Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 145, 2024 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858703

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is crucial for quality of care. Preventable adverse events (AEs) occur in 1 of 20 patients in the hospital, but it is unknown whether this is different for patients with a condition relevant for palliative care. The majority of the limited available research on this topic is only focused on patients already receiving palliative care, and do not make comparisons with other patients at the end-of-life. We identified and compared the prevalence, preventability, nature and causes of AEs in patients with and without a condition relevant for palliative care. METHODS: A nationwide retrospective record review study was performed in 20 Dutch hospitals. A total of 2,998 records of patients who died in hospital in 2019 was included. Records were reviewed for AEs. We identified two subgroups: patients with (n = 2,370) or without (n = 248) a condition relevant for palliative care through the selection method of Etkind (2017). Descriptive analyses were performed to calculate prevalence, nature, causes and prevention strategies. T-tests were performed to calculate differences between subgroups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between subgroups regarding AE prevalence, this was 15.3% in patients with a condition relevant for palliative care, versus 12.0% in patients without a condition relevant for palliative care (p = 0.148). Potentially preventable AE prevalence was 4.3% versus 4.4% (p = 0.975). Potentially preventable death prevalence in both groups was 3.2% (p = 0.938). There were differences in the nature of AEs: in patients with a condition relevant for palliative care this was mostly related to medication (33.1%), and in patients without a condition relevant for palliative care to surgery (50.8%). In both subgroups in the majority of AEs a patient related cause was identified. For the potentially preventable AEs in both subgroups the two most important prevention strategies as suggested by the medical reviewers were reflection and evaluation and quality assurance. DISCUSSION: Patient safety risks appeared to be equally prevalent in both subgroups. The nature of AEs does differ between subgroups: medication- versus surgery-related, indicating that tailored safety measures are needed. Recommendations for practice are to focus on reflecting on AEs, complemented with case evaluations.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Assistência Terminal/normas , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Sleep Med Rev ; 76: 101951, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754209

RESUMO

Polysomnography (PSG) is the reference standard of sleep measurement, but is burdensome for the participant and labor intensive. Affordable electroencephalography (EEG)-based wearables are easy to use and are gaining popularity, yet selecting the most suitable device is a challenge for clinicians and researchers. In this systematic review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of available EEG-based wearables to measure human sleep. For each wearable, an overview will be provided regarding validated population and reported measurement properties. A systematic search was conducted in the databases OVID MEDLINE, Embase.com and CINAHL. A machine learning algorithm (ASReview) was utilized to screen titles and abstracts for eligibility. In total, 60 papers were selected, covering 34 unique EEG-based wearables. Feasibility studies indicated good tolerance, high compliance, and success rates. The 42 included validation studies were conducted across diverse populations and showed consistently high accuracy in sleep staging detection. Therefore, the recent advancements in EEG-based wearables show great promise as alternative for PSG and for at-home sleep monitoring. Users should consider factors like user-friendliness, comfort, and costs, as these devices vary in features and pricing, impacting their suitability for individual needs.

3.
Eur J Intern Med ; 112: 86-92, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002150

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Older adults at the Emergency Department (ED) often present with nonspecific complaints (NSC) such as 'weakness' or 'feeling unwell'. Health care workers may underestimate illness in patients with NSC, leading to adverse health outcomes. This study compares characteristics and outcomes of NSC-patients versus specific complaints (SC) patients. METHODS: Cohort study in patients ≥ 70 years in two Dutch EDs. NSC was classified according to the BANC-study-framework based on the medical history in the ED letter, before additional diagnostics took place. A second classification was performed at the end of the ED visit/hospital admission. Primary outcomes were functional decline, institutionalization, and mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: 26% (n = 228) of a total of 888 included patients presented with NSC. Compared with SC-patients, NSC-patients were older, more frail, and more frequently female. NSC-patients had a higher risk of functional decline and institutionalization at 30 days (adjusted ORs 1.84, 95% CI 1.27 - 2.72, and 2.46, 95% CI 1.51-4.00, respectively), but not mortality (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.58 - 2.73). Reclassification to a specific complaint after the ED visit or hospital admission occurred in 54% of NSC-patients. CONCLUSION: NSC occur especially in older, frail female patients and are associated with an increased risk of functional decline and institutionalization, even after adjustment for worse baseline status. In half of the patients, a specific complaint revealed during ED or hospital stay. Physicians at the ED should consider NSC as a red flag needing appropriate observation and evaluation of underlying serious conditions and needs of this vulnerable patient group.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Tempo de Internação , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
4.
J Ultrasound ; 26(1): 163-168, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35567703

