Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ochsner J ; 13(3): 359-66, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24052765

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis, an inflammatory response to an infection that may lead to severe organ dysfunction and death, is the leading cause of death in medical intensive care units. The Society of Critical Care Medicine has issued guidelines and promoted protocols to improve the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Generally, the medical community has been slow to adopt these guidelines because of the system challenges associated with protocol implementation. We describe an interdisciplinary team approach to the development and implementation of management protocols for treating patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: To determine the effectiveness of the bundled emergency department and critical care order sets developed by the Sepsis Steering Committee, we performed a case review of 1,105 sequential patients admitted to a large academic tertiary referral hospital with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock between July 2008 and January 2012. RESULTS: Implementation of the protocol led to improved order set use over time, a significant decrease in the median time to antibiotics of 140 (range 1-820) minutes in 2008 to 72 (range 1-1,020) minutes in 2011 (P≤0.001), and a decrease in median length of stay from 8 days (range 1-54) in 2008 to 7 days (range 1-33) in 2011 (P=0.036). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary team approach to sepsis management using protocols and early goal-directed therapy is feasible in a large academic medical center to improve the process of care and outcomes.

2.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 25(4): 180-5, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21654373

RESUMO

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to measure outcomes following implementation of standardized order sets for managing patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Sepsis is a severe illness, affecting approximately 750 000 people in the United States, with mortality rates of 28% to 50%, and costing $17 billion each year. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An interdisciplinary team was created to improve early recognition and process of care in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. Education was rolled out over 6 months, and sepsis "bundle" order sets were implemented. SETTING AND SAMPLE: Adult patients (N = 674) with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who were admitted to an emergency department or critical care unit at a 563-bed tertiary care teaching facility from May 2008 through October 2010 were included in data analysis. METHODS: A plan, do, study, act methodology was used. Outcomes following project implementation were measured prospectively including appropriate recognition of patients with a diagnosis of sepsis, hospital site where the order set was initiated, and attainment of treatment goals within 6 hours of onset of severe sepsis/septic shock. FINDINGS: When order set usage was analyzed, the use of order sets was significantly associated with meeting "6-hour goals" successfully (χ1 [n = 662] = 36.16, P < .001); order set usage explained 24% of the variation in meeting goals, R = 0.24, F1,661 = 38.51, P < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: Order sets improved management of septic patients through effective change in delivery systems to support evidence-based medical care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Administrative support, team collaboration, and standardized order sets can lead to improved process of care.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Sepse/terapia , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Relações Interprofissionais , Enfermeiros Clínicos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/enfermagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Choque Séptico/enfermagem , Choque Séptico/terapia
3.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 6: 603-11, 2010 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20730016

RESUMO

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an integral part of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD). CHD is the leading cause of death in industrialized nations and there is a constant effort to develop preventative strategies. The emphasis is on risk stratification and primary risk prevention in asymptomatic patients to decrease cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The Framingham Risk Score predicts CHD events only moderately well where family history is not included as a risk factor. There has been an exploration for new tests for better risk stratification and risk factor modification. While the Framingham Risk Score, European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Project, and European Prospective Cardiovascular Munster study remain excellent tools for risk factor modification, the CAC score may have additional benefit in risk assessment. There have been several studies supporting the role of CAC score for prediction of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality. It has been shown to have great scope in risk stratification of asymptomatic patients in the emergency room. Additionally, it may help in assessment of progression or regression of coronary artery disease. Furthermore, the CAC score may help differentiate ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy.


Assuntos
Calcinose/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Doenças Assintomáticas , Calcinose/patologia , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Angiografia Coronária , Doença das Coronárias/patologia , Doença das Coronárias/prevenção & controle , Progressão da Doença , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais
4.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 6: 307-16, 2010 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20531948

RESUMO

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a rapidly evolving test for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Although invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard for coronary artery disease (CAD), CCTA is an excellent noninvasive tool for evaluation of chest pain. There is ample evidence to support the cost-effective use of CCTA in the early triage process of patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency room. CCTA plays a critical role in the diagnosis of chest pain etiology as one of potentially fatal conditions, aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction. This 'triple rule out' protocol is becoming an increasingly practicable and popular diagnostic tool in ERs across the country. In addition to a quick triage of chest pain patients, it may improve quality of care, decrease cost, and prevent medico-legal risk for missing potentially lethal conditions presenting as chest pain. CCTA is also helpful in the detection of subclinical and vulnerable coronary plaques. The major limitations for wide spread acceptance of this test include radiation exposure, motion artifacts, and its suboptimal imaging with increased body mass index.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/organização & administração , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Hospitais Comunitários/organização & administração , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Triagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...