RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although the supraorbital (SO) keyhole approach has a wide range of indications, its routine usefulness with the advance of current technology has not been fully evaluated. In an attempt to address this issue, a cadaveric morphometric analysis to the supra- and parasellar regions was performed, comparing the standard Pterional craniotomy (PT) with the SO keyhole. METHODS: ETOH-fixed and silicone-injected human cadaveric heads were used. SO (n = 8) and PT craniotomies (n = 8) were performed. Pre- and post-dissection CT, along with pre-dissection MRI scans were also completed for neuro-navigation purposes, aimed to verify predetermined anatomical landmarks selected for morphometric analysis. RESULTS: Notwithstanding the smaller craniotomy, the SO approach allowed optimal anatomical exposure when compared to the PT approach. With 30° of head rotation, the SO keyhole showed a wider surgical field of the suprasellar region. CONCLUSIONS: Using detailed preoperative image-guided surgical planning, the SO keyhole approach offered an appropriate alternative route to the supra- and parasellar regions, compared to the PT craniotomy.