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk for venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism. The exact prevalence of asymptomatic DVT is not known, as is the usefulness of screening for DVT in patients admitted to ward with COVID-19. We have studied the prevalence of asymptomatic DVT. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational multi-center study at four university medical centers in The Netherlands. All adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to a medical ward were eligible for inclusion, including patients who were transferred back from the ICU to the ward. The study protocol consisted of weekly cross-sectional rounds of compression ultrasound. RESULTS: In total, 125 patients were included in the study. A significant proportion of patients (N = 34 (27%)) had developed a VTE during their admission for COVID-19 before the study ultrasound was performed. In most VTE cases (N = 27 (79%)) this concerned pulmonary embolism. A new asymptomatic DVT was found in 5 of 125 patients (4.0%; 95% CI 1.3-9.1%) (Table 2). Nine patients (7.2%; 95% CI 3.3-13.2%) developed a VTE (all PE) diagnosed within 28 days after the screening US was performed. CONCLUSION: We have shown a low prevalence (4%) of newly discovered asymptomatic DVT outside the ICU-setting in COVID-19 patients. Despite this low prevalence, nine patients developed PE (7%) within 28 days after ultrasound. This favors the hypothesis of local thrombus formation in the lungs. Based on our findings and literature, we do not recommend US-screening of asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ward.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 10(6): e4373, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35702355

RESUMO

It has been suggested that compounds present in silicone breast implants (eg, silicone particles or heavy metals such as platinum) migrate into the body and can cause systemic symptoms in susceptible women, causing what is known as breast implant illness. This pilot study investigates possible associations between hair platinum levels in patients with breast implants and breast implant illness, and evaluates its possible use for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Patients were included from the silicone outpatient clinic at Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Platinum concentration in hair samples of 10 women with breast implants and systemic symptoms (group A) was compared with that in 10 women with breast implants but no symptoms (group B), and a control group of 10 women without implants or symptoms (group C), using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Radiological imaging was used to assess implant ruptures or silicone leakage. Results: A median platinum concentration of 0.09 µg per kg [IQR 0.04-0.15] was found in group A, 0.08 µg per kg [IQR 0.04-0.12] in group B, and 0.04 µg per kg [IQR 0.02-0.13] in group C, with no statistical significant difference between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.43). No correlation between radiologically proven implant leakage and platinum level was found. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in hair platinum levels in women with or without silicone breast implants or breast implant illness. Therefore, based on this pilot study, we do not recommend this test for clinical use. Given the small sample size, more research is required to fully assess its possible use for diagnostic purposes.

6.
J Crit Care ; 69: 153992, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35104693

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Critically ill COVID-19 patients have an increased risk of developing pulmonary embolism (PE). Diagnosis of PE by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) might reduce the need for computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), while decreasing time-to-diagnosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: This prospective, observational study included adult ICU patients with COVID-19. Multi-organ (lungs, deep vein, cardiac) POCUS was performed within 24 h of CTPA, looking for subpleural consolidations, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and right ventricular strain (RVS). We reported the scan time, and calculated diagnostic accuracy measures for these signs separately and in combination. RESULTS: 70 consecutive patients were included. 23 patients (32.8%) had a PE. Median scan time was 14 min (IQR 11-17). Subpleural consolidations' diagnostic accuracy was: 42.9% (95%CI [34.1-52.0]). DVT's and RVS' diagnostic accuracy was: 75.6% (95%CI [67.1-82.9]) and 74.4% (95%CI [65.8-81.8]). Their sensitivity was: 24.0% (95%CI [9.4-45.1]), and 40.0% (95%CI [21.3-61.3]), while their specificity was: 88.8% (95%CI [80.8-94.3]), and: 83.0% (95%CI [74.2-89.8]), respectively. Multi-organ POCUS sensitivity was: 87.5% (95%CI [67.6-97.3]), and specificity was: 25% (95%CI [16.9-34.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-organ rather than single-organ POCUS can be of aid in ruling out PE in critically ill COVID-19 and help select patients for CTPA. In addition, finding RVS can make PE more likely, while a DVT would preclude the need for a CTPA. REGISTRATION: www.trialregister.nl: NL8540.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Trombose Venosa , Adulto , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Estado Terminal , Humanos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estudos Prospectivos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem
8.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 9(7): 3209-3219, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33102272

