Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Toxicol ; 4(4): 289-91, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19031383

RESUMO

An extensive review of CDC epidemiological responses to human outbreaks of anthrax from occupational settings between the years of 1950 and 2001 documented a variety of approaches to mitigation and decontamination [2]. These approaches included taking no action, burning contaminated materials, chlorinating water supplies, instituting administrative and engineering controls and PPE, vaccinating potentially exposed individuals, and in 2 instances, fumigating with formaldehyde vapor (now considered to be a human carcinogen). Secondary contamination of a worker's home was documented in 1 case, but not felt to be clinically significant to warrant any decontamination efforts. In response to the B. anthracis attacks in 2001, chlorine dioxide fumigation, vaporous hydrogen peroxide fumigation, and a combination of HEPA vacuuming, cleaning, and bleach application were all techniques used successfully to clean B. anthracis spore contamination.


Assuntos
Antraz/microbiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Desinfetantes , Saúde Pública , Sistema de Registros , Animais , Antraz/epidemiologia , Antraz/prevenção & controle , Bacillus anthracis/química , Bovinos , Compostos Clorados , Connecticut , Descontaminação , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Recuperação e Remediação Ambiental , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Óxidos , Pesquisa , Esporos Bacterianos/química , Ultrafiltração , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA