Acetylsalicylic Acid Resistance After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The most common conditions leading to death after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations (SPKs) are cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to test the platelet aggregation inhibitor acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) resistance in patients after SPKs, including investigations into the triggering factors. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (22 men, 10 women; overall age, 47.4 ± 8.6 years) were involved in our study and took 100 mg ASA per day. We used optical platelet aggregometry to detect resistance. RESULTS: Resistance occurred in 40.6% of the study group. However, with the use of logistic regression analysis, the examined 24 factors did not show any significant correspondence with resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ASA resistance seems to be higher compared with other groups, but the triggering effect is still unproved. Clarifying this question should be important regarding the mortality- and morbidity-reducing capacity of antiplatelet drugs in the management of cardiovascular conditions.

Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The management of colon injuries that require resection is an unresolved issue because the existing practices are derived mainly from class III evidence. Because of the inability of any single trauma center to accumulate enough cases for meaningful statistical analysis, a multicenter prospective study was performed to compare primary anastomosis with diversion and identify the risk factors for colon-related abdominal complications. METHODS: This was a prospective study from 19 trauma centers and included patients with colon resection because of penetrating trauma, who survived at least 72 hours. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes in patients with primary anastomosis or diversion and identify independent risk factors for the development of abdominal complications. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-seven patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and analysis. Overall, 197 patients (66.3%) were managed by primary anastomosis and 100 (33.7%) by diversion. The overall colon-related mortality was 1.3% (four deaths in the diversion group, no deaths in the primary anastomosis group, p = 0.012). Colon-related abdominal complications occurred in 24% of all patients (primary repair, 22%; diversion, 27%; p = 0.373). Multivariate analysis including all potential risk factors with p values < 0.2 identified three independent risk factors for abdominal complications: severe fecal contamination, transfusion of > or = 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours, and single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis. The type of colon management was not found to be a risk factor. Comparison of primary anastomosis with diversion using multivariate analysis adjusting for the above three identified risk factors or the risk factors previously described in the literature (shock at admission, delay > 6 hours to operating room, penetrating abdominal trauma index > 25, severe fecal contamination, and transfusion of > 6 units blood) showed no statistically significant difference in outcome. Similarly, multivariate analysis and comparison of the two methods of colon management in high-risk patients showed no difference in outcome. CONCLUSION: The surgical method of colon management after resection for penetrating trauma does not affect the incidence of abdominal complications, irrespective of associated risk factors. Severe fecal contamination, transfusion of > or = 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours, and single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis are independent risk factors for abdominal complications. In view of these findings, the reduced quality of life, and the need for a subsequent operation in colostomy patients, primary anastomosis should be considered in all such patients.

Determining which patients require evaluation for blunt cardiac injury following blunt chest trauma.

The objective of this study was to determine prospectively which risk factors require cardiac monitoring for blunt cardiac injury (BCI) following blunt chest trauma. All patients who sustained blunt chest trauma had an electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission to our urban level I trauma center. Those with ST segment changes, dysrhythmias, hemodynamic instability, history of cardiac disease, age > 55 years, or a need for general anesthesia within 24 hours (group 1) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for 24 hours where they were subjected to serial ECGs, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) assays, and echocardiography (ECHO). Those with only mechanism for BCI, i.e., none of the above risk factors (group 2), were admitted to a nonmonitored bed and had a follow-up ECG 24 hours later. A series of 315 patients were admitted with blunt chest trauma during a 17-month period; 144 patients were in group 1 and 171 in group 2. Overall, 22 patients were diagnosed as BCI (+BCI), defined as evolving ST segment changes, dysrhythmias, a CPK-MB index of > 2.5, or hemodynamic instability. Of the 18 +BCI patients in group 1, all were symptomatic (i.e., none was included solely for a cardiac history, age, or need for general anesthesia). Six of these patients required treatment for dysrhythmias, hypotension, or pulmonary edema; one of whom died. Four patients with +BCI were in group 2 and had ECG changes at 24 hours; none of these four had any sequelae from their +BCI. None of the ECHOs demonstrated abnormal wall motion. Patients who sustain blunt chest trauma with a normal ECG, normal blood pressure, and no dysrhythmias on admission require no further intervention for BCI. Patients with ST segment changes, dysrhythmias, or hypotension following blunt chest trauma should be monitored for 24 hours, as this subgroup occasionally requires further treatment for complications of BCI. ECHO adds nothing as a screening test.

