Identifying ductal carcinoma in situ cases not requiring surgery to exclude postoperative upgrade to invasive ductal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Prospective cohort studies are being conducted worldwide to identify a low-grade group of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that does not require surgery. However, to do this, it is necessary to predict which cases, diagnosed with preoperative DCIS, will be upgraded to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) after surgery. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the frequency of IDC upgrades in patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with DCIS at Showa University using the criteria of ongoing clinical trials. We divided our cases into those that could be enrolled in the ongoing trial and those that could not. Moreover, we evaluated whether CNB, which is allowed only in Japanese clinical trials, is related to the IDC mixture. RESULTS: There were 211 (52.1%) cases that matched the criteria of the U.K. and Netherlands trials, of which 62 (29.4%) were upgraded to IDC. A total of 113 (27.9%) cases met the criteria for clinical trials in Japan and the U.S., 25 (22.1%) of which were upgraded to IDC and 47 (34.6%) which matched when considering biopsy methods. The number of cases upgraded to IDC decreased to four (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that there were a certain number of mixed IDC. We will pay attention to the results of ongoing clinical trials regarding how the presence of this mixed IDC affects the prognosis in non-surgery cases. Careful follow-up is recommended for non-surgical treatment.

Clinical benefit of treatment after trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world multi-centre cohort study in Japan (WJOG12519B).

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1-28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8-72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3-6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4-5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7-27.4). CONCLUSION: The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

Risk Factors for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in Triple-Negative or HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Who Achieve a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Attention has been focused on attempts to eliminate breast surgery for breast cancer patients who achieve a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, there are few data on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) among patients with triple-negative or epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) tumors who achieve a pathologic complete response after NAC and breast-conserving treatment. METHODS: Using a multi-institutional retrospective database, this study evaluated the risk factors for IBTR among patients with newly diagnosed stages 1 to 3 breast cancer involving triple-negative or HER2+ tumors who achieved ypT0 after NAC and breast-conserving treatment. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 4.8 years (range, 0.1-15.5 years), the 5-year IBTR-free survival rate was 95.5%. The breast cancer subtype was not associated with IBTR-free survival. Patients younger than 40 years at diagnosis had significantly worse IBTR-free survival than those who were 40 years of age or older (5-year IBTR-free survival, 87.7 vs 96.9%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrated that age at diagnosis was independently associated with IBTR-free survival. Special caution is needed when clinical trials analyzing omission of breast surgery after NAC are enrolling younger patients (UMIN-CTR No. UMIN000037067).

BRCAness as a prognostic indicator in patients with early breast cancer.

BRCAness is defined as a phenotypic copy of germline BRCA mutations, which describes presence of homologous recombination defects in sporadic cancers. We detected BRCAness by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and explored whether BRCAness can be used as a predictor of prognosis. BRCAness status was classified for total 121 breast cancer patients. Forty-eight patients (39.7%) were identified as BRCAness positive. Tumors of BRCAness were more likely to be hormone receptors negative (95.8% vs. 50.7%, P < 0.001), nuclear grade III (76.1% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.001) and triple-negative breast cancer subtype (91.6% vs. 42.5%, P < 0.001). Five-year disease free survival (DFS) (54.0% vs. 88.0%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (76.3% vs. 93.1%, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in BRCAness patients. In neoadjuvant chemotherapy subgroup analysis, clinical response rate for taxane-based regimen was significantly lower in BRCAness patients (58.3% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.041). Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that BRCAness was the independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 2.962, 95%CI 1.184-7.412, P = 0.020), but not for OS (HR 2.681, 95%CI 0.618-11.630, P = 0.188). BRCAness is associated with specific characteristics and may suggest resistance to taxane-based chemotherapy. BRCAness can be used as a negative prognostic indicator for breast cancer.

Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.

BACKGROUND: Breast density often affects cancer detection via mammography (MMG). Because of this, additional tests are recommended for women with dense breasts. This study aimed to reveal trends in breast density among Japanese women and determine whether differences in breast density differentially affected the detection of abnormalities via MMG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 397 control women who underwent MMG screening as well as 269 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer for whom preoperative MMG data were available. VolparaDensity™ (Volpara), a three-dimensional image analysis software with high reproducibility, was used to calculate breast density. Breasts were categorized according to the volumetric density grade (VDG), a measure of the percentage of dense tissue. The associations between age, VDG, and MMG density categories were analyzed. RESULTS: In the control group, 78% of women had dense breasts, while in the breast cancer group, 87% of patients had dense breasts. One of 36 patients with non-dense breasts (2.7%) was classified as category 1 or 2 (C-1 or C-2), indicating that abnormal findings could not be detected by MMG. The proportion of patients with breast cancer who had dense breasts and were classified as C-1 or C-2 was as high as 22.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of Japanese women with dense breasts were high. In addition, the false-negative rate for women with dense breasts was also high. Owing to this, Japanese women with dense breasts may need to commonly undergo additional tests to ensure detection of breast cancer in the screening MMG.