Race, age at diagnosis and histological characteristics of lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) and ever-smokers in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: We previously demonstrated in a meta-analysis there was no difference in risk ratio (RR) of lung cancer detected by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening among female never-smokers (NS) and male ever-smokers (ES) in Asia. LDCT screening significantly decreased lung cancer death among Asian NS compared to Asian ES (RR =0.27, P<0.001). Methods: We investigated if race, age at diagnosis, and histology further differentiate lung cancer diagnosed by LDCT among in NS and ES using the 14 studies from our previous meta-analysis. Results: Twelve publications reported relevant data utilized in this study. From five Asian and one international studies, Asian ES had similar risk of lung cancer diagnosed at baseline screening as Asian NS [RR =0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.24] but among non-Asian ES had a 4.56 times significantly higher risk than non-Asian NS (RR =4.56; 95% CI: 2.85-7.28). The baseline incidence of lung cancer in never-smoker (LCINS) was approximately 2.3 times higher among Asian NS than non-Asian NS (0.62% vs. 0.27%, P=0.001). Asian ES had about half the baseline incidence of lung cancer diagnosed as non-Asian ES (0.65% vs. 1.26%). LCINS was diagnosed at 1.98 years younger than ES (95% CI: -3.38 to -0.58) (four studies) and exhibited a higher proportion of adenocarcinoma (ADC) (96.58% vs. 70.37%). Conclusions: Among normal-risk individuals, LCINS had a significantly higher likelihood of being diagnosed among Asians than non-Asians, predominantly manifesting as ADC and diagnosed approximately 2 years younger than ES suggesting that the age limit to initiate lung cancer screening in NS may be set lower compared to LDCT lung cancer screening among ES.

Divarasib in the Evolving Landscape of KRAS G12C Inhibitors for NSCLC.

Kristen Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations are one of the most common oncogenic drivers found in 12-14% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 4% of colorectal cancer tumors. Although previously difficult to target, sotorasib and adagrasib are now approved for previously treated NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutations. In preclinical studies, divarasib was 5 to 20 times as potent and up to 50 times as selective as sotorasib and adagrasib. While sotorasib met its primary endpoint in the phase III second line study against docetaxel, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefit was small and no overall survival (OS) benefit was observed. Adagrasib has demonstrated clinical benefit in the phase I/II KRYSTAL-1 study setting, however, 44.8% of patients reported grade 3 or higher toxicities. Divarasib has been studied in a phase I dose expansion cohort with promising efficacy [objective response (ORR) 53.4% and PFS 13.1 months]. Although most patients reported toxicities, the majority were low-grade and manageable with supportive care. Here we discuss these results in the context of the evolving KRAS G12C landscape.

The Butterfly Flies - Practice Changing Results of PAPILLON, First Line Chemotherapy and Amivantamab for the Treatment of NSCLC Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions are a rare subtype of EGFR mutations that do not respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors developed for sensitizing mutations. In 2021, two drugs, amivantamab and mobocertinib each received FDA accelerated approval for second line use after platinum based therapy. These drugs were then brought to first line setting clinical trials; PAPILLON and EXCLAIM2. PAPILLON, which compared amivantamab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy was positive, whereas EXCLAIM2, which compared mobocertinib to chemotherapy was negative. The PAPILLON regimen received subsequent FDA approval. In this commentary, we review the details of PAPILLON and also discuss why the rival trial, EXCLAIM2, may have failed.

Neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI therapy in Non-Small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I-III are predominantly treated with surgery and combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy. A majority of these studies excluded patients with EGFR and ALK alterations. There are several completed and ongoing trials evaluating neoadjuvant treatment with EGFR-TKI monotherapy, combination therapy with chemotherapy, and combination therapy with immunotherapy. Here, we review completed clinical trials and discuss current ongoing trials' potential benefits, challenges, and future directions in the field.

MARIPOSA: Can Amivantamab and Lazertinib Replace Osimertinib in the Front-Line Setting?