Prognosis of penetrating trauma in elderly patients: a comparison with younger patients.

BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that elderly patients have a worse prognosis than their younger counterparts after sustaining blunt trauma. This is due in part to a higher incidence of comorbid conditions as well as less physiologic reserve in an elderly population sustaining largely blunt trauma. We compared the outcome after penetrating trauma in elderly patients to matched "younger" patients to determine whether they had a similarly poor prognosis. METHODS: Elderly patients (> or = 65 years) were identified from our trauma registry. Sex, mechanism of injury, and Abbreviated Injury Score/Injury Severity Score were determined from the registry. Patients presenting with traumatic arrest were excluded. The registry was then searched for patients aged 15 to 40 years with the same sex, mechanism of injury, and Abbreviated Injury Score in each region. A chart review was then performed to determine additional details of their hospital stay. The two groups were then compared using Student's t test and Fisher's exact chi2 test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Eighty-five elderly patients (OLD group) were admitted with penetrating trauma between 1983 and 1998. They were compared with 85 matched young patients (YOUNG group). Each group included 66 male and 19 female patients. In each group, gunshot wounds occurred in 45.9%, stab wounds in 52.9%, and shotgun wounds in 1.2% of patients. The average Injury Severity Score in each group was 5.5 +/- 5.6 (range, 1-29) and the regional Abbreviated Injury Scores were likewise equal in both groups. The OLD patients had an average hospital stay of 6.9 +/- 9.1 days compared with 4.3 +/- 5.7 days in the YOUNG patients (p < 0.05). Twenty-seven OLD patients spent 7.3 +/- 9.2 days in the intensive care unit compared with 19 YOUNG patients who stayed 3.4 +/- 3.2 days (p < .05). A total of 91 comorbidities were identified in 58 OLD patients compared with 18 in 15 YOUNG patients (p < .0001). Eighty-six invasive procedures were performed in the OLD group compared with 96 in the YOUNG group (p = not significant). Nineteen OLD patients (22.3%) and 15 YOUNG patients (17.6%) suffered one or more complications, including death (p = not significant). A total of 91% of surviving OLD patients were discharged to home compared with 100% of surviving YOUNG patients (p < .01). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients who sustain penetrating trauma have more comorbidities than their younger counterparts. This may account for their longer hospital stay and lesser ability to be discharged home. These patients do not have an increased complication rate and should continue to be managed aggressively.

Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages.

This study was undertaken to confirm the safety and efficacy of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) for trauma patients. A prospectively maintained database of all DPLs performed in the past 75 months was analyzed. A red blood cell count of 100,000/mm(3) was considered positive for injury in blunt trauma; 10,000/mm(3) was considered positive for peritoneal penetration in penetrating trauma. Information relative to type of injury, DPL result, laparotomy result and complications, was analysed to determine if DPL was more or less suited to any specific indication or type of patient. Over a 75 month period, 2501 DPLs were performed at our urban level I trauma center. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the above thresholds were 95, 99 and 98%. The majority (2409, 96%) were performed using percutaneous or "closed" seldinger technique. Ninety-two (4%) were performed using open technique because of pelvic fractures, previous scars and pregnancy. Open DPL was less sensitive than closed DPL in patients who sustained blunt trauma (90 vs 95%) but slightly more sensitive in determining penetration (100 vs 96%). Overall, there were 21 complications (0.8%). There was no difference in complication rate between open and closed DPL. In conclusion, DPL remains a highly accurate, sensitive and specific test with an extremely low complication rate. It can be performed either open or closed with comparable results. We recommend its use in the evaluation of both blunt and penetrating trauma.

