Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(44): e28073, 2022 Nov 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36343062

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Talar neck fractures are injuries which frequently result in adverse outcomes or impairment of functional activity. Four groups were identified according to Hawkins classification and Canale modification. We present a female patient with a fractured neck of the talus associated with talonavicular dislocation, but intact tibiotalar and subtalar joints; an injury pattern not fulfilling the criteria described in the Hawkins classification. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 46-year-old woman missed a step and fell down stairs with an immediate painful right ankle and inability to bear weight. DIAGNOSIS: Talar neck fracture with an unusual isolated talonavicular dislocation. INTERVENTIONS: Temporary closed reduction followed by open reduction and internal fixation were performed. OUTCOMES: The patient had excellent functional and radiological outcomes following surgical management. CONCLUSION: We discuss the management of this rare case in addition to a review of the current literature to provide the best evidence-based recommendations for this injury pattern.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Luxações Articulares , Lesões do Pescoço , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Tálus , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tálus/diagnóstico por imagem , Tálus/cirurgia , Tálus/lesões , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Luxações Articulares/complicações , Redução Aberta , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Lesões do Pescoço/complicações
2.
Patient Saf Surg ; 16(1): 6, 2022 Jan 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081968

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current literature suggests that wrong-level spine surgery is relatively common with far-reaching consequences. This study aims to assess the current practices of spinal surgeons across the UK with respect to the techniques implemented for correct level verification. METHODS: To assess the current practices of spinal surgeons across the UK with respect to the techniques implemented for level verification. The authors hypothesise the absence of a standardised technique used across spine surgeons in the UK. Practices amongst respondents will be ascertained via an electronic questionnaire designed to evaluate current practices of spinal surgeons whom are members of the British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS). The study data will include key information such as; the level of surgical experience, specific techniques used to perform level checks for each procedure and prior involvement with wrong-level spine surgery. Responses were collected over the period of 1 month with a reminder sent 2 weeks prior to closure of the survey. The data were collated and descriptive analyses performed on multiple-choice question answers and common themes established from free text answers. RESULTS: A total of 27% (n = 105/383) members responded. The vast majority had greater than 10 years' experience. Intraoperative practices varied greatly with varying practices present for cervical, thoracic and lumbar level surgery. Only 38% (n = 40) of respondents re-checked the level intra-operatively, prior to instrumentation. Of the respondents 47.5% (n = 29/61) of surgeons had been involved in wrong level spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the varying practices amongst spinal surgeons and suggests root cause for wrong-level spine surgery; where the level identified pre-incision was subsequently not the level exposed. We describe a novel safety-check adopted at our institute using concepts and lessons learnt from the WHO Checklist.

3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(3)2021 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33649039

RESUMO

Transient osteoporosis of the hip (TOH) is a rare cause of pelvic pain in the third trimester of pregnancy and post partum. Although several cases have been reported in literature, its aetiology is poorly understood. The diagnosis is commonly missed in pregnancy, as the presenting symptoms can be vague, and the risks of radiographic imaging deter clinicians from pursuing investigation. In extreme cases, this pathology presents with neck of femur fractures, with no current guidelines on optimal management. We describe the case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with bilateral neck of femur fractures at 34 weeks gestation. Following an emergency caesarean section, operative management consisted of bilateral closed reduction and internal fixation using dynamic hip screws. Postoperative radiographs demonstrated failure of fixation on the left side, which was revised to a complex primary arthroplasty. This case demonstrates both the diagnostic and management challenges associated with TOH.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Ortopedia , Osteoporose , Complicações na Gravidez , Adulto , Cesárea , Feminino , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fêmur , Humanos , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações na Gravidez/cirurgia , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 47, 2021 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33430910

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of cephalo-medullary nails (CMN) is a widely accepted management option for the treatment of unstable per-trochanteric hip fractures. A growing body of literature has reported good functional and radiological outcomes in patients managed with a dynamic hip screw supplemented with a trochanteric stabilisation plate (DHS w/ TSP). However, a robust meta-analysis does not exist in the current literature comparing the two fixation methods. PURPOSES: Management of these kinds of injuries is very challenging in orthopaedic practice, yet no strong evidence is in place to delineate which implant gives the best results. This meta-analysis is the first to determine the efficacy of CMN versus DHS w/ TSP. METHODS: An up-to-date literature search was performed using a predetermined search strategy and eligibility criteria. All suitable literature was appraised for methodological quality using the Cochrane's collaboration tool. Hospital stay, operative time, intra-operative complication rate, mechanical failure rate, infection rates, revision rates and functional outcomes were all considered. RESULTS: A total of five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results of this analysis suggest that CMN is only associated with lower revision rates when compared to DHS w/ TSP; however, no significant difference was found in terms of hospital stay, operative time, blood transfusion, complications rate and functional outcome. CONCLUSION: Both CMN and DHS w/TSP proved to be reliable in the management of unstable per-trochanteric fractures; however, more extensive datasets are required to draw robust conclusions.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Placas Ósseas , Parafusos Ósseos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...