Osimertinib is the current first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC, however, patients frequently relapse due to acquired resistance mutations. Amivantamab is a bispecific antibody against EGFR and MET alterations. Lazertinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against EGFR mutations including common resistance mutations. The MARIPOSA trial was designed to study if the combination of amivantamab plus lazertinib in untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients would provide improved progression-free survival. Here, we discuss the rationale for the study and the early results of MARIPOSA.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (DESTINY-Lung01): primary results of the HER2-overexpressing cohorts from a single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: DESTINY-Lung01 is a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the antitumour activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-overexpressing or HER2 (ERBB2)-mutant unresectable or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results of the HER2-mutant cohort (cohort 2) have been reported elsewhere. Herein, we report the primary analysis of cohorts 1 and 1A, which aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg in patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older with unresectable or metastatic (or both unresectable and metastatic) non-squamous NSCLC who had relapsed following or were refractory to standard treatment or for whom no standard treatment was available, with an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 3+ or 2+ (without known HER2 mutations) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, were enrolled at 20 specialist hospitals in France, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, and the USA. Patients were assigned to cohorts sequentially, first to cohort 1, to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 6·4 mg/kg (cohort 1), then to cohort 1A, to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg, both administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by independent central review and was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all patients who signed an informed consent form and were enrolled in the study. Safety was assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03505710, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment). FINDINGS: Between Aug 27, 2018, and Jan 28, 2020, 49 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (median age 63·0 years [IQR 58·0-68·0], 30 [61%] male, 19 [39%] female, and 31 [63%] White), and from June 16 to Dec 9, 2020, 41 patients were enrolled in cohort 1A (median age 62·0 years [IQR 56·0-66·0], 22 [54%] male, 19 [46%] female, and 31 [76%] White). As of data cutoff (Dec 3, 2021), the median treatment duration was 4·1 months (IQR 1·4-7·1) in cohort 1 and 5·5 months (1·4-8·7) in cohort 1A, and median follow-up was 12·0 months (5·4-22·4) in cohort 1 and 10·6 months (4·5-13·5) in cohort 1A. Confirmed objective response rate by independent central review was 26·5% (95% CI 15·0-41·1; 13 of 49, all partial responses) in cohort 1 and 34·1% (20·1-50·6; 14 of 41; two complete responses and 12 partial responses) in cohort 1A. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (12 [24%] of 49 in cohort 1, none in cohort 1A), pneumonia (six [12%] and two [5%], respectively), fatigue (six [12%] and three [7%], respectively), and disease progression (six [12%] and four [10%], respectively). Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 26 (53%) of 41 patients in cohort 1 and nine (22%) of 49 patients in cohort 1A. Drug-related serious adverse events were reported in ten (20%) patients and three (7%) patients, respectively. Deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in ten (20%) patients in cohort 1 (disease progression in six (12%) patients and bronchospasm, hydrocephalus, respiratory failure, and pneumonitis in one [2%] patient each), and in seven (17%) patients in cohort 1A (due to disease progression in four (10%) patients and dyspnoea, malignant neoplasm, and sepsis in one (2%) patient each). One death due to a treatment-emergent adverse event was determined to be due to study treatment by the investigator, which was in cohort 1 (pneumonitis). Independent adjudication of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis found that drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in ten (20%) patients in cohort 1 (two [4%] grade 1, five [10%] grade 2, and three [6%] grade 5) and two (5%) patients in cohort 1A (one [2%] grade 2 and one [2%] grade 5). An additional patient in cohort 1A had grade 4 pneumonitis after the data cutoff, which was subsequently adjudicated as drug-related grade 5 interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis. INTERPRETATION: Given the low antitumour activity of existing treatment options in this patient population, trastuzumab deruxtecan might have the potential to fill a large unmet need in HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. Our findings support further investigation of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

The Nail in the Coffin?: Examining the KEYNOTE-789 Clinical Trial's Impact.

Targeted therapies, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the emergence of resistance to EGFR TKIs especially the third generation TKIs such as osimertinib remains a major clinical challenge. As a broader strategy for combating resistance, several clinical trials have explored the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)+chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Until now, the ORIENT-31 and IMpower150 trials suggested that ICIs+ chemotherapy may be more effective than chemotherapy alone after failure of EGFR-TKIs (although ORIENT-31 was negative for overall survival [OS] and IMpower150 was a subset analysis, so the study was not powered to detect a difference); however, the CheckMate-722 trial yielded disappointing results. Thus, the results of this global trial KEYNOTE-789 were highly anticipated.

