Heparin versus danaproid for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), and bleeding complications in patients receiving heparin or danaproid after hemiarthroplasty or osteosynthesis for hip fractures. METHODS: 37 men and 138 women aged 47 to 100 (mean, 80) years underwent either hemiarthroplasty or osteosynthesis for hip fractures; 5 patients with dementia were excluded. All patients received preoperative elastic stocking and postoperative intermittent pneumatic compression. They were divided into 3 groups based on their admission period: controls (n=71), unfractionated heparin (n=44), and danaproid sodium (n=55). Drugs were administered from postoperative day 1 to 7. At day 7, all patients undertook radioisotope venography of the legs and lung perfusion scintigraphy. RESULTS: In the control, heparin, and danaproid groups respectively, the DVT rates were 31%, 9.1%, and 5.5%, and the PTE rates were 5.6%, 4.5%, and 1.8%. Only the DVT rate in the control group was significantly higher than that in the heparin and danaproid groups. In the heparin group, one patient had gastrointestinal bleeding, 5 developed wound haematomas, and one had leakage from the drain site for 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Danaproid sodium appeared more effective and safer than heparin, with no bleeding complications occurred.

Etiology of bloody diarrhea among patients presenting to United States emergency departments: prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enteropathogens.

Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) infections have been associated with bloody diarrhea. The prevalence of enteropathogens among patients with bloody diarrhea was determined by a prospective study at 11 US emergency departments. Eligible patients had bloody stools, > or =3 loose stool samples per 24-h period, and an illness lasting <7 days. Among 873 patients with 877 episodes of bloody diarrhea, stool samples for culture were obtained in 549 episodes (62.6%). Stool cultures were more frequently ordered for patients with fever, >10 stools/day, and visibly bloody stools than for patients without these findings. Enteropathogens were identified in 168 episodes (30.6%): Shigella (15.3%), Campylobacter (6.2%), Salmonella (5.8%), STEC (2.6%), and other (1.6%). Enteropathogens were isolated during 12.5% of episodes that physicians thought were due to a noninfectious cause. The prevalence of STEC infection varied by site from 0% to 6.2%. Hospital admissions resulted from 195 episodes (23.4%). These data support recommendations that stool samples be cultured for patients with acute bloody diarrhea.

Appropriateness of rabies postexposure prophylaxis treatment for animal exposures. Emergency ID Net Study Group.

CONTEXT: Rabies postexposure prophylaxis (RPEP) treatments and associated costs have increased in the United States. The extent to which RPEP use is consistent with guidelines is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To characterize animal contacts and determine the frequency and factors associated with inappropriate RPEP use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective case series study of patients presenting with an animal exposure-related complaint from July 1996 to September 1998 at 11 university-affiliated, urban emergency departments (the Emergency ID Net). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exposure type, circumstances, and RPEP use (appropriateness defined by local public health departments). RESULTS: Of 2030 exposures, 1635 (81%) were to dogs; 268 (13%) to cats; 88 (4%) to rodents/rabbits; 10 (0. 5%) to raccoons; 5 (0.2%) to bats; and 24 (1.2%) to other animals. Among those exposed, 136 (6.7%) received RPEP after dog (95), cat (21), raccoon (8), bat (4), or other animal (8) exposures. Use of RPEP varied by site (range, 0%-27.7% of exposures), with most frequent use reported at sites in the eastern United States. Management was considered appropriate in 1857 exposures (91.5%). Use of RPEP was considered inappropriate in 54 cases (40% of those in which it was given), owing to factors including animal availability for observation and exposure in a low-endemicity area. Rabies postexposure prophylaxis was considered inappropriately withheld from 119 cases (6.3% of those not receiving RPEP), often because a domestic animal was unavailable for observation or testing. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that use of RPEP is often inappropriate. Greater compliance with current guidelines would increase RPEP use. Physician education, improved coordination with public health officials, and clarification of RPEP guidelines could optimize use of this expensive resource. JAMA. 2000;284:1001-1007