Optimal prosthetic for acute replacement of the abdominal wall.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two prostheses for use in acute abdominal wall replacement in the presence and absence of peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent full-thickness removal of a 2 x 3 cm portion of their anterior abdominal wall. Twenty rats had intraperitoneal contamination with stool slurry. Ten rats in each group (contaminated and noncontaminated) had a 2 x 3 cm piece of Gore-Tex dual-mesh expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sewn full-thickness to cover the abdominal wall defect. The remaining 10 rats in each group had replacement with a 2 x 3 cm piece of Dexon polyglycolic acid mesh (PGA). The rats were then awakened and returned to their cages. Rats were humanely killed at the end of a 3-week observation period or at the time of fistula formation or evisceration. At necropsy, the density of intraabdominal adhesions was graded on a scale of 0 to 3, and the extent of reepithelialization was noted. Results were analyzed with the Student's t test or Fisher's exact method of chi2 test as indicated. RESULTS: Nineteen PTFE rats and 10 PGA rats survived the observation period, The PTFE rats had significantly fewer adhesions (0.10+/-0.30 vs. 1.27+/-1.49,p < 0.005) and significantly more reepithelialization of their wounds (78.2+/-23.4% vs. 43.6+/-50.4%,p < 0.05) than the PGA rats. Evisceration and fistula formation occurred more frequently in the PGA group. The mortality in the PTFE rats was significantly less than the PGA rats (5% vs. 50%,p < 0.001.) Notably, the contaminated PGA rats had a significantly higher mortality (90%,p < 0.001) than any of the other subgroups. CONCLUSION: PTFE is superior to PGA as a replacement prosthesis for acute abdominal wall defects. There are significantly fewer adhesions, improved epithelialization of the wound, and less morbidity and mortality when PTFE is used. This finding is especially true in the presence of intraperitoneal fecal soilage.

The utility of head computed tomography after minimal head injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients who present with a history of loss of consciousness who are neurologically intact (minimal head injury) should be managed with head computed tomography (CT), observation, or both. METHODS: We prospectively studied patients who presented to our urban Level I trauma center with a history of loss of consciousness after blunt trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. All patients underwent CT of the head and were subsequently admitted for 24 hours of observation. RESULTS: A total of 1,170 patients with minimal head injury were studied during a 35-month period. All patients had Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15 on arrival and had a history of either loss of consciousness or amnesia to the event. Two hundred forty-seven patients (21.1%) were intoxicated with drugs or alcohol on admission; 39 patients (3.3%) had abnormalities detected by CT, including 18 intracranial bleeds; 21 patients (1.8%) had changes in therapy as a direct result of their CT results, including 4 operative procedures. No patient with negative CT results deteriorated during the subsequent observation period. CONCLUSION: CT is a useful test in patients with minimal head injury because it may lead to a change in therapy in a small but significant number of patients. Subsequent hospital observation adds nothing to the CT results and is not necessary in patients with isolated minimal head injury.

Routine preoperative "one-shot" intravenous pyelography is not indicated in all patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: To determine which patients need a "one-shot" intravenous pyelogram (IVP) before laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 15-month period, 240 laparotomies were performed for penetrating trauma at our urban level I trauma center. Prospectively collected data included clinical suspicion of genitourinary injury, results of preoperative IVP, intraoperative findings, and operative decisions influenced by the IVP. RESULTS: Preoperative IVP was performed in 175 patients (73%). Of these, 71 (41%) had suspicion of a renal injury based on the presence of a flank wound or gross hematuria. The IVP was believed to influence operative decisions in six patients, all in this group. Each of these six patients had either a shattered kidney or a renovascular injury and had a nephrectomy performed with the knowledge that a normal functioning kidney was present on the contralateral side. No patient without a flank wound or gross hematuria had an IVP that was judged to be helpful intraoperatively. Preoperative IVP was helpful only in patients with flank wounds or gross hematuria. Nephrectomy was performed in two additional patients who did not undergo IVP, both of whom presented in shock. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative IVP is not necessary in all patients undergoing laparotomy for penetrating trauma. The number of IVPs can be safely reduced by 60% if the indications are narrowed to include only those stable patients with a flank wound or gross hematuria.

