Circulating cell-free DNA methylation patterns as non-invasive biomarkers to monitor colorectal cancer treatment efficacy without referencing primary site mutation profiles.

This study investigates methylation patterns in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) for their potential role in colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and the monitoring of treatment response. Through methylation microarrays and quantitative PCR assays, we analyzed 440 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and an additional 949 CRC samples. We detected partial or extensive methylation in over 85% of cases within three biomarkers: EFEMP1, SFRP2, and UNC5C. A methylation score for at least one of the six candidate regions within these genes' promoters was present in over 95% of CRC cases, suggesting a viable detection method. In evaluating ccfDNA from 97 CRC patients and 62 control subjects, a difference in methylation and recovery signatures was observed. The combined score, integrating both methylation and recovery metrics, showed high diagnostic accuracy, evidenced by an area under the ROC curve of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.86 to 0.94). While correlating with tumor burden, this score gave early insight into disease progression in a small patient cohort. Our results suggest that DNA methylation in ccfDNA could serve as a sensitive biomarker for CRC, offering a less invasive and potentially more cost-effective approach to augment existing cancer detection and monitoring modalities, possibly supporting comprehensive genetic mutation profiling.

Neutrophil­to­lymphocyte ratio before each chemotherapy line predicts clinical outcomes in patients with unresectable gastric cancer.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a well-known prognostic biomarker for patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, for patients with GC treated with palliative chemotherapy, the predictive values of NLR remain obscure. Therefore, the present study evaluated the clinical impact of NLR in patients with GC treated with a series of chemotherapies. The present study retrospectively evaluated 83 patients with unresectable GC who received a series of chemotherapies. NLR in the blood was calculated before each chemotherapy initiation (before 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-line treatment). Of the 83 patients enrolled, 56 patients (67%) received 2nd-line chemotherapy and 34 patients (41%) received 3rd-line chemotherapy. NLR at 1st-line ranged from 0.72 to 48.9 (median NLR, 3.00). Therefore, the median NLR of 3.00 was used as a definite cut-off value throughout the present study. All patients were dichotomized into NLR-high (>3.00) and NLR-low group (<3.00) by NLR evaluated before each line of chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) time of the low-NLR group was better than that of the high-NLR group from 1st-line to 3rd-line treatment (1st-line: 18.1 vs. 8.0 months, P=0.06; 2nd-line: 10.7 vs. 4.5 months, P=0.0001; 3rd-line: 8.7 vs. 4.7 months, P=0.003). Of the 24 patients treated with 3rd-line nivolumab, patients with low NLR exhibited better OS than those with high NLR (8.3 months in low-NLR and 6.6 months in high-NLR, P=0.06). In conclusion, NLR should be performed before each chemotherapy line in the clinical setting and may predict outcomes in patients with unresectable GC, including those treated with nivolumab.

Genomically Stable Gastric Cancer Characterized by Hypomethylation in Wnt Signal Cascade.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is divided into four subtypes by their molecular features linked with genetic alterations, e.g., Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high), chromosomal instability (CIN), and genomically stable (GS), called as TCGA classification. In this study, we tried to clarify the epigenetic features of the four GC subtypes according to aberrant methylation status in 23 loci. METHODS: A total of 98 gastric cancers and their normal gastric mucosa samples were included in this study. We divided gastric cancers into TCGA subtypes which were determined in line with MSI-high, EBV, CIN, to GS by their molecular features. The 13 loci of polymorphic microsatellite sequences were used to determine loss of heterogeneity for the detection of CIN. The MSI status was determined by three mononucleotide repeat markers. Infection of EBV was determined by recovering EBV BNRF1 sequence from genomic DNA collected from gastric cancers. Methylation status of 23 loci was investigated by the combined bisulfite restriction analysis. Status of other findings, e.g., KRAS mutations, HER2 expression status, and infection of helicobacter pylori were confirmed. RESULTS: Gastric cancers were divided into MSI (13%), EBV (7%), CIN (53%), and GS (27%). By histological classification, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was more in tumors categorized in MSI-high, and GS and signet-ring cell carcinoma (sig) were more in GS. Among the 23 loci investigated their methylation status, 18 loci were significantly hypermethylated in caner tissues. An unsupervised clustering divided gastric cancers into two clusters and revealed that most GS tumors clustered together in a cluster that exhibited lower methylation levels, distinct from the other subtypes. The inter-variable clustering revealed that a cluster contained the three loci (SFRP2-region 1/2 and APC) belonging to the Wnt signal cascade (Wnt-associated loci). The mean methylation score of Wnt-associated loci was the lowest in GS tumors (MSI-high: 2.7 [95% confidence interval, 2.3-2.9]; EBV: 2.1 [1.2-3.1]; CIN: 2.4 [2.2-2.7]; GS: 1.3 [0.8-0.7]). In contrast, the mean methylation score of the other 15 loci was significantly higher in MSI-high, while that in GS was as same as that in EBV or CIN (MSI-high: 10.4 [8.3-12.4]; EBV: 5.7 [1.7-9.7]; CIN: 4.4 [3.6-5.1]; GS: 3.4 [2.2-4.6]). Additionally, the lower methylation score of Wnt-associated loci was observed only in sig tumors. CONCLUSIONS: GS subtype tumors have the potential to possess distinct signatures in DNA hypomethylation profiles in Wnt signaling pathway, especially in sig.

Multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of the continuous use of panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI after FOLFOX for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Exploratory sequential examination of acquired mutations in circulating cell-free DNA.

This multicenter single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted panitumumab usage combined with cytotoxic doublets for unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Additionally, clinical value of the RAS/BRAF mutation status in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) was evaluated; this evaluation was measured independently of the protocol treatment. Eligible patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who had received the first-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX treatment were recruited and administered continuous panitumumab combined with FOLFIRI. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months was the primary endpoint, with threshold and expected values of 35% and 50%, respectively. In total, 54 patients were enrolled between October 2017 and October 2019. The crude 6-month PFS rate was 37.0%, with a 4.8-month median PFS. The response rate and disease control rate were 16.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Notably, of the 54 participants, 17 showed RAS/BRAF mutations until the end of the protocol treatment and of the 22 patients with progressive disease as their best response, 10 possessed RAS/BRAF mutations in their plasma ccfDNA at baseline. The median PFS significantly differed among patients harboring tumors with BRAF and RAS mutations and those with wild-type tumors. In conclusion, our study failed to show the expected efficacy of the continuous panitumumab use in the second-line treatment. Liquid biopsy discriminated the duration of PFS according to the mutation status. The effectiveness of continuous treatment with panitumumab should be evaluated in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC determined by liquid biopsy at the start of the second-line treatment.

Phase 3 trial of sequential versus combination treatment in colorectal cancer: The C-cubed study.

BACKGROUND: An optimal treatment strategy using oxaliplatin and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer has not been defined. We investigated whether the sequential treatment using fluoropyrimidines with bevacizumab followed by the addition of oxaliplatin at first progression was better than a combination treatment using fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin with bevacizumab. METHODS: In the sequential treatment, the escalation from fluoropyrimidines plus bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidines plus oxaliplatin with bevacizumab was recommended in case of progressive disease. Time to failure of strategy was the primary end-point, whereas the secondary end-points were overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate and safety. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomised to receive either the sequential treatment (n = 151) or the combination treatment (n = 149). The sequential treatment was superior to the combination treatment about time to failure of strategy (15.2 months; 95% CI, 12.5-17.2 months vs. 7.8 months: 95% CI, 6.3-9.5 months; P < 0.001). However, the median overall survival was 27.5 (95% CI, 24.4 to 32.7) months in the sequential treatment and 27.0 (95% CI, 22.8 to 36.0) months in the combination treatment (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.28; P = 0.61). The overall response rate was 33.1% in the sequential treatment arm and 51.7% in the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the extension of the sequential treatment starting from fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab to selected patients who do not need an objective response to the threatening disease.

