Differentiation of parathyroid carcinoma and adenoma by preoperative ultrasonography.

Background Parathyroid carcinomas (PTC) are very rare. There have been a few studies on the contribution of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of PTC compared with parathyroid adenomas (PTA). Purpose To identify the differences between US findings of PTC and PTA in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Material and Methods We enrolled seven patients with PTC and 32 consecutive patients with PTA whose diagnoses were confirmed by surgery at our institution between March 1994 and June 2015. We retrospectively compared the US features of the two groups, as well as the demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics (age, gender, palpability, and serum ionized calcium and parathyroid hormone [PTH] levels). Results The patients with PTC and PTA did not exhibit significant differences in terms of mean age (59.0 years versus 51.1 years; P = 0.2063), sex distribution (male:female, 4:3 versus 1:3; P = 0.1716), mean PTH levels (2855.0 pg/mL versus 1821.5 pg/mL; P = 0.2067), and mean ionized calcium levels (1.7 mMol/L versus 1.5 mMol/L; P = 0.1585) except palpability ( P < 0.0001). On US images, the PTCs were significantly larger (3.5 cm versus 1.9 cm; P = 0.0133) and exhibited higher incidences of heterogeneous echotexture ( P = 0.0002), irregular shape ( P < 0.0001), non-circumscribed margin ( P < 0.0001), intra-nodular calcifications ( P = 0.014), and local invasion ( P = 0.0004) compared to the PTAs. Conclusion In preoperative patients with PHPT, PTCs are differentiated from PTAs by their palpability and significant US features: large size, heterogeneous echotexture, irregular shape, non-circumscribed margin, intra-nodular calcifications, and local invasion.

MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?

BACKGROUND: Morphologic and kinetic characteristics of breast lesions are regarded as a major criterion for their differential diagnosis in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, there have not been well-reported MRI findings of microinvasive ductal carcinoma. PURPOSE: To evaluate MRI characteristics of microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and to compare MRI findings in patients with microinvasive ductal carcinoma and pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients with pathologically confirmed microinvasive ductal carcinomas (n = 37) or pure DCIS (n = 44) were included in this study. The MRI findings were analyzed without knowledge of the pathologic and conventional imaging findings. For all the lesions detected on MRI, morphologic and kinetic analyses were performed according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. For the non-mass lesions, the presence of clustered ring enhancement was also analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test, χ(2) test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In total 35 cases of microinvasive ductal carcinoma and 39 cases of DCIS were detected on MRI. The most common and dominant MRI findings of microinvasive ductal carcinoma and DCIS were non-mass lesions with heterogeneous enhancement. However, the spiculated margin of the mass-type lesion (P = 0.022), the segmental distribution (P = 0.023), and clustered ring enhancement (P = 0.006) of the non-mass-type lesion, and the enhancement kinetics showing strong initial enhancement (P = 0.004) with subsequent wash-out (P = 0.001) were significantly more frequent in microinvasive ductal carcinoma than in DCIS. CONCLUSION: Non-mass lesions with segmental distribution, heterogeneous enhancement, and strong initial enhancement with a wash-out curve were the dominant MRI findings of microinvasive ductal carcinoma. Compared with DCIS, microinvasive ductal carcinoma showed more suspicious imaging characteristics. For the non-mass lesions, clustered ring enhancement was also a characteristic finding of microinvasion on MRI.

Analysis of the effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the outcome in women undergoing breast conservation surgery with radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain whether MRI identification of additional foci of disease leads to improved outcome. We undertook a study to evaluate the influence of breast MRI on early and long-term outcome. METHODS: Among 1,271 patients undergone breast cancer surgery between January 2005 and December 2006, 785 patients were attempted for BCS. Operative approach and radiologic findings were compared according to MRI use. We reselected 615 patients with unilateral early-stage breast cancer treated with BCS including RT. We compared the histopathologic characteristics and outcomes according to MRI use. RESULTS: In patients attempted for BCS (n = 785), re-excision rates were not significantly different according to MRI use (P = 1.000). Conversion to mastectomy or bilateral cancer surgery were higher in MRI group (P = 0.002). The IBTR rate was higher in the non-MRI group (P = 0.020). Difference in contralateral cancer rate and total recurrence rates failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.168, 0.383, respectively). Multivariate study after adjustment showed no difference in recurrence rates and IBTR rates between the two groups (hazard ratios 1.34, 6.37 Ps = 0.385, 0.076). CONCLUSION: Use of MRI in patients with early-stage breast cancer did not result in improvement of a patient's outcome.

Thyroid lymphoma: correlation of radiologic and pathologic features.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to correlate the clinicoradiologic and pathologic features of thyroid lymphoma and to identify the most useful diagnostic method for thyroid lymphoma as the first line. METHODS: Our study population included 16 patients with a diagnosis of thyroid lymphoma by fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, or surgery from 1995 to 2010. We retrospectively reviewed imaging and medical records. Sonographic findings were correlated with histopathologic results. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients, primary lymphomas were found in 13 and secondary in 3. The mean ages of the patients with primary and secondary lymphomas were 60.8 and 42.7 years, respectively. Most patients with primary lymphomas had symptoms of rapid neck swelling or a mass sensation. All primary lymphomas revealed non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, and secondary lymphomas included a B-cell origin in 2 and a T-cell origin in 1. On sonography, 10 (77%) of 13 primary lymphomas showed diffuse heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma with intervening echogenic septa-like structures, whereas all secondary lymphomas showed markedly hypoechoic nodules. Markedly hypoechoic parenchyma was correlated with lymphoepithelial lesions and neoplastic cells, whereas the intervening echogenic septa-like structures were consistent with fibrosis on pathologic examination. The exact diagnosis of thyroid lymphoma was possible with core biopsy in all 9 cases (100%) but with fine-needle aspiration in only 3 of 10 (30%), which included 7 under sonographic guidance and 3 under palpation (P = .0030). CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse hypoechoic parenchyma with intervening echogenic septa on sonography under the impression of a primary thyroid lymphoma, particularly in the setting of a rapidly enlarging mass, should prompt core biopsy rather than fine-needle aspiration.