A method of determining peritoneal penetration in gunshot wounds to the abdomen.

BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that 98% of gunshot wounds that penetrate the peritoneal cavity cause injuries that require surgical repair. Many gunshot wounds in the vicinity of the abdomen (GSWA) may actually be tangential and not penetrate the peritoneal cavity at all. Patients with such wounds may not require laparotomy. It is important to determine which patients with a potential tangential GSWA actually have penetration of the peritoneal cavity to minimize negative laparotomies. This study was undertaken to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) in the determination of peritoneal penetration for patients who sustain GSWA. METHODS: DPL was performed for all patients who had sustained a GSWA in whom peritoneal penetration was unclear, i.e., patients whose GSWA appeared to be tangential, thoracoabdominal, or transpelvic and for whom a clear indication for laparotomy (shock, peritonitis, etc.) did not exist. Our threshold for a positive DPL was 10,000 red blood cells (RBC)/mm3. A prospective data base was kept with information on the location of the wound, DPL result, findings at laparotomy, and outcome. RESULTS: During a 4-year period, 429 consecutive DPLs were performed for GSWA at our urban Level I trauma center. One hundred fifty DPLs were positive, with more than 10,000 RBC/mm3. Six of these patients were found to have no peritoneal penetration at laparotomy (false-positive). The remaining 144 patients with positive DPLs were found to have operative injuries (true-positive). Of the 279 patients with DPL counts less than 10,000 RBC/mm3, 2 developed indications for laparotomy and were found to have intraperitoneal injuries (false-negative). The remaining 277 patients had no peritoneal injuries (true-negative). This was demonstrated either by laparotomy done for another indication (n = 7) or by uneventful inpatient observation for 24 hours (n = 270). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DPL in determining peritoneal penetration in GSWA is therefore 99, 98, and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients who sustain GSWA for whom peritoneal penetration is unclear, DPL is a sensitive, specific, and accurate test to determine the need for laparotomy. It remains our test of choice when confronted with these patients.

Predictive morphological findings in "zero-hour" biopsies of renal allografts.

"Zero-hour" biopsies of 65 donors have been performed since 1994. Donor kidneys were categorized into five groups based on the morphological findings in "zero-hour" biopsies. No morphological abnormalities were found in 38% of the cases (group 1). Arteriosclerosis was present in 31% of donor kidneys (group 2). Specific morphological alterations, i.e. acute tubular necrosis [21.5%], tubulointerstitial nephritis [6.2%] or glomerulonephritis [3.1%] were detectable in the cases remained (group 3-5). During an average of 336 posttransplant days clinical and histological follow up was performed (50 rebiopsies). Statistical data of mismatch (1.4-2.0), average of donor/recipient age (35-42 years), cold and warm ischaemic time (1290 and 66 min) were comparable in all groups. According to our observations: 1. higher creatinin was found in grafts with arteriosclerosis (group 2) (p < 0.05), 2. there were more non-viable grafts and longer period of delayed graft function in acute tubular necrosis (group 3), 3 higher creatinin, rejections with the need of rehemodialysis were observed in four cases of tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN-group 4). Glomerulonephritis (GN-group 5) grafts had only delayed graft function, however these groups were few for statistical evaluation. Biopsy complication in 1/115 cases was found (rebiopsy induced kidney haemorrhage). In conclusion, "zero-hour" biopsies can be useful and safe tools to predict early graft function. Besides "zero-hour" biopsies help the histological interpretation of consecutive graft rebiopsies.