A Trial Protocol of Precision Medicine for Patients with RAS Wild Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Liquid Biopsy (RAS-liquid Study): A Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy has been identified to prolong the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients without RAS mutations. However, its efficacy is not always consistent for these patients. Genomic profiles of primary tumors and metastases are not always concordant; thus, chemotherapeutic agents can alter the tumor molecular profile. This molecular heterogeneity may explain resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel, non-invasive diagnostic tool that can accommodate this molecular heterogeneity, providing a comprehensive, real-time view of the molecular landscape. In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of genomic mutations in ctDNA for primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study of mCRC patients with wild-type tissue RAS treated with cytotoxic agents and anti-EGFR antibodies as first-line therapy. Genomic mutations, including RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and EGFR in ctDNA, are assessed via Droplet Digital PCR before starting chemotherapy and every 3 months thereafter until disease progression. The target sample size is estimated to be 100. The primary endpoint is the response rate in patients without RAS mutation in their blood sample before starting chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: This study will clarify the predictive value of baseline RAS mutation in ctDNA for responses to anti-EGFR therapy; the frequency of emerging RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and EGFR mutations in ctDNA; and the association with secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in first-line therapy for wild-type tissue RAS mCRC patients.

Technique of vessel-skeletonized parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for the oncological treatment of bilobar colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: To aid in the oncological management of multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), we describe a new surgical procedure, VEssel-Skeletonized PArenchyma-sparing Hepatectomy (VESPAH). STUDY DESIGN: Of 152 patients with CRLMs treated with hepatectomy, 33 patients had multiple bilobar liver metastases (≥8 liver metastases); their surgical procedures and clinical outcomes were retrospectively summarized and compared between those who underwent VESPAH and those who underwent major hepatectomy (Major Hx). RESULTS: Of the 33 patients, 20 patients were resected by VESPAH (the VESPAH group) and 13 patients by major hepatectomy (Major Hx group). The median number of CRLMs was 13 (range, 8-53) in the VESPAH group and 10 (range, 8-41) in the Major Hx group (P=0.511). No operative mortality nor severe morbidity was observed in either group. The VESPAH group showed earlier recovery of remnant liver function after surgery than the Major Hx group; the incidence of grade B/C post hepatectomy liver failure was 5% in the VESPAH group and 38% in the Major Hx group, P=0.048). Intrahepatic tumor recurrence was confirmed in 14 (70%) and 7 (54%) patients in the VESPAH and Major Hx groups, respectively (P=0.416). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) after hepatectomy between the two groups; the median OS was 47 months in the VESPAH group and 33 months in the Major Hx group (P=0.481). The VESPAH group showed the higher induction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy within 2 months after surgery (P=0.002) and total number of repeat hepatectomy for intrahepatic recurrence (P=0.060) than the Major Hx group. CONCLUSIONS: VESPAH enables us to clear surgical navigation by hepatic vessel skeletonization and may enhance patient tolerability of not only adjuvant chemotherapy but also repeat hepatectomies during the patients' lifetimes.

Erratum: Adoptive immunotherapy for gastric cancer using zoledronate-activated killer cells: A prospective observational study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2125.].

Concordance of acquired mutations between metastatic lesions and liquid biopsy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

AIM: To evaluate whether PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide can examine the concordance between liquid biopsy and metastatic lesions with acquired resistance. MATERIALS & METHODS: We examined acquired mutations in chemoresistant lesions and blood obtained from four patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. RESULTS: In one patient, metastatic lesions harbored diverse acquired mutations in KRAS in all seven metastases; the two acquired mutations were detectable in blood collected after the patient acquired resistance. None of the other patients exhibited liquid biopsy mutations, except one, with a BRAF mutation confirmed in primary tumor and peritoneal dissemination. CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsy based on PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide is a successful procedure for capturing acquired mutations with precise information on the RAS mutational spectrum.

