Patterns of Response and Progression to Immunotherapy.

Patterns of response and progression to immunotherapy may differ from those observed with drugs such as chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. Specifically, some patients experience a response after progression that is retrospectively named pseudoprogression. This phenomenon of pseudoprogression, first reported in patients with melanoma who were treated with ipilimumab, has led to the development of immune-specific related response criteria, such as irRC (immune-related response criteria), irRECIST (immune-related RECIST), and iRECIST (immunotherapy RECIST) that allow continued treatment beyond progression. However, the rate of pseudoprogression has never exceeded 10% of patients across tumor types. Conversely, rapid progressions after immunotherapy, called hyperprogressions, were reported by three different teams in 9% to 29% of patients treated with immunotherapy. Because of the absence of control arms in these studies, it remains to be determined whether these rapid progressions reflect a detrimental effect of immunotherapy in these patients. Finally, preliminary data suggest that immunotherapy might also affect response to subsequent standard therapies. In total, given the rarity of pseudoprogressions across tumor types and the recent description of hyperprogressions, classic RECIST remains a reasonable and rational method to assess response to immunotherapy. Continuation of treatment beyond progression should be proposed only in carefully selected patients whose clinical conditions have improved and who have not experienced severe toxicities. Although there is an urgent need to identify predictive biomarkers of efficacy to immunotherapy, there is an equally urgent need to identify predictive factors of progression or possibly hyperprogression.

Ibrutinib-induced severe liver injury.

Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase of the B-cell receptor pathway, is an effective therapeutic agent for B-cell lymphomas. As these drugs are novel, long-term or rare adverse events are not yet known. We report the first case of ibrutinib-induced severe liver injury in a patient with relapsed/refractory CLL.

Immunotherapeutic Approaches to Biliary Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare aggressive neoplasms with a poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 1 year in the locally advanced or metastatic setting. Among the few patients who undergo curative resection the recurrence rates are high. About 90% of patients are detected at advanced stages, and systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of their treatment. The treatment options for these patients are limited and multiple modalities of therapy from targeted therapy to immunotherapy and combination therapies (immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy) have been tested in this disease. Targeted therapies have failed to show a survival benefit. The deregulation of the immune system plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of BTCs. Therefore, immunotherapy, especially, immune checkpoint inhibitors hold great promise for this group of cancers. Numerous trials of immunotherapy in BTC are currently ongoing. In this review, we will discuss the available data and evidence for immunotherapy in BTC.

Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Impact of Biologic Agents in Ethnic Minorities With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents have improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the clinical trials included a predominately white population (85%), with Hispanic and black patients underrepresented. Thus, the real world benefit for the latter remains unknown. Comparative effectiveness research is a tool allowing for this exploration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated for mCRC from 2000 to 2011 were extracted from the medical records of Montefiore Medical Center. A semiparametric accelerated failure time model was used to assess the survival differences between patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) alone versus CT plus biologic agents (CBT). RESULTS: Of the 290 patients (black, 45.9%; Hispanic, 26.2%; and white, 27.9%), 53.8% received biologic agents. The median overall survival was 15.2 months in the CT-alone group and 25.6 months in CBT group (P = .004). On univariate analysis, a lower number of metastatic sites, carcinoembryonic antigen < 41 ng/mL, and more lines of CT were associated with improved overall survival. In a propensity score-based analysis of the entire cohort, CBT offered a survival benefit compared with CT alone (increased median survival, 1.44-fold; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.86; P = .038). The results of the subgroup analysis suggested a survival benefit for white patients (2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.23; P = .031) but not for Hispanic (1.42; 95% CI, 0.91-2.20; P = .370) or black (1.12; 95% CI, 0.76-1.66; P = .596) patients. CONCLUSION: In the present cohort, CBT was associated with longer survival, with the effect mainly driven by the outcomes for white patients, with black patients not appearing to benefit. These data are provocative and warrant further confirmation. Efforts to increase ethnic minority patients' enrollment in clinical trials is required to prospectively define the benefit from novel therapies.

Breast cancer in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome - a case-series study and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare disease with autosomal dominant inheritance linked to germline mutations of tumor suppressor gene TP53. These patients are predisposed to malignancies such as sarcoma, breast cancer, leukemia, and other malignancies. Breast cancer, the most common malignancy in adult patients with LFS, has an early-onset presentation and is usually treated as per the guidelines for the general population due to the limited literature about breast cancer in LFS. We aimed to describe our institutional experience treating patients with breast cancer and LFS to contribute to literature about this entity. DESIGN: Retrospective single-institution case-series study. We searched for cases with LFS and breast cancer from 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2015 with treatment received at our institution. RESULTS: We identified 4 cases (2 African Americans, 1 Indian, and 1 Hispanic) in 4 different families, who were diagnosed with LFS after presenting with breast cancer. Three cases were triple-negative disease and 1 case was ER+, HER2 positive disease. They were treated with mastectomy and a third-generation breast chemotherapy regimen and/or trastuzumab-containing regimen. Radiation therapy was used in 2 patients. Breast cancer recurrence was seen in 1 patient, while three other malignancies were identified after breast cancer treatment (1 breast sarcoma, 1 leiomyosarcoma, and 1 myelodysplastic syndrome). A patient, who underwent surveillance with a positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan, was found to have a stage I leiomyosarcoma and was treated with surgical resection, but then developed metastatic disease requiring cytotoxic chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer among patients with LFS needs a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Surgical management follows the guidelines for the general population. Risk-benefit assessment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy needs to be performed carefully in a case-by-case approach. Patients should undergo multimodality cancer surveillance, preferably in the context of a clinical trial.

Targeting angiogenesis in gastrointestinal tumors: current challenges.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the few cancers where screening modalities are standardized, but it still remains the third leading cause of cancer related mortality. For more than a decade now, the approval of anti-angiogenic therapy has led to an increase in the rate of overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced colon cancer. The drawback of the anti-angiogenic therapy is that their effect is short-lived and many patients progress through these therapies. Various mechanisms of resistance have been hypothesized, but overcoming this has been challenging. Also, there are no standardized predictive biomarkers that could aid in selecting patients who responds to the therapy upfront. This review focuses on the basis of angiogenesis, describing the approved anti-angiogenic therapies, discusses the challenges in terms of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy and also the role of biomarkers. In the future, hopefully newer targeted therapies, immunotherapy, combination therapies and the standardization of biomarkers may result in improved outcomes and cure rates.