Atrial Fibrillation in Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.

This report highlights the importance of recognizing, managing, and predicting the risk of ventricular fibrillation in patients presenting with pre-excited atrial fibrillation. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

Cardiac Image Registration: Rotational Error Correction and Gated Stabilization for Cardiac Motion.

Background: Dynamic motion of the heart due to cardiac and respiratory cycles, and rotation from varying patient positions between imaging modalities, can cause errors during cardiac image registration. This study used phantom, patient and animal models to assess and correct these errors. Methods and Results: Rotational errors were identified and corrected using different phantom orientations. ECG-gated fluoro images were aligned with similarly gated CT images in 9 patients, and accuracy assessed during atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus rhythm. A tracking algorithm corrected errors due to respiration; 4 independent observers compared 25 respiration sequences to an automated method. Following correction of these errors, target registration error was assessed. At 20 mm and 30 mm from the phantom model's center point with an in-plane rotation of 8 degrees, measured error was 2.94 mm and 5.60 mm, respectively, and the main error identified. A priori method accurately predicted ECG location in only 38% (p=0.0003) of 313 R-R intervals in AF. A posteriori method accurately gated the ECG during AF and sinus rhythm in 97% and 98% of 375 beats evaluated, respectively (p=NS). Tracking algorithm for ECG-gated motion compensation was identified as good or fair 96% of the time, with no difference between observers and automated method (chi-square=25; p=NS). Target registration error in phantom and animal models was 1.75±1.03 mm and 0 to 0.5 mm, respectively. Conclusions: Errors during cardiac image registration can be identified and corrected. Cardiac image stabilization can be achieved using ECG gating and respiration.

Periprocedural anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can increase risk of left atrial (LA) thrombi and stroke. Optimal periprocedural anticoagulation has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: We report the role of administering warfarin and aspirin without low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS: A total of 207 patients underwent ablation for AF. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided transseptal puncture and ruled out clot in the LA. After first puncture, the sheath was flushed with heparin (5,000 Units/mL). After second puncture, a bolus of 80 units/kg of heparin was given, followed by an infusion to maintain activated clotting time (ACT) around 300-350 seconds. Warfarin was stopped and aspirin was started (325 mg/day) 3 days preprocedure. Warfarin was restarted on the day of the procedure. Both medications were continued for 6 weeks postablation. Warfarin was continued for 6 months in patients with prior history of persistent or recurrent AF. Thirty-seven patients who showed smoke in the LA on TEE were given low molecular weight heparin postprocedure until international normalized ratio (INR) was therapeutic. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had persistent and 175 had paroxysmal AF; 87 were cardioverted during ablation. Two patients had transient ischemic attack (TIA) on the sixth and eighth days, respectively, following ablation, with complete recovery. Both had subtherapeutic INRs. CONCLUSION: In patients without demonstrable clot or smoke in the LA, starting aspirin 3 days prior and warfarin immediately post-radiofrequency ablation, without low molecular weight heparin, with meticulous anticoagulation during the procedure, appears to be a safe mode of anticoagulation.

Biventricular pacing and QT interval prolongation.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine BiV pacing-dependent changes in QT interval and the related potential for proarrhythmia. Biventricular (BiV) pacing has emerged as a promising therapy for patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF) and bundle branch block (BBB). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients (123 men and 53 women; mean age 67 +/- 16 years) with ischemic (n = 128) or nonischemic (n = 48) cardiomyopathy in New York Heart Association Class II (8%) or III (92%) CHF (ejection fraction 24 +/- 9%) underwent atrial synchronous BiV pacing. The QRS, QT, and JT intervals were measured at 30 minutes after initiation of BiV pacing, at 24 hours, and at 1 month postimplant. QT interval was defined as the time interval between the initial deflection of the QRS complex and the point at which the T wave crossed the isoelectric line. At baseline, the average QRS duration was 178 +/- 10 ms, attributable to left BBB (n = 158) or intraventricular conduction delay (n = 18). BiV pacing resulted in a small but statistically significant reduction in QRS duration (148 +/- 9 ms during BiV pacing vs 178 +/- 10 ms at baseline [P < 0.0001]), yet the QT increased to 470 +/- 34 ms with BiV pacing versus 445 +/- 32 ms at baseline [P < 0.0001]). The JTc interval during BiV pacing was significantly shorter than during LV pacing (290 +/- 9 ms vs 320 +/- 20 ms, P < 0.0001). During a mean follow-up of 24 +/- 6 months, one patient developed recurrent torsade de pointes. That was eliminated once left ventricular pacing was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Biventricular pacing prolongs QT interval. However, the occurrence of torsade de pointes is uncommon.

Computed tomography-fluoroscopy image integration-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the feasibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using registered three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images of the left atrium with fluoroscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with symptomatic AF refractory to medical therapy (32 paroxysmal, 18 persistent, age 55 +/- 10 years) were randomized to undergo a catheter-based AF ablation procedure with or without the CT-fluoroscopy guidance system. All patients underwent preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT imaging and segmentation of the left atrium. For the CT-fluoroscopy group, circumferential lesions encompassing the pulmonary vein (PV) antrum and linear lesions along the roof of the left atrium between the superior PVs and the mitral isthmus were created on the CT image, which was registered with real-time fluoroscopy. The registered images were then used to navigate the ablation catheters to the sites of planned ablation. After the ablation sites were completed, any remaining PV potentials were isolated with electrophysiological guidance. In the control patients, the same technique was performed without using the CT-fluoro guidance system. CT scans were accurately registered to fluoroscopic images with minimal manual correction. Operators could navigate catheters on the registered images to preplanned, extraostial sites for ablation. CT-fluoroscopy guidance decreased procedure duration and fluoro times (P < 0.05). At a mean follow-up of 9 +/- 2 months, 21 patients (84%) in the CT-fluoro guidance group and 16 patients (64%) in the control group have had no recurrence of AF. CONCLUSION: CT-fluoroscopic-guided left atrial ablation is feasible and allows appropriate catheter manipulation in the left atrium.

Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Various strategies have been used for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. It is unclear whether adding linear lesions to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has significant advantages. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the clinical benefit of adding linear lesions in patients undergoing PV isolation for AF. METHODS: One hundred patients (63 male and 37 female; mean age of 59 +/- 11 years) with documented paroxysmal AF were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent PV isolation alone. The second group underwent PV isolation and had two linear lesions created; one line between the superior PVs, and a second line from the left inferior PV to the mitral valve annulus. Patients' clinical progress after the ablation was evaluated and compared at 1, 3, and 9 months after their respective ablation procedures. RESULTS: The linear lesions group maintained sinus rhythm and had fewer symptoms than the lone PV isolation group (86 vs. 58%, respectively) (p < 0.05) at 1 month. At 9 months, when patients who reverted to AF underwent additional management to regain sinus rhythm (90 vs. 82%, respectively) (p = NS), there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the use of antiarrhythmics, the need for electrical cardioversion, and subjective improvement. CONCLUSION: The addition of linear lesions to PV isolation more effectively achieved sinus rhythm initially and fewer patients required additional management to maintain their rhythm when compared to patients who underwent lone PV isolation. However, at 9 months, the overall results were similar in both groups.