RESUMO

Innovative solutions are required to effectively address the unprecedented surge of demand on our healthcare systems created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Home treatment and monitoring of patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic can be readily implemented to ameliorate the health system burden while maintaining safety and effectiveness of care. Such endeavor requires careful triage and coordination, telemedicine and technology support, workforce and education, as well as robust infrastructure. In the understandable paucity of evidence-based, protocolized approaches toward HOT for COVID-19 patients, our group has created the current document based on the cumulative experience of members of the Joint ACAIM-WACEM COVID-19 Clinical Management Taskforce. Utilizing available evidence-based resources and extensive front-line experience, the authors have suggested a pragmatic pathway for providing safe and effective home oxygen therapy in the community setting.

9.
Neth J Med ; 78(5): 251-260, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33093250

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Organisation of the emergency department (ED) is gaining attention due to an increased demand on emergency services, leading to crowding and influencing the quality of care. It is known that the organisation of acute care influences the performance of the ED. In the Netherlands, the organisation of EDs differs between hospitals. However, detailed information about the various organisational structures is lacking. This study aims to determine the organisational structures and the different roles and responsibilities of internists and emergency physicians (EPs) in the EDs. METHODS: We performed a nationwide observational study between January 2018 and February 2019. All hospitals with an ED in the Netherlands were identified, contacted, and surveyed. Requested information was retrieved from internists and complemented with local administrative hospital data. RESULTS: 76 out of 89 EDs responded to the questionnaire (84%); 93% of EDs were operational 24/7. A registered acute internist was present at 47 locations (62%) and an EP at 60 EDs (79%). At 10 locations (13.2%), internists reported not being physically present at the ED. Supervision and working agreements between EPs and internists differed between the hospitals. Collaboration between EPs and internists was graded satisfactory (7.4/10). CONCLUSION: This is the first study providing a detailed overview of the ED organisation in the Netherlands regarding internal medicine patients. This organisation differs in terms of staffing, presence of EPs and internists, and working agreements. The influence of the various organisational structures of EDs on quality of acute care should be the subject of future research.


Assuntos
Aglomeração , Medicina de Emergência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Médicos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Países Baixos
12.
Neth J Med ; 78(1): 3-9, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043473

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis in patients with cancer is increasingly common and associated with high mortality. To date, no studies have examined the effectiveness of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer. This study aimed without and to evaluate the effect of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc sub-analysis of the PHANTASi (PreHospital ANTibioitcs Against Sepsis) trial database: a randomised controlled trial which enrolled patients with suspected sepsis who were transported to the emergency department by ambulance. Patients in the intervention group were administered prehospital intravenous antibiotics while those in the control group received usual care. We compared patients who had cancer to those who did not. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; among the secondary outcomes, we included in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: 357(13.4%) of the 2658 included patients had cancer in the past five years, of which, 209 (58.5%) were included in the intervention and 148 (41.5%) usual care groups; 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who were diagnosed with cancer in the past five years than those without cancer in the past five years: 15.2% vs. 7.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prehospital antibiotics in the group of patients with cancer in the last five years yielded no significant effect on survival. There were however, significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (p = 0.031) in the intervention group of cancer patients (12.2% vs 5.7%). CONCLUSION: Prehospital antibiotics did not improve overall survival. However, there was a significant reduction in 30-day readmissions.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Sepse/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sobrevida
13.
Neth J Med ; 77(9): 330-337, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31814587