HER2-Mutant Advanced and/or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A US Electronic Health Records Database Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Practice Patterns, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data for advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) are scarce. We aimed to assess treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with HER2-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective nationwide electronic health record study evaluated patient characteristics, treatment patterns, treatment duration, and overall survival for adults with HER2-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC without epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. RESULTS: Of 55 included patients, median (quartile 1 [Q1]-quartile 3 [Q3]) age was 63.0 (58.0-72.0) years, 42 (76%) were women, and 39 (71%) were current/former smokers. In first-line therapy, 14 regimens were used for median (Q1-Q3) duration of 3.1 (2.4-6.2) months, with most patients (n = 39, 71%) receiving platinum-based chemotherapy alone or in combination with other agents. Median (95% CI) overall survival from first-line treatment initiation was 19.0 (12.2-not estimable) months, with no significant association with age, sex, or smoking status. Thirty-five (64%) patients received second-line therapy for median (Q1-Q3) duration of 3.3 (2.0-5.2) months. Fourteen second-line regimens were used; most commonly immunotherapy alone or in combination with other agents (n = 16, 46%). Sixteen (46%) patients received third-line therapy for median (Q1-Q3) duration of 1.9 (1.3-2.7) months. Nine third-line regimens were used, with 7 (44%) patients receiving HER2-directed agents. CONCLUSION: First- and second-line treatments for HER2-mutant NSCLC varied widely and treatment duration was short. The approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for NSCLC supports wider HER2 testing to identify eligible patients for HER2-directed therapy.

Taletrectinib for the treatment of ROS-1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: a drug evaluation of phase I and II data.

INTRODUCTION: While crizotinib and entrectinib have been approved to treat ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), unmet needs remain. These unmet needs include treatment options for patients with resistance mutations and efficacious options even in the presence of brain metastasis while simultaneously avoiding unwanted neurological side effects. AREAS COVERED: Taletrectinib was designed to: improve efficacy; overcome resistance to first-generation ROS1 inhibitors; and address central nervous system penetration while conferring fewer neurological adverse events. All of these features are demonstrated and supported by data from the phase I and the regional phase II TRUST-I clinical trial. Here, we describe the preclinical and clinical characteristics of taletrectinib and evaluate the data from phase I and II studies and review the rationale and design of TRUST-II, a global phase II study of taletrectinib, which is enrolling patients in North America, Europe, and Asia. EXPERT OPINION: Taltrectinib has the potential to improve PFS based on its greater potency against ROS1+ tumors and high CNS penetration. By selectively inhibiting ROS1 wild-type and its resistant mutations over TRKB, taltrectinib has a better safety profile with minimal CNS-related AEs compared to other ROS1+ inhibitors.

Consolidation Osimertinib Versus Durvalumab Versus Observation After Concurrent Chemoradiation in Unresectable EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Durvalumab improves survival when used as consolidation therapy after chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC. The optimal consolidation therapy for patients with EGFR-mutant (EGFRmut) stage III NSCLC remains unknown. METHODS: In this multi-institutional, international retrospective analysis across 24 institutions, we evaluated outcomes in patients with stage III EGFRmut NSCLC treated with concurrent CRT followed by consolidation therapy with osimertinib, durvalumab, or observation between 2015 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS, primary end point) and overall survival (secondary end point). Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) during consolidation treatment were defined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Of 136 patients with stage III EGFRmut NSCLC treated with definitive concurrent CRT, 56 received consolidation durvalumab, 33 received consolidation osimertinib, and 47 was on observation alone. Baseline characteristics were similar across the three cohorts. With a median follow-up of 46 months for the entire cohort, the median duration of treatment was not reached (NR) for osimertinib (interquartile range: NR-NR) and was 5.5 (interquartile range: 2.4-10.8) months with durvalumab. After adjusting for nodal status, stage III A/B/C, and age, patients treated with consolidation osimertinib had significantly longer 24-month rwPFS compared to those treated with durvalumab or in the observation cohorts (osimertinib: 86%, durvalumab: 30%, observation: 27%, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). There was no difference in rwPFS between the durvalumab and the observation cohorts. No significant difference in overall survival across the three cohorts was detected, likely due to the limited follow-up. Any-grade trAE occurred in 52% (2 [6.1%] grade ≥3) and 48% (10 [18%] grade ≥3) of patients treated with osimertinib and durvalumab, respectively. Of 45 patients who progressed on consolidation durvalumab, 37 (82%) subsequently received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Of these, 14 (38%) patients developed trAEs including five patients with pneumonitis (14%; 2 [5.4%] grade ≥3) and five patients with diarrhea (14%; 1 [2.7%] grade ≥3). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that among patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC with a sensitizing EGFR mutation, consolidation osimertinib was associated with a significantly longer rwPFS compared to durvalumab or observation. No unanticipated safety signals were observed with consolidation osimertinib.

