Correction: Nalin, D. Issues and Controversies in the Evolution of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT). Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 34.

In the original publication [...].

Eliminating Cholera Incidence and Mortality: Unfulfilled Tasks.

Impressive advances have been made in new cholera vaccine development and vaccination control strategies [...].

The History of Intravenous and Oral Rehydration and Maintenance Therapy of Cholera and Non-Cholera Dehydrating Diarrheas: A Deconstruction of Translational Medicine: From Bench to Bedside?

The "bench to bedside" (BTB) paradigm of translational medicine (TM) assumes that medical progress emanates from basic science discoveries transforming clinical therapeutic models. However, a recent report found that most published medical research is false due, among other factors, to small samples, inherent bias and inappropriate statistical applications. Translation-blocking factors include the validity (or lack thereof) of the underlying pathophysiological constructs and related therapeutic paradigms and adherence to faulty traditional beliefs. Empirical discoveries have also led to major therapeutic advances, but scientific dogma has retrospectively retranslated these into the BTB paradigm. A review of the history of intravenous (I.V.) and oral therapy for cholera and NDDs illustrates some fallacies of the BTB model and highlights pitfalls blocking translational and transformative progress, and retro-translational factors, including programmatic modifications of therapeutic advances contradicting therapeutic paradigms and medical economic factors promoting more expensive and profitable medical applications inaccessible to resource-limited environments.

Issues and Controversies in the Evolution of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT).

The original studies demonstrating the efficacy of oral glucose-electrolytes solutions in reducing or eliminating the need for intravenous therapy to correct dehydration caused by acute watery diarrheas (AWD) were focused chiefly on cholera patients. Later research adapted the oral therapy (ORT) methodology for treatment of non-cholera AWDs including for pediatric patients. These adaptations included the 2:1 regimen using 2 parts of the original WHO oral rehydration solution (ORS) formulation followed by 1 part additional plain water, and a "low sodium" packet formulation with similar average electrolyte and glucose concentrations when dissolved in the recommended volume of water. The programmatic desire for a single ORS packet formulation has led to controversy over use of the "low sodium" formulations to treat cholera patients. This is the subject of the current review, with the conclusion that use of the low-sodium ORS to treat cholera patients leads to negative sodium balance, leading to hyponatremia and, in severe cases, particularly in pediatric cholera, to seizures and other complications of sodium depletion. Therefore it is recommended that two separate ORS packet formulations be used, one for cholera therapy and the other for non-cholera pediatric AWD.

Cholera and Pancreatic Cholera: Is VIP the Common Pathophysiologic Factor?

BACKGROUND: Cholera remains a major global health problem, causing high output diarrhea leading to severe dehydration and shock in developing countries. We aimed to determine whether vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), the mediator of pancreatic cholera syndrome, has a role in the pathophysiology of human cholera. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of cholera cases hospitalized with severe dehydration. Plasma and stool water levels of VIP were measured just after admission, after complete rehydration (3-4 h), at 24 h post-rehydration and at discharge after diarrhea ceased. RESULTS: In total, 23 cholera patients were examined between January and August 2018. The geometric mean of stool VIP (sVIP) and plasma VIP (pVIP) on admission were 207.67 and 8.34 pmol/L, respectively. pVIP values were all within the normal range (

Ex vivo antigen-pulsed PBMCs generate potent and long lasting immunity to infection when administered as a vaccine.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that administration of antigen (Ag)-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) is an effective strategy for enhancing immunity to tumors and infectious disease organisms. However, the generation and/or isolation of DCs can require substantial time and expense. Therefore, using inactivated F. tularensis (iFt) Ag as a model immunogen, we first sought to determine if DCs could be replaced with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) during the ex-vivo pulse phase and still provide protection against Ft infection. Follow up studies were then conducted using the S. pneumoniae (Sp) vaccine Prevnar ®13 as the Ag in the pulse phase followed by immunization and Sp challenge. In both cases, we demonstrate that PBMCs can be used in place of DCs when pulsing with iFt and/or Prevnar ®13 ex vivo and re-administering the Ag-pulsed PBMCs as a vaccine. In addition, utilization of the i.n. route for Ag-pulsed PBMC administration is superior to use of the i.v. route in the case of Sp immunization, as well as when compared to direct injection of Prevnar ®13 vaccine i.m. or i.n. Furthermore, this PBMC-based vaccine strategy provides a more marked and enduring protective immune response and is also capable of serving as a multi-organism vaccine platform. The potential for this ex-vivo vaccine strategy to provide a simpler, less time consuming, and less expensive approach to DC-based vaccines and vaccination in general is also discussed.

Template protocol for clinical trials investigating vaccines--focus on safety elements.

This document is intended as a guide to the protocol development for trials of prophylactic vaccines. The template may serve phases I-IV clinical trials protocol development to include safety relevant information as required by the regulatory authorities and as deemed useful by the investigators. This document may also be helpful for future site strengthening efforts.

Safety and immunogenicity of early measles vaccination in children born to HIV-infected mothers in the United States: results of Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) protocol 225.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND.: ACTG (Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group) 225, a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial in the United States evaluated reactogenicity and immunogenicity of 2 vaccination regimens: monovalent measles vaccine (Attenuvax) at 6 months of age and measles, mumps, and rubella, live attenuated (MMRII) vaccine at 12 months of age (2D), or only MMRII at 12 months of age (1D) in human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV-infected) (POS) and uninfected (NEG) children in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (pre-HAART) period. METHODS: Plaque-reduction neutralization (PRN) of measles-neutralizing antibody titers were evaluated at study weeks 0, 6, 26, 32, 52, and 130 (∼3 years of age). RESULTS: The 110 subjects included: 65 2DNEG; 30 1DNEG; 7 2DPOS and 8 1DPOS. Vaccinations (n=175) were associated with no adverse experiences >Grade 2 except for Grade 3 fever (n=2, 1 1DPOS and 1 1DNEG). Six weeks after Attenuvax, all 2DPOS subjects (7/7) seroresponded (PRN titers ≥120 mIU/mL) with median titers significantly exceeding 2DNEG titers (2115 vs 628 mIU/mL, respectively; P=.023). At ∼3 years of age, 67% 1DPOS (4/6) and 83% 2DPOS (4/5) subjects maintained titers ≥120 mIU/mL. Prevaccination titers ≥25 mIU/mL among 2DNEG subjects correlated inversely with the likelihood of achieving titers ≥120 mIU/mL (56% vs 90%; P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Among HIV-infected children pre-HAART, Attenuvax at 6 months was well tolerated and immunogenic. These data support the current World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation to administer a first dose of measles vaccine at 6 months of age to HIV-infected children.