Use of industrial liquid silicone: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Illicit cosmetic injections remain highly prevalent and can cause serious complications, including death. We aimed to explore existing literature regarding the use of illicit cosmetic injections globally. METHODS: We searched six databases with no language restriction from inception to 2022. We included all articles focused on adult patients of any gender who received any illicit cosmetic injection. Screening and data extraction followed standards from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. RESULTS: After screening 629 abstracts and 193 full texts, 142 citations were included. We identified articles from 28 countries and three multi-country studies. Most were from high-income (75.3%) and upper-middle-income countries (21.8%). Of all patients whose gender identity was described, 49.9% were transgender women, and 40.8% were cisgender women. The anatomic regions most frequently injected were the buttocks (35%) and the breast (13.3%). The most frequently described complications were granuloma (41.5%), dermatological problems (41.5%), infection (35.9%), and pulmonary complications (34.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed the impact of illicit silicone injections, particularly on cisgender women and transgender individuals. Existing barriers must be addressed, including healthcare prejudice and inadequate knowledge about care for gender minorities. This will require educating at-risk groups and enhancing policies to regulate these procedures.

Use of industrial liquid silicone: a scoping review

Purpose: Illicit cosmetic injections remain highly prevalent and can cause serious complications, including death. We aimed to explore existing literature regarding the use of illicit cosmetic injections globally. Methods: We searched six databases with no language restriction from inception to 2022. We included all articles focused on adult patients of any gender who received any illicit cosmetic injection. Screening and data extraction followed standards from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Results: After screening 629 abstracts and 193 full texts, 142 citations were included. We identified articles from 28 countries and three multi-country studies. Most were from high-income (75.3%) and upper-middle-income countries (21.8%). Of all patients whose gender identity was described, 49.9% were transgender women, and 40.8% were cisgender women. The anatomic regions most frequently injected were the buttocks (35%) and the breast (13.3%). The most frequently described complications were granuloma (41.5%), dermatological problems (41.5%), infection (35.9%), and pulmonary complications (34.5%). Conclusions: We observed the impact of illicit silicone injections, particularly on cisgender women and transgender individuals. Existing barriers must be addressed, including healthcare prejudice and inadequate knowledge about care for gender minorities. This will require educating at-risk groups and enhancing policies to regulate these procedures.

Promovendo equidade de gênero nas especialidades cirúrgicas: experiência de programa de mentoria na América Latina / Promoting gender equity in surgical specialties: experience from a mentorship program in Latin America

Resumo: Introdução: Cirurgia global é uma área que advoga por melhores desfechos e equidade para todos que demandam assistência cirúrgica, anestésica e obstétrica. No Brasil, embora as mulheres componham 46,6% da demografia médica em 2020, inequidades de gênero persistem nas especialidades cirúrgicas. O objetivo deste artigo é relatar a experiência do programa de mentoria do Gender Equity Initiative in Global Surgery como mecanismo de promoção de equidade de gênero. Relato de experiência: O programa almeja capacitar, empoderar e amplificar vozes de minorias de gênero, sendo voluntário e sem fins lucrativos. Baseia-se na criação de pequenos grupos heterogêneos, com diferentes graus de experiência acadêmica e pessoal. As inscrições ocorrem por formulário on-line, com perguntas relacionadas à identidade, a interesses e expectativas dos aplicantes, sendo os grupos organizados de acordo com essas informações. Os mentores são selecionados com base em: nível de treinamento, especialidade, identidade de gênero e expectativas. Realizam-se três acompanhamentos por preenchimento de questionário pelos participantes. Discussão: A necessidade de programas como este durante a pandemia é evidente, mostrando-se como uma iniciativa positiva para desenvolver estratégias de enfrentamento dos desafios vivenciados. Este relato fornece uma visão geral de como um programa de mentoria pode contribuir para que mais estudantes de Medicina sejam incentivados a seguir carreiras em cirurgia, anestesia e obstetrícia, de modo a promover equidade de gênero para além da perspectiva binária, e discute as principais dificuldades em se estabelecerem programas como esse na América Latina. Conclusão: É preciso reforçar que não basta apenas dar suporte a mulheres (cis e trans) e pessoas de gênero não binário, mas também educar a sociedade para compreender identidades de gênero além da perspectiva binária, reconhecendo os impactos nas relações de trabalho e perspectivas de carreira, especialmente dentro do campo cirúrgico.

Abstract: Introduction: Global surgery is an area that advocates for better outcomes and equity for everyone who requires surgical, anesthetic, and obstetric assistance. In Brazil, although women represent 46.6% of medical demographics in 2020, gender equity disparities persist in surgical specialties. The objective of this article is to report the experience of the mentoring program from the Gender Equity Initiative in Global Surgery as a mechanism for promoting gender equity. Experience report: The voluntary and non-profit program aims to train, empower, and amplify voices of gender minorities. It is based on the creation of small heterogeneous groups, with different degrees of academic and professional experience. Applications are made via an online form, with questions related to the identity, interests, and expectations of applicants, and the groups are organized according to this information. Mentors are selected based on the level of training, specialty, gender identity, and expectations. The participants then have three follow-up sessions conducted by completing questionnaires. Discussion: The need for programs like this during the pandemic is evident, proving to be a positive initiative to develop strategies to tackle the challenges experienced. This report provides an overview of how a mentoring program can contribute to greater adherence for medical students to pursue careers in surgery, anesthesia, and obstetrics, promoting gender equity beyond the binary perspective and discussing the main difficulties in establishing similar programs in Latin America. Conclusion: It is necessary to reinforce that educating and supporting women (cisgender and transgender) and non-binary gendered people are not enough, but to educate society to understand gender identities beyond the binary perspective, recognizing the impacts on work relationships and career perspectives, especially within the surgical field.