Repotrectinib in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The early-generation ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that are approved for the treatment of ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have antitumor activity, but resistance develops in tumors, and intracranial activity is suboptimal. Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1 TKI with preclinical activity against ROS1 fusion-positive cancers, including those with resistance mutations such as ROS1 G2032R. METHODS: In this registrational phase 1-2 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of repotrectinib in patients with advanced solid tumors, including ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. The primary efficacy end point in the phase 2 trial was confirmed objective response; efficacy analyses included patients from phase 1 and phase 2. Duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety were secondary end points in phase 2. RESULTS: On the basis of results from the phase 1 trial, the recommended phase 2 dose of repotrectinib was 160 mg daily for 14 days, followed by 160 mg twice daily. Response occurred in 56 of the 71 patients (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 68 to 88) with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who had not previously received a ROS1 TKI; the median duration of response was 34.1 months (95% CI, 25.6 to could not be estimated), and median progression-free survival was 35.7 months (95% CI, 27.4 to could not be estimated). Response occurred in 21 of the 56 patients (38%; 95% CI, 25 to 52) with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received one ROS1 TKI and had never received chemotherapy; the median duration of response was 14.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to could not be estimated), and median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 19.6). Ten of the 17 patients (59%; 95% CI, 33 to 82) with the ROS1 G2032R mutation had a response. A total of 426 patients received the phase 2 dose; the most common treatment-related adverse events were dizziness (in 58% of the patients), dysgeusia (in 50%), and paresthesia (in 30%), and 3% discontinued repotrectinib owing to treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Repotrectinib had durable clinical activity in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, regardless of whether they had previously received a ROS1 TKI. Adverse events were mainly of low grade and compatible with long-term administration. (Funded by Turning Point Therapeutics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb; TRIDENT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03093116.).

Severity of Financial Toxicity for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy.

Introduction: Financial toxicity has negative implications for patient well-being and health outcomes. There is a gap in understanding financial toxicity for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A review of patients treated with palliative RT was conducted from January 2021 to December 2022. The FACIT-COST (COST) was measured (higher scores implying better financial well-being). Financial toxicity was graded according to previously suggested cutoffs: Grade 0 (score ≥26), Grade 1 (14-25), Grade 2 (1-13), and Grade 3 (0). FACIT-TS-G was used for treatment satisfaction, and EORTC QLQ-C30 was assessed for global health status and functional scales. Results: 53 patients were identified. Median COST was 25 (range 0-44), 49% had Grade 0 financial toxicity, 32% Grade 1, 15% Grade 2, and 4% Grade 3. Overall, cancer caused financial hardship among 45%. Higher COST was weakly associated with higher global health status/Quality of Life (QoL), physical functioning, role functioning, and cognitive functioning; moderately associated with higher social functioning; and strongly associated with improved emotional functioning. Higher income or Medicare or private coverage (rather than Medicaid) was associated with less financial toxicity, whereas an underrepresented minority background or a non-English language preference was associated with greater financial toxicity. A multivariate model found that higher area income (HR .80, P = .007) and higher cognitive functioning (HR .96, P = .01) were significantly associated with financial toxicity. Conclusions: Financial toxicity was seen in approximately half of patients receiving palliative RT. The highest risk groups were those with lower income and lower cognitive functioning. This study supports the measurement of financial toxicity by clinicians.

Oncogenic fusions: Targeting NTRK.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is responsible for the highest number of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Thankfully, advancements in the detection and targeting of gene mutations have greatly improved outcomes for many patients. One significant mutation driving oncogenesis in various cancers, including NSCLC, is the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion. Presently, larotrectinib and entrectinib are the only FDA-approved therapies for NTRK-mutated cancers. Despite the efficacy and tolerability exhibited by these therapies, several clinical hurdles persist for physicians, including resistance mutations and limited penetration of the central nervous system (CNS), which diminishes their effectiveness. The treatment landscape for NTRK cancers is still being explored, with numerous new tyrosine kinase inhibitors currently in development or undergoing phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. In this review, we delve into both established and novel therapies targeting NTRK-mutated NSCLC.

Comprehensive Review of ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors-Classified by Structural Designs and Mutation Spectrum (Solvent Front Mutation [G2032R] and Central ß-Sheet 6 [Cß6] Mutation [L2086F]).

Despite ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC accounting for approximately 1% to 2% of NSCLC, there is a long list of ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) being developed in addition to three approved ROS1 TKIs, crizotinib, entrectinib and repotrectinib. Here, we categorized ROS1 TKIs by their structures (cyclic versus noncyclic) and inhibitory abilities (active against solvent front mutation G2032R or central ß-sheet #6 [Cß6] mutation L2086F) and summarized their reported clinical activity in order to provide a dashboard on how to use these ROS1 TKIs in various clinical situations. In addition, the less known Cß6 mutation ROS1 L2086F confer resistances to next-generation ROS1 TKIs (repotrectinib, taletrectinib, and potentially NVL-520) that can be overcome by cabozantinib as documented in published patient reports and potentially by certain L-shaped type I ROS1 TKIs including ceritinib and gilteritinib, which is approved as a FLT3 inhibitor for relapsed refractory FLT3+ acute myeloid leukemia but have published preclinical activites against ROS1 (and ALK). Future clinical trials should investigate cabozantinib and gilteritinib to repurpose them as ROS1 TKIs that can target ROS1 L2086F Cß6 mutation.

