Resection of Bar in the Management of Calcaneonavicular Coalition: A Systematic Review.

The most commonly encountered type of tarsal coalition in symptomatic patients is the calcaneonavicular coalition. Non-surgical treatments are effective for most patients. However, if surgery is required, excision of the calcaneonavicular bar can be a successful option that preserves hindfoot mobility and function. We conducted a systematic review of calcaneonavicular bar excision in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. To conduct the review, we conducted a thorough search of several databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and bibliographies. We analyzed the chosen studies to collect information on patient demographics, clinical outcomes, surgical techniques, and potential complications. We identified 11 studies that included 274 patients for a total of 394 feet. The average age of patients in these studies was 12.5 years, ranging from 8.2 to 19.4 years. Follow-up periods varied from 2.3 to 23 years, with an average duration of 5.9 years. Excision of the calcaneonavicular bar was performed at 380 feet, while fusion was performed at 14 feet. In 50.5% of the feet, the extensor digitorum brevis was used as an interposition material. Successful outcomes after bar excision were observed in 82.9% of cases (304 feet) and were described as satisfactory, improved, good, or excellent outcomes. In one study, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score improved from 47.89 to 90.22 in 12 feet after bar excision. Recurrence was reported in 52 feet out of the 380 feet that underwent bar excision. Progression of arthritis in the ankle and subtalar joint was reported in 25 feet. Various complications were reported, including paraesthesia in the hindfoot (three feet), midfoot pain (three feet), hindfoot pain (two feet), mild wound infection (one foot), and swelling and stiffness (one foot). Surgical excision of the calcaneonavicular bar has shown successful outcomes in most patients, regardless of the use of interposition material. These outcomes are associated with minimal and acceptable complications. However, since the studies conducted in the literature were single-center retrospective and prospective trials, a multicenter prospective study with patient-centered, validated outcomes would provide a better opportunity to support the evidence in favor of surgical excision of the calcaneonavicular bar. Overall, the use of various interposition materials is associated with reduced chances of recurrence compared to cases where no interposition material was used.

Effect of Peri-Operative Blood Transfusion on Short and Long-Term Mortality Rates in Elderly Patients With Neck of Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction  The current reported mortality rate for elderly neck of femur fractures (eNOFF) is relatively high in the UK. eNOFF patients commonly suffer from associated cardiovascular co-morbidities and tend to have fragile physiological states and poor physiological reserves. Although some studies have shown a potential link between blood transfusion and mortality in eNOFF patients, there is no general consensus on this matter. Therefore, our study aims to explore the possible association between blood transfusion and length of hospital stay (LOHS) as well as short- and long-term mortality rates in eNOFF patients by reviewing the practice of blood transfusion. Methods  This retrospective study was conducted at Wrexham Maelor Hospital, which is part of the Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB), Wales. The study included patients who were 65 years of age or older and presented with neck of femur fractures. Only patients who required surgical intervention were included, and those managed non-operatively were excluded from the study. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Furthermore, unpaired t-tests and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests were performed to compare the groups that received blood transfusions.  Results  During the study period, a total of 501 eNOFF patients were included in the primary cohort of the study, with a mean age of 81 years (ranging from 65 to 102). The majority of the patients were female (n=340). Of the 501 patients, 79 (15.8%) received a blood transfusion during their treatment. Around 52.9% of the eNOFF patients were categorized as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III, but there was no statistically significant difference in the requirement of blood transfusion between patients in ASA III, II, and IV categories, as compared to ASA I. Additionally, the mean time to surgery was higher in patients who received a blood transfusion (35.8 hours), and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.035). Moreover, the average LOHS after surgery for eNOFF was longer in patients who needed peri-operative blood transfusion (22 days), and this difference in the means was statistically significant (p=0.022). At the one-year post-surgery mark, mortality was higher in the transfused group (33%), and long-term five-year mortality rates were also higher in this group (63.2%).  Conclusion  Peri-operative blood transfusion may confer certain benefits in the management of eNOFF ptients. However, it should not be regarded as a panacea for improving long-term outcomes. The decision to administer blood transfusion must be made on a case-by-case basis, with careful assessment of individual clinical indications, and the potential risks and benefits taken into consideration. To achieve optimal clinical outcomes, close monitoring and follow-up of eNOFF patients, both in the short-term and long-term, are essential.

Microbiological Profile and Clinical Features of Septic Arthritis of the Shoulder: A 10-Year Cohort Single-Centre Study.

