Effects of icodextrin peritoneal dialysis solution on the peritoneal membrane in the STZ-induced diabetic rat model with partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Application of icodextrin-based peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) provides a potential benefit in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal failure treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) because of better ultrafiltration capacity and avoidance of direct glucose exposure. We examined the effect of glucose and icodextrin-based PDF on histological alterations of peritoneal membranes. METHODS: Thirty-two male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control Wistar rats with non-treated (n = 8), streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats with 5/6 kidney ablation (n = 8), STZ-induced diabetic rats with 5/6 kidney ablation injected with a standard lactate-buffered 4.25% glucose-based PDF (Dianeal; n = 8) and STZ-induced diabetic rats with 5/6 kidney ablation injected with 7.5% icodextrin-based PDF (Extraneal; n = 8). Intraperitoneal injection was performed once daily with an instillation volume of 20 ml per injection during 8 weeks. RESULTS: Chronic high-glucose-based PDF exposure resulted in increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) expression, accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), and up-regulation of the receptor for AGE (RAGE), which were ameliorated in the icodextrin-based PDF group. The peritoneal damages, such as neoangiogenesis and submesothelial fibrosis, were significantly reduced in icodextrin-based PDF compared to high-glucose-based PDF. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term in vivo exposure to high glucose-based PDF promotes the fibrosing process of peritoneal membranes. Icodextrin-based PDF may be helpful in slowing the PDF-induced deterioration of peritoneal function and prolonging the use of peritoneal dialysis in patients with diabetes.

Glycated albumin levels predict long-term survival in diabetic patients undergoing haemodialysis.

AIM: Glycated albumin (GA) is recognized as a reliable marker for monitoring glycemic control particularly in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Here, we investigated the impact of GA levels on long-term survival in diabetic patients with ESRD. METHODS: We enrolled ESRD patients with diabetic nephropathy into our single-centre prospective follow-up study (n = 98, 66 men and 32 women; age 68.2 12.3 years) with a mean follow-up period of 47.7 months. All patients had started haemodialysis between December 1992 and November 2003. They were categorized into two groups according to their GA levels at the initiation of haemodialysis; GA < 29% (low-GA group; n = 54) and GA 29% (high-GA group; n = 44). RESULTS: Between low-GA and high-GA groups, there were no significant differences in various clinical parameters except GA and HbA1c levels. The cumulative survival rate of low-GA group was significantly higher than that of high-GA group (P = 0.034, log-rank test). After adjustment for age, sex, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein and albumin, high-GA was a significant predictor of survival (hazard ratio 1.042 per 1.0% increment of GA, 95% CI 1.014-1.070, P < 0.05), but not in the case with HbA1c. Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated that high-GA group was a significant predictor for cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 2.971 (1.064-8.298), P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: We conclude that poor glycemic control (GA 29%) before starting haemodialysis is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and shortened survival in diabetic patients with ESRD.