Validation of post-harvest antimicrobial interventions to control Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on market hog carcass surfaces.

Although swine are less associated with STEC foodborne disease outbreaks, the potential for swine to serve as a source of STEC infections in human beings cannot be disregarded. This study compared eight USDA-approved antimicrobial intervention technologies to quantify their ability to reduce STEC contamination on market hog carcasses. Hogs were harvested to provide skin-on carcass sides, and eight sides (per three replications) were inoculated with a 7-strain STEC cocktail (ca. 5 log CFU/cm2 across all external and body cavity surfaces). Each side was randomly assigned to a final pre-chill wash treatment administered in a commercial Chad carcass cabinet using a low-volume spray [3% lactic acid (lLA; 130 °F), 400 ppm peracetic acid (lPAA), or acidified 400 ppm peracetic acid (laPAA)] or a high-volume wash [ambient water (hAW), 400 ppm PAA (hPAA), 400 or 600 ppm hypobromous acid (hDBDMH), or 71 °C water (hHW)] treatment according to a randomized complete block study design. Post-treatment (after a 10-min hanging drip) and post-chilling (18 h at 2 °C) STEC reductions were compared for external skin-on surfaces and internal body cavity lean surface tissue. Post-treatment color changes were determined for lean, adipose, and skin carcass surfaces before and after chilling. When applied to the external, skin-on surface, the hHW, hPAA, and hDBDMH600 deluge washes were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more effective than the other intervention technologies, achieving STEC reductions of 3.8, 3.4, and 3.2 log CFU/cm2, respectively. In comparison, the hAW control reduced STEC by 1.7-log CFU/cm2 on the external, skin-on surface. The carcass interventions were less effective at reducing STEC populations attached to interior body cavity (diaphragm region), with post-chill populations reduced by 0.9-2.2 log cycles, while the hAW control wash achieved a 0.6-log reduction. None of the treatments negatively impacted instrumental carcass color. While all market hog carcass interventions reduced STEC populations, larger reductions were observed when applied to the external, skin-on surface, with the largest reductions achieved by the hHW, hPAA, and hDBDMH600 deluge washes. These data equip pork processors with the information necessary to support decision-making when selecting an intervention technology.

Measurement of the three-axis vibration, temperature, and relative humidity profiles of commercial transport trailers for pigs.

The objective of this study was to collect and interpret three-axis acceleration, temperature, and relative humidity data from six locations within commercial transport trailers shipping market-weight pigs. Transport was observed in Kansas (n = 15) and North Carolina (n = 20). Prior to loading, three-axis accelerometers were affixed to six locations on the trailers: top fore (TF), top center (TC), top aft (TA), bottom fore (BF), bottom center (BC), and bottom aft (BA) compartments. Data were post-processed to calculate root-mean-square (RMS) accelerations and vibration dose values (VDV) in the vertical direction and the horizontal plane. These values were compared with exposure action values (EAV) and exposure limit values (ELV), vibration levels deemed uncomfortable and potentially dangerous to humans. Additionally, RMS and VDV were compared among the trailer compartments. The vertical RMS accelerations for all compartments exceeded the EAV for loads measured in Kansas, and for the majority of the compartments measured in North Carolina. Many compartments, specifically the BA compartment from all trips, exceeded the vertical ELV. Regardless of where the data were collected, fewer compartments exceeded the EAV in the horizontal orientation. Only BA compartments exceeded the ELV in the horizontal orientation. There were Area × Level interactions for vertical and horizontal RMS and VDV (P < 0.01). The BF compartment had a greater vertical RMS value than the TF, TC, and BC (P < 0.02) compartments, but did not differ (P = 0.06) from the TA compartment. The vertical RMS of the TA compartment did not differ from the TF, TC, and BC compartments (P > 0.13). The BF compartment had a greater (P = 0.02) vertical VDV value than the TC location, but did not differ from the other locations (P > 0.16). All other locations did not differ in vertical VDV (P > 0.12). The BF compartment had greater horizontal RMS than the TC and TA compartments (P < 0.01), but did not differ from TF and BC compartments (P > 0.12). All other compartments did not differ in horizontal RMS (P > 0.34). All compartments, aside from the BA compartment, did not differ in horizontal VDV (P > 0.19). Vibration analyses indicated the BA compartment had the greatest vertical and horizontal vibrations and a large percentage of the compartments exceed the EAV and ELV, which indicated pigs may have experienced uncomfortable trips that could cause discomfort or fatigue.