Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 162(3): 895-905, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825332

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures. METHODS: This case-control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double-layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double-layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: In all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow-up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050). CONCLUSION: The use of double-layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.


Assuntos
Cicatriz , Útero , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Cicatriz/diagnóstico por imagem , Cicatriz/epidemiologia , Cicatriz/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Útero/cirurgia , Suturas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...