Introduction  Septic arthritis (SA) constitutes a pressing orthopedic emergency characterized by acute, non-traumatic joint pain. Timely diagnosis and intervention are imperative to avert complications such as chondrolysis and systemic sepsis. The etiology is predominantly hematogenous, necessitating an integrated approach involving surgical and microbiological modalities. Shoulder aspiration and microbiological analysis play pivotal roles in guiding treatment, especially when positive findings prompt more aggressive therapeutic strategies. This study aims to elucidate the nuanced clinical and epidemiological characteristics of septic arthritis in both native and prosthetic joints within a singular institutional cohort over a decade. Methods  This retrospective case series analysis spanned a 10-year period, focusing on non-prosthetic shoulder joints from January 2012 to July 2021. In this timeframe, only 183 aspirations were performed and sent to the microbiology department for analysis, including cultures, microscopy, and antibiotic sensitivity tests for positive cultures. The study delved into the microbiological profile of infections, encompassing gram stain, culture positivity rates, identification of microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Additionally, the incidence of primary joint infections with resistant strains, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was scrutinized. Statistical analysis utilized the SPSS program version 20.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York), with a significance level set at 5%. The project, registered with the trust's clinical audit department (Reg #5372), adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Data collection involved extracting non-identifiable patient modifiers from the laboratory database bank into Excel spreadsheets. Results  The study included 183 patients, with 108 (59%) females and 75 (41%) males. The average age was 76.2±16.5 years. Among them, 138 (75.4%) reported pain, and 15 (8.2%) had a body temperature over 37.8°C. Lab results showed a mean white blood cell count of 11.6±4.5 and an average C-reactive protein level of 121.7±102.1. Leucocytosis (>11,000 WBC) was seen in 82 (44.8%) cases. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; >10 mg/dl) was found in 136 (74.3%) patients. Synovial fluid analysis revealed no crystals in 91.3% of cases. Microbial resistance analysis showed 19 strains resistant to co-trimoxazole and 11 to erythromycin. Among co-trimoxazole-resistant strains, 73.7% were Staphylococcus aureus, a statistically significant association (p<0.001). Conclusion The evolving sensitivity patterns of microbes in septic arthritis underscore the necessity to reassess empirical antibiotic therapy. Subsequent joint damage resulting from infection can result in substantial disability.

Clinical Audit of Manipulation of Paediatric Forearm Fractures in the Emergency Department at a District General Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background Early reduction of paediatric forearm fractures under procedural analgesia has the benefit of avoiding admission and general anaesthesia. In addition to lowering the risks of treatment and reducing the number of treatment episodes, this approach also reduces the psychological stresses on the child and the parents. British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) and Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) guidelines recommend that all units managing paediatric fractures should have protocols to facilitate procedural analgesia for manipulation of forearm fractures. A recent standard operating procedure has been created for this purpose and has outlined local standards to adhere to. Regular audits of paediatric manipulations in the emergency department must be undertaken in line with GIRFT recommendations. The aim is to identify potential barriers to implementation, which can be improved, and to ensure that a high standard of care is delivered.  Aim The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the introduction of local guidelines on the manipulation of paediatric fractures in the emergency department, to assess the adherence of the emergency/orthopaedic departments with these guidelines, and to assess the outcome of all childhood forearm manipulations at University Hospitals Dorset (UHD), to help guide further practice. Material and methods This was a retrospective and prospective study in which the patients admitted to Poole Hospital, Poole, United Kingdom were identified according to the criteria and were analyzed in three separate groups in terms of pre-implementation and post-implementation. Patients were gathered from the orthopaedic on-call trauma lists. All paediatric patients who had a forearm fracture were included (including those who were not manipulated). The first group was the surveillance group in which a clinical audit was completed to review if any of the paediatric patients with forearm fractures were being manipulated in accident and emergency (A&E). The second group included the patients for whom the first standard operating procedure documentation was initiated with the intention of improving the service provided and reduce the number of paediatric forearm fractures going to theatre for simple manipulation and prevent a general anaesthetic. The third group was to review the established pathway and to see which areas of the pathway needed focus to make it better and more in line with the flow of patients through the emergency department. These plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles took place from March 2022 to March 2023. Paediatric patients with open or neurovascular damage were excluded from the cohort. The findings and the data were analysed in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) and presented through regional meetings to discuss the progress and potential changes in making the pathway by involving all the stakeholders, i.e., the emergency department, orthopaedic department, and theatre managers. Results  An overall reduction was seen in paediatric forearm fractures going to theatre. Almost 30% of the forearm fractures were attended to in the emergency department, identification of factors that affect the numbers was quantified, and improvement in documentation throughout the PDSA cycles was observed.

Periprosthetic Fractures in Long Versus Short Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures: A 10-Year Single-Centre Cohort Study.