Clinical and epigenetic features of colorectal cancer patients with somatic POLE proofreading mutations.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the POLE gene result in an ultra-hypermutated phenotype in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the molecular characterisation of epigenetic alterations remains unclear. We examined the genetic and epigenetic profiles of POLE-mutant CRC to elucidate the clinicopathological features of the associated genetic and epigenetic alterations. RESULTS: Tumour tissues (1,013) obtained from a cohort of patients with CRC were analysed to determine associations between the proofreading domain mutations of POLE with various clinicopathological variables, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, and the methylation status of key regions of MLH1, MGMT, and SFRP2 promoters by calculating the methylation scores (range 0-6). Only four cases (0.4%) exhibited pathogenic POLE hotspot mutations (two p.P286R [c.857C > G], one p.V411L [c.1231G > C], and p.S459F [c.1376C > T] each), which were mutually exclusive to BRAF and KRAS mutations and MSI. CRC patients were divided into four subgroups: patients with POLE mutations (POLE, 0.4%, n = 4), patients with both MSI and extensive methylation in MLH1 (MSI-M, 2.9%, n = 29), patients with MSI but no extensive methylation in MLH1 (MSI-U, 3.6%, n = 36), and patients without MSI (non-MSI, 93.2%, n = 944). The POLE group was younger at diagnosis (median 52 years, P < 0.0001), with frequent right-sided tumour localisation (frequency of tumours located in the right colon was 100%, 93.1%, 36.1%, and 29.9% in POLE, MSI-M, MSI-U, and non-MSI, respectively; P < 0.0001), and was diagnosed at an earlier stage (frequency of stages I-II was 100%, 72.4%, 77.8%, and 46.6% in POLE, MSI-M, MSI-U, and non-MSI, respectively, P < 0.0001). The mean methylation score in POLE was not different from that in MSI-U and non-MSI, but the methylation signature was distinct from that of the other subgroups. Additionally, although the examined number of POLE-mutant tumours was small, the number of CD8-positive cells increased in tumours with partial methylation in the MLH1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients with POLE proofreading mutations are rare. Such mutations are observed in younger individuals, and tumours are primarily located in the right colon. Diagnosis occurs at an earlier stage, and distinct epigenetic alterations may be associated with CD8 cell infiltration.

A phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as initial chemotherapy for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: TRICC1414 (BeTRI).

PURPOSE: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is regarded as a first-line therapeutic option for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated mCRC harboring UGT1A1 wild (*1/*1), or single-hetero (*1/*6 or *1/*28) genotypes. METHODS: Twelve cycles of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab were administered to patients with untreated mCRC. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) assessed by central independent reviewers. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), relative dose intensity (RDI), R0 resection rate, and safety. The exploratory objectives were early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR). RESULTS: Of the 47 patients enrolled, 46 and 44 patients were eligible for the safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. The primary endpoint was met. The ORR was 63.6% (95% CI 47.8-77.6). At a median follow-up of 25.4 months, median TTF, PFS, and OS was 8.1, 15.5, and 34.4 months, respectively. The median RDI of 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab was 72, 69, 62, and 71%, respectively. R0 resection rate was 22.7%. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥ 10%) included neutropenia (65.2%), febrile neutropenia (26.1%), leukopenia (23.9%), anorexia (10.9%), nausea (10.9%), and diarrhoea (10.9%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. ETS and DoR were 70.5 and 45.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab induction treatment of Japanese patients was shown to be beneficial and manageable, although caution is required since the treatment causes febrile neutropenia.

The PVT1 lncRNA is a novel epigenetic enhancer of MYC, and a promising risk-stratification biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Accumulating evidence suggests that dysregulation of transcriptional enhancers plays a significant role in cancer pathogenesis. Herein, we performed a genome-wide discovery of enhancer elements in colorectal cancer (CRC). We identified PVT1 locus as a previously unrecognized transcriptional regulator in CRC with a significantly high enhancer activity, which ultimately was responsible for regulating the expression of MYC oncogene. High expression of the PVT1 long-non-coding RNA (lncRNA) transcribed from the PVT1 locus was associated with poor survival among patients with stage II and III CRCs (p < 0.05). Aberrant methylation of the PVT1 locus inversely correlated with the reduced expression of the corresponding the PVT1 lncRNA, as well as MYC gene expression. Bioinformatic analyses of CRC-transcriptomes revealed that the PVT1 locus may also broadly impact the expression and function of other key genes within two key CRC-associated signaling pathways - the TGFß/SMAD and Wnt/ß-Catenin pathways. We conclude that the PVT1 is a novel oncogenic enhancer of MYC and its activity is controlled through epigenetic regulation mediated through aberrant methylation in CRC. Our findings also suggest that the PVT1 lncRNA expression is a promising prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in CRC.

Adoptive immunotherapy for gastric cancer using zoledronate-activated killer cells: A prospective observational study.

