RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The primary cosmetic and functional outcome following successful upper limb salvage using free tissue transfer can often be unfavourable, which may motivate patients to undergo secondary procedures. In this study, we sought to identify predictors for secondary procedures and to analyse the type and number of these procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent free tissue transfer to the upper extremity between 2010 and 2017 were included in a retrospective cohort study: patients with secondary procedures to optimise the functional and aesthetic flap design (S cohort) vs. control cohort (C cohort). A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors for secondary procedures. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the study (S cohort 36, C cohort 92). All in all, 56 secondary refinement procedures were performed in a mean of eight months after the initial free flap reconstruction. Most of the defects in the S cohort were localised at the hand (53 %), and upper limb salvage was mostly accomplished by fasciocutaneous and adipocutaneous free flaps (S cohort 89 %). The most frequently performed secondary refinement procedures were direct partial flap excision (61 %), followed by liposuction (16 %) and the combination of both (17 %). Furthermore, 64 % of the secondary refinement procedures from the S cohort were combined with further surgical interventions to improve hand function, e. g. tenolysis and arthrolysis. Patients with defects of the hand received secondary procedures 2.4 times more frequently (p = 0.05). Also, patients with a good general health condition (ASA 1 and 2) were six times more likely to undergo a secondary procedure (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Secondary procedures are safe and frequently requested by patients following successful free flap upper limb salvage. In particular, this applies to patients who are in a good health condition and with free flaps to the hand. Therefore, we recommend the implementation of secondary refinement procedures in the reconstructive plan to increase patient compliance and satisfaction.
Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Lipectomia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Salvamento de Membro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Extremidade Superior/cirurgiaRESUMO
In sepsis and burns, ascorbic acid (AA) is hypothesized advantageous during volume resuscitation. There is uncertainty regarding its safety and dosing. This study evaluated high dose AA (HDAA: 66 mg/kg/h for 24 hours) versus low dose AA (LDAA: 3.5 g/days) administration during the first 24 hours in severely burned adults. We conducted a retrospective study comparing fluid administration before and after switching from low dose to HDAA in severely burned adults. A total of 38 adults with burns >20% TBSA, who received either HDAA or LDAA were included in this retrospective study. AA serum concentrations were quantified at 0, 24, and 72 hours postburn. HDAA impact on hemodynamics, acid-base homeostasis, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, resuscitation fluid requirement, urinary output, and the incidence of adverse effects was evaluated; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed. AA plasma levels were 10-fold elevated in the LDAA and 150-fold elevated in the HDAA group at 24 hours and decreased in both groups afterwards. HDAA was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any complications. A significant reduction in colloid fluid requirements was noted (LDAA: 947 ± 1722 ml/24 hours vs HDAA: 278 ± 667 ml/24 hours, P = 0.029). Other hemodynamic and resuscitation measures, as well as secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. HDAA was associated with higher AA levels and lower volumes of colloids in adults with severe burns. The rate of adverse events was not significantly higher in patients treated with HDAA. Future studies should consider prolonged administration of AA.