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older people increasingly demand emergency department (ED) care. ED visits have a profound impact on older patients, including high risk of adverse outcomes and loss of independency. In this study, we evaluated the opinions of patients, caregivers, general practitioners, and ED physicians on the preventability of ED visits. METHODS: Prospective, mixed-method observational and qualitative study of 200 patients aged ≥ 70 years visiting a teaching hospital ED in the Netherlands. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients, caregivers, and general practitioners. ED physicians were provided with written surveys. Patient data were extracted to determine vulnerability. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 79.6 years; 49.5% were male. Ninety-five percent lived independently before the ED visit. Most patients reported domiciliary care (23%), a caregiver (21.5%), or both (29.5%). Patients considered 12.2% of visits potentially preventable, caregivers 9%, general practitioners 20.7%, and ED physicians 31.2%. Consensus on preventability was poor, especially among patients and professionals. While patients most frequently blamed themselves, healthcare providers predominantly mentioned lack of communication and organisational issues as contributing factors. CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers consider an ED visit preventable less frequently than professionals do. Little consensus was found among patients and healthcare providers, and the perspectives on contributing factors to a preventable visit differ between groups. To help improve geriatric emergency care, future studies should focus on why these perspectives are so different and aim to align them.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Cuidadores/psicologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pacientes/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Países Baixos , Prevenção Primária
14.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0222450, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31574094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to the rise in incidence, the long term effect of sepsis are becoming more evident. There is increasing evidence that sepsis may result in an impaired health related quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate whether health related quality of life is impaired in sepsis survivors and which clinical parameters are associated with the affected health related quality of life. METHODS: We analyzed 880 Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires that were sent to sepsis survivors who participated in the Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial. These questionnaires were sent by email, 28 days after discharge. Data entry and statistical analyses were performed in SPSS. The data from the general Dutch population, was obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL) and served as a control group. Subsequently, 567 sepsis survivors were matched to 567 controls. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare these two groups. Within the group, we sought to explain the diminished health related quality of life by factor analysis. RESULTS: We found that sepsis survivors have a worse health related quality of life compared to the general Dutch population. This negative effect was more evident for the physical component than the mental component of health related quality of life. We found that health related quality of life was significantly altered by advancing age and female sex. We also found that the total length of stay (in the hospital) and (previous) comorbidity negatively affect the physical component of health related quality of life. CONCLUSION: In our study we found that health related quality of life in sepsis survivors, 28 days after discharge, is severely diminished in comparison with the general Dutch population. The physical domain is severely affected, whereas the mental domain is less influenced. The length of stay, comorbidity, advancing age and female sex all have a negative effect on the Physical Component Scale of the health related quality of life.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Idoso , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Comorbidade , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/patologia , Sepse/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
15.
Comput Biol Med ; 115: 103488, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31634699

RESUMO

Many studies have been published on a variety of clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) for sepsis, while there is no overview of the literature. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the literature and thereby identify knowledge gaps and prioritize areas with high priority for further research. A literature search was conducted in PubMed from inception to February 2019. Search terms related to AI were combined with terms regarding sepsis. Articles were included when they reported an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) as outcome measure. Fifteen articles on diagnosis of sepsis with AI models were included. The best performing model reached an AUROC of 0.97. There were also seven articles on prognosis, predicting mortality over time with an AUROC of up to 0.895. Finally, there were three articles on assistance of treatment of sepsis, where the use of AI was associated with the lowest mortality rates. Of the articles, twenty-two were judged to be at high risk of bias or had major concerns regarding applicability. This was mostly because predictor variables in these models, such as blood pressure, were also part of the definition of sepsis, which led to overestimation of the performance. We conclude that AI models have great potential for improving early identification of patients who may benefit from administration of antibiotics. Current AI prediction models to diagnose sepsis are at major risks of bias when the diagnosis criteria are part of the predictor variables in the model. Furthermore, generalizability of these models is poor due to overfitting and a lack of standardized protocols for the construction and validation of the models. Until these problems have been resolved, a large gap remains between the creation of an AI algorithm and its implementation in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Aprendizado de Máquina , Modelos Biológicos , Sepse , Humanos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico
17.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0214052, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30897186

