First report on the use of a thinner (125)I radioactive seed within 20-gauge needles for permanent radioactive seed prostate brachytherapy: evaluation of postimplant dosimetry and acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative dosimetry and acute toxicity of new 0.5-mm (125)I seeds in 20-gauge (20G) diameter prostate brachytherapy (PB) needles with standard 0.8-mm seeds in 18G needles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postoperative dosimetry was performed on 100 consecutive PB patients treated with ThinSeeds in 20G needles and compared with 100 consecutively treated PB patients using standard-sized seeds and needles (18G). Dosimetry was performed on postoperative Day 1 CT scans. Acute urinary retention was also compared between these two groups. Acute toxicity was evaluated in 22 consecutively treated patients with thinner seeds/needles and compared with 22 consecutive concurrent patients treated with standard seeds and needles. All patients were evaluated by pre- and post-PB self-administered surveys, physical examinations on post-PB Day 1, and telephone surveys on Day 7. Endpoints included dysuria, acute urinary retention, hematuria, perineal pain/bruising, and International Prostate Symptom Score. RESULTS: Post-PB dosimetric comparison demonstrated that the V100 (95% vs. 91%), D90 (161Gy vs.149Gy), V150 (55% vs. 45%), and RV100 (0.43cc vs. 0.30cc) were significantly (p<0.0004) higher in the 20G group. Urinary retention rates were 8% and 7% and median catheter-dependent durations were 7 and 14 days for the 20G and 18G groups, respectively. No significant differences were found for dysuria, hematuria, or International Prostate Symptom Score. Post-PB Day 1 perineal bruising and pain scores on Days 1 and 7 were significantly less (p<0.04) in 20G cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller diameter needles and seeds resulted in improved post-PB Day 1 V100 and D90 dosimetry, and significantly less acute perineal pain and bruising.

Optimal equations for describing the relationship between prostate volume, number of sources, and total activity in permanent prostate brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is an optimal type of mathematical equation for predicting seed and activity requirements for permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS: Four institutions with extensive brachytherapy experience each submitted details of more than 40 implants. The data was used to generate power and linear equations to reflect the relationship between preimplant volume and the number of seeds implanted, and preimplant volume and the total implant activity. We compared the R and standard error of the generated equations to determine which type of equation better fit the data. RESULTS: For the limited range of prostate volumes commonly implanted (20-60 mL), power and linear equations predict seed and activity requirements comparably well. CONCLUSIONS: Linear and power equations are equally suitable for generating institution-specific nomograms.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy preplanned technique: The modern Seattle method step-by-step and dosimetric outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe, step-by-step, the current Seattle preplan technique, and report the dosimetric outcomes on 1,131 consecutively such treated prostate brachytherapy patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One thousand one hundred thirty one patients with prostate cancer were treated with iodine-125 ((125)I), palladium-103 ((103)Pd), or cesium-131 ((131)Cs) using a preplanned template-guided transrectal ultrasound-guided approach between January 2005 and August 2007. Day one computed tomography (CT) scans were taken for postimplantation dose-volume histogram evaluations. Postoperative prostate contours were drawn by one author (DN) on CT images taken on postoperative day one. RESULTS: The volume of prostate receiving 100% of prescription dose (V(100)) and percent dose to 90% of the prostate (%D(90)) were 95% and 106% for 558 monotherapy (125)I implants, 91% and 102% for 327 (103)Pd implants, and 97% and 111.5% for 13 (131)Cs implants, respectively. The median V(100) and percent D(90) were 91% and 101% for five boost (125)I implants, 92% and 104% for 228 boost (103)Pd implants. The median rectal volume receiving 100% of prescription dose (RV(100)) for (125)I, (103)Pd, and (131)Cs monotherapy implants were 0.3, 0.13, and 0.38cc, and for (125)I and (103)Pd boost implants were 0.16 and 0.13cc, respectively. No patient received an RV(100) of >0.92cc. CONCLUSIONS: Modern preplanned template and ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy can consistently result in excellent prostate dosimetry and rectal sparing.

Inter-institutional variation of implant activity for permanent prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Despite the existence of guidelines for permanent prostate brachytherapy, it is unclear whether there is interinstitutional consensus concerning the parameters of an ideal implant. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Three institutions with extensive prostate brachytherapy expertise submitted information regarding their implant philosophy and dosimetric constraints, as well as data on up to 50 radioiodine implants. Regression analyses were performed to reflect each institution's utilization of seeds and implanted activity. RESULTS: Despite almost identical implant philosophy, target volume, and dosimetric constraints, there were statistically significant interinstitutional differences in the number of seeds and total implant activity across the range of prostate volumes. For larger volumes, the variation in implanted activity was 25%; for smaller glands, it exceeded 40%. CONCLUSIONS: There remain wide variations in implanted activity between institutions espousing seemingly identical implant strategies, prescription, and dosimetry constraints. Brachytherapists should therefore be wary of using nomograms generated at other institutions.