Computed tomography screens stable patients at risk for penetrating cardiac injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of CT of the chest in diagnosing the presence of cardiac injury in stable patients with penetrating chest injuries. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a convenience sample of stable patients with penetrating thoracic wounds evaluated for hemopericardium using chest CT at an urban level I trauma center. RESULTS: 60 stable patients with penetrating wounds in proximity to the heart underwent CT. Three patients had radiographic evidence of pericardial fluid, and 1 had an equivocal study. These 4 patients underwent subxiphoid pericardial window exploration: 2 had only clear fluid present, the other 2 had hemopericardium. The latter patients had a total of 3 cardiac and 1 diaphragmatic injuries, which were repaired at subsequent sternotomy. None of the 56 patients who had negative CTs had further clinical evidence of cardiac injury. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT in this setting for hemopericardium are 100% (95% CI 18-100%), 96.6% (95% CI 88-100%), and 96.7% (95% CI 89-100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Chest CT may be a useful test for diagnosing the presence of hemopericardium in the setting of penetrating thoracic injury. With the caveat that the patient must be removed from a closely monitored environment, the authors the use of CT in stable patients with penetrating chest wounds whenever echocardiography is unavailable.

Experience with three prosthetic materials in temporary abdominal wall closure.

There are circumstances that make abdominal wall closure unsafe and technically impossible after laparotomy for trauma. In these difficult cases, prosthetic materials may be necessary to temporarily close the abdominal wall. To determine the optimal prosthetic in these instances, a retrospective chart review was conducted in our urban Level I trauma center. Twenty-five patients received 31 abdominal wall prostheses over a 4-year period. There were 7, 8, and 10 patients with 7 Marlex, 9 Dexon, and 15 Goretex prostheses, respectively. Each patient had only one type of prosthesis placed. The average age was 30.7 +/- 12.0 years, injury severity score was 20.3 +/- 7.4, and abdominal trauma index was 35.9 +/- 18.0; there was no significant difference in these values between groups. Eight patients died soon after the prosthesis was placed (average, 12.9 days) secondary to ongoing shock or multiple organ failure. Three of the seven surviving Goretex patients (43%) were intentionally left with small hernias. Three of the six Dexon patients (50%) were left with hernias; one of these eviscerated on day 150 and subsequently died, and the others have disabling gigantic hernias. Three of the four Marlex patients (75%) developed fistulae as a result of erosion into the small bowel or colon. One Marlex patient suffered with a chronically draining abdominal wound for 398 days prior to definitive closure. Goretex appears to be the best prosthetic for temporary abdominal wall closure because it causes less inflammatory reaction because of its smooth surface. It is therefore easier to retrieve at the time of definitive closure and carries less risk of fistula formation than other prostheses. Our Dexon patients suffered with gigantic hernias and one died because of complications of evisceration. We have abandoned the use of Marlex in abdominal wall closure because of the high incidence of fistula formation. We advocate the use of Goretex in temporary abdominal wall closure in this challenging group of patients.

Aspiration of free blood from the peritoneal cavity does not mandate immediate laparotomy.

The objective was to establish the relationship between the aspiration of free blood (+ASP) versus diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), abdominal injury severity, hemodynamic instability, and the need for immediate operative intervention. We prospectively compared the significance of +ASP to +DPL in our level I trauma center. Consecutive patients received sequential needle tap, catheter aspiration (ASP), and DPL. If gross blood was withdrawn during the tap or ASP, it was returned to the peritoneal cavity before completing the DPL. The DPL was considered positive if there were > 100,000 RBCs for blunt injuries or anterior abdominal stab wounds, or > 10,000 RBCs for other penetrating injuries. During a 12-month period, 566 patients fulfilled the study criteria; they were 50 per cent blunt and 50 per cent penetrating trauma. There were 70 patients with both +ASP/+DPL, 30 with -ASP/+DPL and 4 with +ASP but -DPL. Exploratory laparotomy was performed on these 104 patients (18.4%), 22 of which were considered nontherapeutic. The ATI was statistically higher in the +ASP patients (14.9 +/- 12.9 versus 8.5 +/- 8.2, P < 0.05) but was not clinically different. Overall injury severity and hemodynamic stability were not different in the two groups. The sensitivity of DPL at detecting intra-abdominal injury was higher than the ASP group (98% versus 72%), but the specificities were equal (98%). Because +ASP patients are not more critically injured or unstable than +DPL patients, and because DPL is more accurate in detecting the need for operative intervention, aspiration should be abandoned as part of the DPL procedure in patients with abdominal trauma.

Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of early echocardiography in stable patients with penetrating wounds in proximity to the heart. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review over a 1-year period. SETTING: Urban level I trauma center. PATIENTS: 121 clinically stable patients with penetrating wounds in proximity to the heart underwent immediate echocardiography (ECHO). Those with evidence of pericardial effusion then underwent subxiphoid pericardial window (SPW), followed by a median sternotomy if blood was found. RESULTS: Thirty patients had an ECHO that was positive and underwent immediate SPW. One patient with an initially negative ECHO deteriorated 5 hours after admission; a repeat ECHO was positive, and he also underwent SPW. In 16 of the 31 SPW performed, blood in the pericardial sac was confirmed. Of these 16, four had pericardial blood that cleared with irrigation and required no further intervention. The remaining 12 patients underwent exploration: 3 had injury to the pericardium only, 4 had injury to the right atrium, 3 had injury to the right ventricle, and 2 had injury to the left ventricle. All nine myocardial injuries required operative repair; all survived. CONCLUSIONS: Using the protocol of early ECHO and selective pericardial window, no clinically significant injuries were missed. In all, 12 penetrating cardiac injuries were identified and repaired successfully. We have found early and aggressive work-up, as outlined herein, to be helpful in the successful treatment of occult cardiac injuries.

Missile embolization revisited: a rationale for selective management.

Embolization of missiles is an unusual presentation of penetrating trauma. Often the management of these injuries may be quite challenging, and selective management continues to be subject to controversy. We report a case of a bullet embolus to the right ventricle from the internal iliac vein in a 15-year-old boy that was managed with observation. An algorithm for diagnosis and management of this phenomenon mandates exploration of emboli to the aorta and peripheral arteries with repair of the vascular entry site and embolectomy. It also recommends operative intervention for symptomatic venous emboli to the heart and pulmonary circulation. Nonoperative management may be considered in patients with asymptomatic emboli to the right heart or the cerebral and pulmonary circulation.

A comparison of pentastarch and lactated Ringer's solution in the resuscitation of patients with hemorrhagic shock.

Pentastarch is a colloid that is chemically similar to Hetastarch. It has a shorter half-life (12 hr), and produces volume expansion at least 1.5 times the administered volume. We compared Pentastarch to Ringer's lactate in 41 patients (21 Pentastarch, 20 Ringer's lactate) presenting with hemorrhagic shock. The groups were similar in age, sex, race, and type of injury. Significantly less volume of Pentastarch was required initially to resuscitate to a normal blood pressure and urine output than Ringer's lactate (P < 0.005). Coagulation parameters (prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and factor VIII) were measured for 48 hr post-resuscitation, and no abnormalities were noted in the Pentastarch group. Serum albumin was the same in both groups throughout the study period; however, serum colloid oncotic pressure was elevated at 1 hr post-resuscitation in the Pentastarch group (P < 0.005). There was no difference in ventilatory parameters, blood gases, pulmonary function tests, ventilator days, or hospital days between the two groups. We conclude that Pentastarch is safe and effective for the initial resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock.

Surgical treatment of cavernous haemangiomas of the liver.

Cavernous haemangiomas of the liver were surgically treated in 36 women and 14 men over a 10-year period. The tumours were solitary in 42 cases and multiple in 8. Locations were the right lobe in 39 cases, the left one in 5 and both lobes in 6. The size of the tumours ranged from 0.4 to 14 cm in diameter. Enucleation of tumours was carried out in 29 cases, an atypical liver resection in 19 cases, anatomical lobectomy in 2 cases and a right trisegmentectomy in 1 case. There was no mortality. Morbidity rate seems to be lower in patients who underwent enucleation. The authors indicate the importance of enucleation for removal of liver haemangiomas of various sizes.

Perforated duodenal diverticulum.

Duodenal diverticula are present in up to 20 per cent of the population but few patients require surgery for acute complications. Perforation is the rarest of these complications; only 101 affected patients have been reported in the world literature. These reports of perforated duodenal diverticulum are reviewed and strategies for the diagnosis and management of this unusual condition are discussed.