For several years, adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) has been performed using autologous zoledronate-activated killer (ZAK) cells to develop a novel modality for cancer treatment. In the current study, data from 50 patients with incurable gastric cancer were analyzed. Patients were treated with AIT using intravenous ZAK cells every 3-4 weeks in combination with chemotherapy of the physician's choice. The possible clinical benefits were subsequently examined. The median overall survival (OS) time of all patients was 7.5 months. In patients that received 5 or more rounds of treatment, the OS was 13.5 months. Additionally, the OS times of 1st, 2nd or later line chemotherapy with ZAK cell AIT were 27.3 months and 13.3 months, respectively. No objective response was observed and the disease control rate was 67.9%. No severe adverse event was recorded. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic Response Modifier analysis revealed possible improvement of quality of life after ZAK cell AIT. Univariate analysis revealed a significant positive association between longer survival times and baseline lymphocyte percentages in white blood cell counts (P<0.001), serum albumin (P=0.001), C-reactive protein (P=0.006), carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 (P=0.010), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P<0.001) and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). Only the GPS value (P=0.024) was a significant survival marker when analyzed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Although the results cannot provide a definitive conclusion, the current suggested that ZAK cell AIT in combination with chemotherapy is safe, feasible and may be a promising treatment option for patients with incurable gastric cancer. The GPS value at baseline may be a potential biomarker for chemo-immunotherapy.

Molecular Characterization of Second Primary Endometrial Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The objective of this study was to determine the molecular and clinicopathological features, as well as the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer (EC) having prior malignancy (second primary EC: SPEC) compared with those without a history of prior malignancy (first primary EC: FPEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 294 FPEC patients and 32 SPEC patients who had undergone surgical resection with curative intent. EC was divided into four groups according to Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) classification. RESULTS: SPEC patients having greater than a 10-year interval from prior malignancy had risk factors including type II histology, deeper myometrial invasion, cervical invasion, and copy number high (CNH) phenotype compared with patients having less than a 10-year interval (p=0.007, p=0.002, p=0.015 and p=0.001). CONCLUSION: SPEC patients having greater than a 10-year interval from prior malignancy possessed numerous high-risk factors for EC.

[A New Era of Colorectal Cancer Treatment Being Led by a Precise Analysis of Somatic Mutational Profiles Including RAS, BRAF Mutation and Microsatellite Instability Status].

In Japan, clinically, a decade has passed since KRAS exon 2 hotspot mutations could be measured as a companion diagnostic agent of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody to treat unresectable advanced colorectal cancer. Till now, not only KRAS exon 2, but also KRAS exon 3, 4 and NRAS exon 2-4 mutation, and BRAF mutation(V600E)are approved as insurance as a companion diagnostics tool. In addition to those somatic mutations observed in Ras-Raf signal cascade, the measurement of microsatellite instability status is also approved as a companion diagnostic to anti-programmed death-1 receptor antibodies. Since these somatic mutational profiles in colorectal cancer cells are measured to determine the propriety of administration of a particular medicine, the results must be appropriately reflected in therapy for each patient. In this review, I will summarize the feature of clinical characteristics belonging to each somatic mutational profile commonly observed in colorectal cancer, and discuss howsuch somatic mutational profiles including RAS, BRAF mutation, and microsatellite instability status bring us to a newera of colorectal cancer.

Upregulation of microRNA-31 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) manifests after the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations along with tumor microenvironments. MicroRNA (miRNA/miR) molecules have been revealed to serve in critical roles in the progression various types of cancer, and their expression level is often an important diagnostic, predictive or prognostic biomarker. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of miRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for patients with advanced CRC. miRNA arrays were performed on CRC specimens obtained from tumors with various molecular statuses [e.g. KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS)/B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)/microsatellite instability (MSI)], and their paired normal mucosal specimens. The miRNA array revealed that miR-31-5p (miR-31) was specifically upregulated in CRCs with the BRAF V600E mutation, the results of which were supported by subsequent analysis of a dataset retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, which contained information regarding 170 patients with CRC including 51 BRAF-mutant CRCs. Of our cohort of 67 patients with stage IV CRC, 15 (22%) and 4 (6%) showed KRAS and BRAF V600E mutations, respectively. Since the median miR-31 expression was 3.45 (range, 0.004-6330.531), the cut-off value was chosen as 3.5, and all tumors were categorized into two groups accordingly (high-/low-miR-31 expression). The high miR-31 expression group (n=33) was significantly associated with a poorer mortality (univariate hazard ratio=2.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.95; P=0.03) and exhibited a shorter median survival time (MST; 20.1 months) compared with the low miR-31 expression group (n=34) (MST, 38.3 months; P=0.03), indicating that miR-31 is a promising prognostic biomarker for patients with advanced CRC. Thus, performing a functional analysis of miR-31 expression may lead to the development of new targeted therapies for the various genetic subtypes of CRC.

