Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis supports patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy (CEA); however, studies indicate considerable variation in practice. The hemodynamic effect of a patch is unclear and this study attempted to elucidate this and guide patch width selection. METHODS: Four groups were selected: healthy volunteers and patients undergoing CEA with primary closure, trimmed patch (5 mm), or 8-mm patch angioplasty. Computer-generated three-dimensional models of carotid bifurcations were produced from transverse ultrasound images recorded at 1-mm intervals. Rapid prototyping generated models for flow visualization studies. Computational fluid dynamic studies were performed for each model and validated by flow visualization. Mean wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) maps were created for each model using pulsatile inflow at 300 mL/min. WSS of <0.4 Pa and OSI >0.3 were considered pathological, predisposing to accretion of intimal hyperplasia. The resultant WSS and OSI maps were compared. RESULTS: The four groups comprised 8 normal carotid arteries, 6 primary closures, 6 trimmed patches, and seven 8-mm patches. Flow visualization identified flow separation and recirculation at the bifurcation increased with a patch and was related to the patch width. Computational fluid dynamic identified that primary closure had the fewest areas of low WSS or elevated OSI but did have mild common carotid artery stenoses at the proximal arteriotomy that caused turbulence. Trimmed patches had more regions of abnormal WSS and OSI at the bifurcation, but 8-mm patches had the largest areas of deleteriously low WSS and high OSI. Qualitative comparison among the four groups confirmed that incorporation of a patch increased areas of low WSS and high OSI at the bifurcation and that this was related to patch width. CONCLUSIONS: Closure technique after CEA influences the hemodynamic profile. Patching does not appear to generate favorable flow dynamics. However, a trimmed 5-mm patch may offer hemodynamic benefits over an 8-mm patch and may be the preferred option.

Migration of fenestrated aortic stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: This article reports the incidence, timing, and related sequelae for proximal and distal migration of the Zenith Fenestrated AAA Endovascular Graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHOD: A prospectively maintained database at a tertiary referral hospital was used to identify 83 patients who underwent endovascular repair using the Zenith fenestrated stent graft. Inclusion criteria included a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan within 6 weeks of implantation and at least one additional follow-up CT scan (>5 months) available electronically at our institution. Eligible patients underwent assessment of stent graft migration using a CT-based central luminal line (CLL) technique. The proximal and distal margins of the stent graft were measured using CLLs relative to vascular landmarks on all available follow-up CT scans. Migration was defined as stent graft movement ≥4 mm. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in this study, mean age was 74 ± 7 years, and 89% were men. Mean preoperative aneurysm diameter was 67 ± 9 mm. In these 55 patients, fenestrations were applied to 162 target vessels with the commonest design accommodating two renal arteries (RAs) and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Median follow-up was 24 (range, 5-97) months; 80% of patients (n = 44) had both the proximal and two distal attachment sites assessed for evidence of migration. Twelve iliac limbs in 11 patients were excluded from analysis due to occlusion of one internal iliac artery precluding CLL assessment (n = 7), or image quality issues (n = 5). Using CLLs and based on those patients who exhibited migration, the median proximal and distal migration distances were +5.0 (range, +4.0 to +8.1) mm and -5.0 (range, -4.3 to -21.3) mm, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis for proximal migration revealed migration rates of 14% and 22% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Distal migration rates were lower at 3% and 8%, respectively. There have been no incidences of late rupture or open conversion. Of the patients with proximal migration, two patients lost a single target vessel (two RAs) and three patients were reported to have target vessel stenosis (two SMAs, one RA). These cases did not require reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Both suprarenal fabric extension and visceral artery stenting are known to provide additional fixation for fenestrated aortic stent grafts. Despite this, minor proximal migration still occurs in up to one quarter of fenestrated endovascular repair patients by 4 years. We believe this is mainly due to the engagement of the barbs of the anchoring stent. Distal migrations occur with lower frequency.

Comparison of fenestrated endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms not suitable for standard endovascular repair.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysms that are unsuitable for a standard endovascular repair (EVAR) could be considered for fenestrated endovascular repair (f-EVAR). The aim of this study was to conduct a risk-adjusted retrospective concurrent cohort comparison of f-EVAR and open repair for such aneurysms. METHODS: All patients who underwent repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm that was unsuitable for a standard EVAR due to inadequate neck within one institution between January 2006 and December 2010 were identified. Case notes were retrieved for clinical data, Vascular Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (V-POSSUM) score, and aneurysm morphology. Computed tomography scans were reviewed to establish aneurysm morphology. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were identified. The open surgery cohort included 54 patients (35 men) who were a median age of 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 9.5; range, 60-86 years). The aortic cross-clamp was infrarenal in 20 patients, suprarenal or above in 21, and inter-renal in eight. Postoperatively, 63 major complications were noted in 30 patients, nine of whom required 16 reinterventions. Cumulative hospital stay of the cohort was 1170 days (median, 12; IQR, 13; range, 1-205 days) of which 234 days (median, 28; IQR, 36; range, 1-77 days) were in the intensive therapy unit (ITU). Perioperative mortality was 9.2% (n = 5), exactly as estimated by V-POSSUM. The f-EVAR cohort included 53 patients (47 men) who were a median age of 76 years (IQR, 11.50; range, 55-87 years). Two fenestrations and one scallop was the most frequent configuration (n = 31). Postoperatively, 37 major complications were noted in 18 patients, six requiring reintervention. Hospital stay was 559 days (median, 7; IQR, 4.5; range, 4-64 days), of which 31 days (median, 4; IQR, 10.5; range, 1-15 days) were in the ITU. Two patients died perioperatively (3.7%), resulting in an observed crude absolute risk reduction of 5.5% compared with open repair. The V-POSSUM estimated perioperative death in five patients (9.4%) in the f-EVAR cohort. In a hypothetic scenario of the f-EVAR cohort undergoing open repair, V-POSSUM estimated seven deaths (13.2%), resulting in an estimated risk-adjusted absolute risk reduction due to f-EVAR of 9.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients, f-EVAR reduced mortality and morbidity substantially compared with open repair and also reduced total hospital stay and ITU utilization.

Guidewire stiffness: what's in a name?

PURPOSE: To measure the stiffness of commonly used "stiff" guidewires in terms of their flexural modulus, an engineering parameter related to bending stiffness. METHODS: Eleven different intact stiff guidewires were selected to undergo a 3-point bending test performed using a tensile testing machine. Testing was performed on 3 new and intact specimens of each guidewire at 10 locations along the wire's length, excluding the floppy tip. The flexural modulus (in gigapascals, GPa) was calculated from the results of the bending test. RESULTS: The flexural modulus of the plain Amplatz wire was 9.5 GPa compared to 11.4 to 14.5 GPa for the "heavy duty" wires. Within the Amplatz family of guidewires, the flexural modulus was 17 GPa for the "stiff," 29.2 GPa for the "extra stiff," 60.3 GPa for the "super stiff," and 65.4 GPa for the "ultra stiff." The Backup Meier measured 139.6 GPa and the Lunderquist Extra Stiff 158.4 GPa. CONCLUSION: The Instructions for Use of some endovascular devices specify a wire type selected from a range of undefined "stiffness" descriptors. These descriptors have little correlation with the measured flexural modulus. Two guidewires with the description "extra stiff" can have a 5-fold difference in flexural modulus. We recommend that guidewire catalogues and packaging include the flexural modulus and that device manufacturers amend their Instructions for Use accordingly.