Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 52(5): 343-347, 2024 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211770

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Female genital mutilation (FGM) covers all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external genitalia for non-therapeutic purposes. The period of pregnancy and childbirth is probably more at risk of complications for these women. The main aim of this study was to compare obstetrical, maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a history of female genital mutilation with patients without such a history. METHODS: All deliveries taking place between January 2005 and June 2022 at Besançon University Hospital in patients with a history of FGM were included. This group was compared with a randomly selected group of deliveries of patients with no history of FGM. A total of 87 deliveries with a history of FGM were included and compared with 696 deliveries with no history of FGM. RESULTS: There were significantly more instrumental deliveries (27.6% vs. 17.5%, P=0.01), more caesarean sections (23% vs. 14.1%, P=0.01), more episiotomies (9.2% vs. 0.7%, P<0.01), more first-degree perineal tears (30.8% vs. 20.8%, P=0.02), second-degree (13.9% vs. 5.3%, P<0, 01), third-degree (3.1% vs. 0.2%, P=0.02), more anterior perineal tears (23.1% vs. 2.5%, P<0.01), increased duration of pushing efforts (13 min vs. 10 min, P=0.05) and greater blood loss (297 cc vs. 165 cc, P<0.01) in the group with a history of FGM. There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: The obstetrical prognosis of patients with a history of FGM is significantly poorer. Neonatal prognosis remains unchanged.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Circuncisão Feminina , Parto Obstétrico , Períneo , Resultado da Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Circuncisão Feminina/efeitos adversos , Circuncisão Feminina/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Prognóstico , Períneo/lesões , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Extração Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Extração Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Lacerações/etiologia
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 50(11): 721-728, 2022 11.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055463

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Ectopic pregnancies are still the first mortality cause of the first semestre of pregnancy. They are much more frequent in IVF (2-5%) than in the standard population (1-2%). The aim of this study was to compare the rate of ectopic pregnancies following a fresh embryo transfer done whether at an clived embryo stage (day 2 or 3 of the embryo development) or at a blastocyst stage (day 5 or 6 of the embryo development). METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective study including all 18 to 43 year-old patients getting pregnant (ßHCG>100 UI/L) after a fresh embryo transfer from In Vitro Fecondation with or without Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection, between January 1st 2014 and December 30th 2020 in the Hospital of Besançon (France). This population has been divided into 2 groups according to the embryo stage on the day of transfer. RESULTS: Nine hundred and twenty two patients have been included. There were statistically more ectopic pregnancies after a blastocyst transfer (n=4; 5.4%) than after a clived embryo transfer (n=14; 1.7%). (P=0.049) CONCLUSION: In our population, there were more ectopic pregnancies from blastocyst(s) transfers than from clived embryo(es).


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Gravidez Ectópica , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sêmen , Gravidez Ectópica/epidemiologia , Transferência Embrionária , Taxa de Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...