The relationship between peripheral neuropathy and efficacy in second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a prospective observational multicenter study protocol (IVY).

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel is used in second-line conventional chemotherapies to manage patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is a known adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Additionally, oxaliplatin which causes irreversible peripheral neuropathy is now commonly used in first-line chemotherapy for advanced GC in Japan. Thus, examining the incidence of peripheral neuropathy with paclitaxel after oxaliplatin is necessary to improve the quality of life and outcomes of patients with advanced GC in the second-line treatment setting. METHODS: This prospective observational multicenter study, (which we named IVY study), will evaluate the degree of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced GC. A patient neurotoxicity questionnaire (PNQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to assess CIPN during the second-line treatment. The key eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) unresectable or recurrent GC histologically confirmed to be primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach, 2) age over 20 years, 3) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2, 4) written informed consent following full study information is provided to the patient, 5) progression or intolerance for first-line chemotherapy comprising fluorinated pyrimidine and platinum anticancer drugs (cisplatin or oxaliplatin) for advanced GC. 6) presence of evaluable lesions as confirmed using a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 200 patients is considered to be appropriate for inclusion in this study. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide some information on CIPN with the sequential usage of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy to paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network's Clinical Trials Registry with the registration number UMIN000033376 (Registered 11 July 2018).

Heterogeneity of Epigenetic and Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition Marks in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Keratin 19 Proficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Keratin 19 (K19) expression is a potential predictor of poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To clarify the feature of K19-proficient HCC, we traced epigenetic footprints in cultured cells and clinical materials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In vitro, KRT19 promoter methylation was analyzed and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine with trichostatin A (TSA) treatment was performed. Among 564 surgically resected HCCs, the clinicopathological relevance of K19-proficent HCCs was performed in comparison with hepatocytic (HepPar-1 and arginase-1), epithelial-mesenchymal transition (E-cadherin and vimentin), biliary differentiation-associated (K7 and NOTCH-1) markers, and epigenetic markers (KRT19 promoter/long interspersed nucleotide element-1 [LINE-1] methylation status). RESULTS: KRT19 promoter methylation was clearly associated with K19 deficiency and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine with TSA treatment-stimulated K19 re-expression, implicating DNA methylation as a potential epigenetic process for K19 expression. After excluding HCCs with recurrence, TNM stage as IIIB or greater, preoperative therapy, transplantation, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, we assessed 125 of 564 HCC cases. In this cohort, K19 expression was found in 29 HCCs (23.2%) and corresponded with poor survival following surgery (p = 0.025) and extrahepatic recurrence-free survival (p = 0.017). Compared with K19-deficient HCCs, lower KRT19 promoter methylation level was observed in K19-proficient HCCs (p < 0.0001). Conversely, HCC with genome-wide LINE-1 hypermethylation was frequently observed in K19-proficient HCCs (p = 0.0079). Additionally, K19 proficiency was associated with K7 proficiency (p = 0.043), and reduced E-cadherin and HepPar-1 expression (p = 0.043 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: K19-proficient HCC exhibited poor prognosis owing to extrahepatic recurrence, with molecular signatures differing from those in conventional cancer stem cells, providing novel insights of the heterogeneity underlying tumor development.

Randomised phase II trial of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (ATOM trial).

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with biologics followed by liver surgery improves the resection rate and survival of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, no prospective study has compared the outcomes of chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BEV) versus cetuximab (CET). METHODS: The ATOM study is the first randomised trial comparing BEV and CET for initially unresectable CRLM. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive mFOLFOX6 plus either BEV or CET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between May 2013 and April 2016, 122 patients were enrolled. Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.2-13.3 months) in the BEV group and 14.8 months (95% CI 9.7-17.3 months) in the CET group (hazard ratio 0.803; P = 0.33). Patients with a smaller-number but larger-sized metastases did better in the CET group. In the BEV and CET groups, the response rates were 68.4% and 84.7% and the resection rates were 56.1% and 49.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although CET achieved a better response rate than BEV for patients with a small number of large liver metastases, both biologics had similar efficacy regarding liver resection and acceptable safety profiles. To achieve optimal PFS, biologics should be selected in accordance with patient conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01836653), and UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000010209).