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures remain the gold standard for detecting bacteremia despite their limitations. The current practice of blood culture collection is still inefficient with low yields. Limited focus has been given to the association between timing of specimen collection at different time points during admission and their yield. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study by analyzing all 3,890 sets of cultures collected from the 1,962 admitted patients over the seven-month period of this study. We compared the blood culture yield between the early group (≤24 hours after admission) and the late group (> 24 hours of admission). We also investigated the effect of prehospital oral antibiotics and pre-analytical time on the first cultures in the emergency department. Epidemiology and efficiency of blood cultures were studied for each medical specialty. RESULTS: In total, 3,349(86.1%) blood cultures were negative and 541(13.9%) were positive for one or more microorganisms. After correcting for contamination, the overall yield was 290 (7.5%). The early group (n = 1,490) yielded significantly more true-positive cultures (10.1% versus 5.8%, P<0.001) than the late group (n = 2,400). The emergency department had a significantly higher yield than general wards, 11.2% versus 5.7% (p<0.001). Prehospital oral antibiotic use and pre-analytical time did not affect the yield of first cultures at the emergency department (p = 0.735 and 0.816 respectively). The number of tests needed to obtain one true-positive culture varied between departments, ranging from 7 to 45. CONCLUSION: This study showed that blood cultures are inefficient in detecting bacteremia. Cultures collected during 24 hours after admission yielded more positive results than those collected later. Significant variations in blood culture epidemiology and efficiency per specialty suggest that guidelines should be reevaluated. Future studies should aim at improving blood culture yield, implementing educational programs to reduce contamination and cost-effective application of modern molecular diagnostic technologies.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Hemocultura/normas , Hemocultura/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Quartos de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Manejo de Espécimes , Fatores de Tempo
18.
Med Teach ; 41(6): 714-715, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944031

RESUMO

We are in the midst of transformation of health systems where remote consulting (via video, telephone, email, and mobile messaging) is soon to become the dominant mode of consultation. Most of the literature on telehealth omits mentioning the need for telehealth communication competencies. Yet evidence base has been growing about how critical this training is - whether from clinical communication research or litigation claims analysis. In this article, we are calling for an urgent expansion of communication skills curricula to encompass these new telehealth domains from medical schools, specialty trainings to CMEs.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Currículo , Educação Médica/normas , Humanos , Telemedicina/normas
19.
Acute Med ; 17(2): 77-82, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882557

RESUMO

Readmissions are treated as adverse events in many healthcare systems. Causes can be physiological deterioration or breakdown of social support systems. We investigated data from a European multi-centre study of readmissions for changes in vital signs between index admission and readmission. Data sets were graded according to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Of 487 patients in whom NEWS could be calculated on discharge and again on re-admission, 39.6% had worse vital signs with a NEWS score difference ≥ 2 points while only 7.6% had improved by ≤ 2 points. Changes in individual vital signs of 20% or more were most common in respiratory rate and heart rate. Monitoring of respiratory rate and pulse rate post-discharge might predict some deteriorations.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Alta do Paciente/normas , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Sinais Vitais , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
20.
Neth J Med ; 76(2): 72-77, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29515004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study investigates (1) whether the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) model underestimates or overestimates disease severity and (2) the completeness of the data collected by administrators to calculate HSMR in a cohort of deceased patients with the diagnosis of pneumonia. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and Abbreviated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (abbMEDS) scores and associated mortality probabilities were obtained from 32 deceased pneumonia patients over the year 2014 in the VU University Medical Centre. These were compared with mortality probabilities of the Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS) calculated for every patient using the HSMR model. Clinical charts were examined to extract relevant comorbidities to determine the reliability of data sent to the national registration of hospital care. RESULTS: Risk categories determined by using the PSI and the abbMEDS were significantly higher compared with the risk categories according to HSMR (p = 0.001, respectively p = 0.000). The mean difference between the number of comorbidities in our registration and the coders' registration was 1.97 (p = 0.00). The mean difference was 0.97 (p = 0.000) for the number of comorbidities of influence on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and 1.25 (p = 0.001) for the calculated CCI. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the mortality probabilities as calculated by the CBS are an underestimation of the risk of dying for each patient. Our study also showed that the registration of data sent to the CBS underestimated the actual comorbidities of the patient, and could possibly influence the HSMR.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Modelos Estatísticos , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Comorbidade , Confiabilidade dos Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Probabilidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...