screening cervical spine CT were eligible. For each study, the requesting clinician completed a survey selecting all clinical indications. CT examinations were evaluated by a board-certified radiologist blinded to survey data. Results were compared with retrospective and prospective studies performed before the institution of the education initiative. RESULTS: Of the 388 cervical spine CT examinations performed, 12 (3.1%) were positive for acute cervical spine injury, compared to only 1.0% before the clinical education program (phase 2). Of the 376 examinations without injury, 13% met all 5 National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria for nonimaging (down from 16.1% in phase 2), and 15 (4%) required no imaging when both National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study and abbreviated Canadian cervical spine rule criteria were applied. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a clinical education initiative resulted in improved adherence to ACR Appropriateness Criteria and improved clinical effectiveness of the studies by increasing fracture detection rate. Initiatives such as these could potentially influence imaging overutilization without burdening emergency department clinicians with excessive roadblocks to image ordering.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Competência Clínica/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/normas , Capacitação em Serviço/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Radiologia/educação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...