Toxicologic evaluation of modified gum acacia: mutagenicity, acute and subchronic toxicity.

Modified gum acacia, produced from acacia gum by a process analogous to the production of modified food starch, was tested for mutagenicity in the microbial reverse mutation assay. The assay employed a wide range of dose levels, both with and without metabolic activation. Test results gave no indication that modified gum acacia possessed any mutagenic potential. The acute oral toxicity of modified gum acacia was determined in two studies employing Sprague-Dawley rats, and the LD50 values were found to be >2000 mg/kg. The primary dermal irritation potential of modified gum acacia was evaluated in rabbits by the Draize method. Test results indicated that modified gum acacia was slightly irritating by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classification but not a primary irritant by Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) guidelines. The subchronic toxicity of modified gum acacia was examined in Sprague-Dawley rats fed diets containing 0%, 1%, 2.5%, and 5% modified gum acacia for 13 weeks. No dose-related effects on survival, growth, hematology, blood chemistry, organ weights, or pathologic lesions were observed. Results of these studies indicate that modified gum acacia does not possess mutagenic potential and that animals are not adversely affected by acute or subchronic exposure to modified gum acacia.

Preparation of a stable double emulsion (W1/O/W2): role of the interfacial films on the stability of the system.

This paper presents new protocols enabling preparation of W1/O/W2 double emulsions: one, using soybean oil as the O phase, that yields edible emulsions with industrial applications, and a second that yields emulsions with a previously unattainable concentration 15% (w/w) of surfactants in the external phase (the 15% target was chosen to meet the typical industry standard). Preparation of a stable W1/O emulsion was found to be critical for the stability of the system as a whole. Of the various low HLB primary surfactants tested, only cethyl dimethicone copolyol (Abil EM90), A-B-A block copolymer (Arlacel P135), and polyglycerol ester of ricinoleic acid (Grinstead PGR-90) yielded a stable W/O emulsion. Investigation of the surface properties of those surfactants using the monolayer technique found two significant similarities: (1) stable, compressible, and reversibly expandable monolayers; and (2) high elasticity and surface potential. The high degree of elasticity of the interfacial film between W1 and O makes it highly resilient under stress; its failure to break contributes to the stability of the emulsion. The high surface potential values observed suggest that the surfactant molecules lie flat at the O/W interfaces. In particular, in the case of PGR-90, the hydroxyl (-OH) groups on the fatty acid chains serve as anchors at the O/W interfaces and are responsible for the high surface potential. The long-term stability of the double emulsion requires a balance between the Laplace and osmotic pressures (between W1 droplets in O and between W1 droplets and the external aqueous phase W2). The presence of a thickener in the outer phase is necessary in order to reach a viscosity ratio (preferably approximately 1) between the W1/O and W2 phases, allowing dispersion of the viscous primary emulsion into the W2 aqueous phase. The thickener, which also serves as a dispersant and consequently prevents phase separation due to its thixotropic properties, must be compatible with the surfactants. Finally, the interactions between the low and high HLB emulsifiers at the O/W2 interface should not destabilize the films. It was observed that such destructive interaction for the system could be prevented by the use of two high HLB surfactants in the outer aqueous phase: an amphoteric surfactant, Betaine, and an anionic surfactant, sodium lauryl ether sulfate. The combination of such pairs of surfactants was found to contribute to the films' stability.