Stage as the Sole "Biomarker" for Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resected Stage IB to IIIA NSCLC without Considerations for PD-L1 Expression Level, ALK/EGFR Mutational Status, and Prior Adjuvant Chemotherapy per FDA Approval Indications of PEARLS/Keynote-091?

One of the most recent advancements in NSCLC was the approval of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting. Both atezolizumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for the use in early stage NSCLC patients post resection. As it broadens the options for our patients, multiple approvals in the same setting are generally welcomed. However, there were important differences in the two studies that led to the approvals and the data could be confusing. Here we review IMpower010, the study that led to the first approval of atezolizumab in the adjuvant setting with comparison to the Keynote-091 study evaluating pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting, gaining the most recent FDA approval for adjuvant use in early stage NSCLC.

The development of amivantamab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitizing oncogenic driver mutations benefit from targeted therapies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are highly effective against classic sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, such as exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R point mutations. Conversely, EGFR exon 20 insertions (exon20ins) are resistant to the traditional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In May 2021, the US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) provided accelerated approval to amivantamab (Rybrevant) in adults with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon20ins after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Amivantamab was the first EGFR/MET bispecific antibody to be approved specifically for EGFR exon20ins where there was an unmet need. Furthermore, amivantamab is being evaluated in additional settings such as post osimertinib in sensitizing EGFR mutations as well as in MET altered NSCLC. Here we discuss amivantamab in regard to its mechanism of action, preclinical and clinical data, and clinical impact for patients with EGFR exon20ins NSCLC and beyond.

Osimertinib tolerance in a patient with Stevens Johnson syndrome during osimertinib therapy after treatment with pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib has emerged as an important tool in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with certain activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, Osimertinib may cause adverse effects, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The risk of certain adverse effects may be increased in the setting of recent use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, although it is unclear whether recent use of ICI therapy is a risk factor for Osimertinib-induced SJS specifically. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a patient with EGFR L858R mutation-positive metastatic NSCLC who developed Osimertinib-induced SJS after recent administration of eight cycles of a pembrolizumab-containing chemotherapy regimen. Osimertinib, which was the best treatment targeting his lung cancer, was avoided due to history of SJS. Four years later, because of unresponsiveness or side effects of alternative treatments, he underwent Osimertinib challenge and tolerated it. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of multi-disciplinary care and supports the hypothesis that the risk of SJS to Osimertinib is significantly higher in the context of recent administration of ICI therapy and, patients may tolerate Osimertinib after certain time has elapsed after the last dose of ICI.

Pan-tumor survey of ROS1 fusions detected by next-generation RNA and whole transcriptome sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Two ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been approved for ROS1 fusion positive (ROS1+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors. We performed a pan-tumor analysis of the incidence of ROS1 fusions to assess if more ROS1+ patients who could benefit from ROS1 TKIs could be identified. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ROS1 positive solid malignancies identified by targeted RNA sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing of clinical tumor samples performed at Caris Life Science (Phoenix, AZ). RESULTS: A total of 259 ROS1+ solid malignancies were identified from approximately 175,350 tumors that underwent next-generation sequencing (12% from targeted RNA sequencing [Archer]; 88% from whole transcriptome sequencing). ROS1+ NSCLC constituted 78.8% of the ROS1+ solid malignancies, follow by glioblastoma (GBM) (6.9%), and breast cancer (2.7%). The frequency of ROS1 fusion was approximately 0.47% among NSCLC, 0.29% for GBM, 0.04% of breast cancer. The mean tumor mutation burden for all ROS1+ tumors was 4.8 mutations/megabase. The distribution of PD-L1 (22C3) expression among all ROS1+ malignancies were 0% (18.6%), 1%-49% (29.4%), and ≥ 50% (60.3%) [for NSCLC: 0% (17.8%); 1-49% (27.7%); ≥ 50% (53.9%). The most common genetic co-alterations of ROS1+ NSCLC were TP53 (29.1%), SETD2 (7.3%), ARIAD1A (6.3%), and U2AF1 (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: ROS1+ NSCLC tumors constituted the majority of ROS1+ solid malignancies with four major fusion partners. Given that > 20% of ROS1+ solid tumors may benefit from ROS1 TKIs treatment, comprehensive genomic profiling should be performed on all solid tumors.