EFFECTS OF M101-AN EXTRACELLULAR HEMOGLOBIN-APPLIED DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: AN EXPERIMENTAL RODENT STUDY.

ABSTRACT: During and immediately after cardiac arrest, cerebral oxygen delivery is impaired mainly by microthrombi and cerebral vasoconstriction. This may narrow capillaries so much that it might impede the flow of red blood cells and thus oxygen transport. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the effect of M101, an extracellular hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (Hemarina SA, Morlaix, France) derived from Arenicola marina , applied during cardiac arrest in a rodent model, on markers of brain inflammation, brain damage, and regional cerebral oxygen saturation. Twenty-seven Wistar rats subjected to 6 min of asystolic cardiac arrest were infused M101 (300 mg/kg) or placebo (NaCl 0.9%) concomitantly with start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Brain oxygenation and five biomarkers of inflammation and brain damage (from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and homogenates from four brain regions) were measured 8 h after return of spontaneous circulation. In these 21 different measurements, M101-treated animals were not significantly different from controls except for phospho-tau only in single cerebellum regions ( P = 0.048; ANOVA of all brain regions: P = 0.004). Arterial blood pressure increased significantly only at 4 to 8 min after return of spontaneous circulation ( P < 0.001) and acidosis decreased ( P = 0.009). While M101 applied during cardiac arrest did not significantly change inflammation or brain oxygenation, the data suggest cerebral damage reduction due to hypoxic brain injury, measured by phospho-tau. Global burden of ischemia appeared reduced because acidosis was less severe. Whether postcardiac arrest infusion of M101 improves brain oxygenation is unknown and needs to be investigated.

Development and early diagnosis of critical illness myopathy in COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly increased the incidence and clinical importance of critical illness myopathy (CIM), because it is one of the most common complications of modern intensive care medicine. Current diagnostic criteria only allow diagnosis of CIM at an advanced stage, so that patients are at risk of being overlooked, especially in early stages. To determine the frequency of CIM and to assess a recently proposed tool for early diagnosis, we have followed a cohort of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and compared the time course of muscle excitability measurements with the definite diagnosis of CIM. METHODS: Adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland requiring mechanical ventilation were recruited and examined on Days 1, 2, 5, and 10 post-intubation. Clinical examination, muscle excitability measurements, medication record, and laboratory analyses were performed on all study visits, and additionally nerve conduction studies, electromyography and muscle biopsy on Day 10. Muscle excitability data were compared with a cohort of 31 age-matched healthy subjects. Diagnosis of definite CIM was made according to the current guidelines and was based on patient history, results of clinical and electrophysiological examinations as well as muscle biopsy. RESULTS: Complete data were available in 31 out of 44 recruited patients (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [9.8] years). Of these, 17 (55%) developed CIM. Muscle excitability measurements on Day 10 discriminated between patients who developed CIM and those who did not, with a diagnostic precision of 90% (AUC 0.908; 95% CI 0.799-1.000; sensitivity 1.000; specificity 0.714). On Days 1 and 2, muscle excitability parameters also discriminated between the two groups with 73% (AUC 0.734; 95% CI 0.550-0.919; sensitivity 0.562; specificity 0.857) and 82% (AUC 0.820; CI 0.652-0.903; sensitivity 0.750; specificity 0.923) diagnostic precision, respectively. All critically ill COVID-19 patients showed signs of muscle membrane depolarization compared with healthy subjects, but in patients who developed CIM muscle membrane depolarization on Days 1, 2 and 10 was more pronounced than in patients who did not develop CIM. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a 55% prevalence of definite CIM in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, the results confirm that muscle excitability measurements may serve as an alternative method for CIM diagnosis and support its use as a tool for early diagnosis and monitoring the development of CIM.