Background Neck of femur (NOF) fractures, including intertrochanteric fractures, are common fragility fractures seen in the elderly population and are often amenable to fixation with a proximal femoral nail (PFN). However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the incidence of peri-prosthetic fractures with each device. Several studies from the 1990s and a recent meta-analysis have shown a higher incidence of peri-prosthetic fractures in the short PFN cohort. Other studies have shown a lower reoperation rate with short PFNs, and no statistically significant differences have been quoted in the rates of peri-prosthetic fractures in systematic reviews. Aim The purpose of this retrospective study, therefore, was to assess the peri-prosthetic fracture rate and failure rates of elderly neck of femur (NOF) fractures implanted with either a short or long proximal femoral nail (PFN). Materials and methods A retrospective study was conducted in a single orthopaedic department (University Hospital Dorset, Poole, GBR) using collected data on all extracapsular neck of femur fracture patients from the national hip fracture database (NHFD) from January 1, 2011, to December 23, 2021. The data collected included patient age, sex, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) type of neck of femur fracture, type of surgery performed, any further peri-prosthetic fractures, and time to re-operation in that subset of the group. The implants used were the Stryker Gamma 3 Nail and the Smith Nephew (Trigen and Intertan). All patients were allowed to fully weight bear as tolerated and received both orthopaedic and elderly medical care. Failure was defined as a cut-out or implant fracture. Results From January 1, 2011, to December 23, 2021, there were 1010 extracapsular neck of femur fractures recorded on the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) treated with a PFN from the study centre. Of those patients, 11 had pathological fractures and were excluded. 649 patients had long PFNs, and 350 had short PFNs. Of the total of 999 patients, 254 (25%) were male and 745 (75%) were female. More than 80% of the patients in the sample were over the age of 75. The majority of patients in both groups had A1/A2 fractures (short 84.3%, long 49.1%). The rate of periprosthetic fractures in the short PFNs was 1.71%, and the failure rate was 0.57%. The rate of periprosthetic fractures in the long PFNs was 0.62%, with a failure rate of 0.92%. The multi-nominal logistic regression model did not show statistically significant odds ratios (OR) for the following variables: long/short nails, male/female gender, age, ASA, or type of fracture. The female gender was associated with a higher risk of both periprosthetic fractures and failures (OR of 2.232 and 2.95), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Similarly, unstable A3 fractures had a much higher risk of failure (OR of 2.691) compared to periprosthetic fractures (OR of 0.985). However, this was not statistically significant. Conclusion Overall, this study has identified that in a patient population that is predominantly female and over the age of 75, the risk of periprosthetic fracture rate and the failure rate is similar in both the use of a short or a long PFN for intertrochanteric fractures.

Expediting the Management of Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) in the Emergency Department Through Clinical Pathway Design at a District General Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is an uncommon condition that occurs due to compression of the terminal portion of the spinal cord. Early recognition and intervention in CES are crucial for an improved prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and action may lead to irreversible adverse effects, i.e., permanent disability, and in some circumstances can lead to litigation. AIM:  The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to identify areas for improvement and expedite the management of suspected CES patients presenting to the hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study in which patients admitted to the Poole district hospital were analyzed in three groups with more than 50 patients in each subset group. The first group was audited from 1st October 2020 to 27th November 2020; a re-audit on the second group of patients was done from 1st June 2021 to 16th July 2021; the third group was re-audited from 1st of January 2022 to 31st of March 2022. RESULTS: There were a total of 168 patients in all audit groups, of whom 71% were female. The mean time from getting triaged to having an MRI improved from 13hrs 54mins to 10hrs 39mins. The total inpatient length of stay (LOS) of less than 24 hours was 28% in the first cycle and improved to 54.4% by the third cycle of the audit. Eight patients exhibited a diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome (CES) and were sent to the tertiary care center. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement project identified delays in requesting the MRI for the diagnosis of CES and was addressed by ED booking the scans directly. This, in turn, reduced the length of stay in the hospital for patients who did not have cauda equina syndrome.

A Clinical Audit of Orthopaedic Operation Note Documentation and Digitalization of the Operative Note Template: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background Good communication between a surgical team and other colleagues is vital, and the medium of communication is often the operative note. It is essential to ensure continuity of care between the operating team and other colleagues; also, it provides a medicolegal record of patient care. It checks all the four main domains of good surgical practice guidelines set by the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) of England. The aims of this project were to evaluate the quality of operation notes against the set parameters by the RCS and to improve quality of the operative notes using information technology (IT) service software update to provide operative note digitalization. Methods This was a retrospective and prospective closed-loop audit, in which the operative notes were analysed for the Trauma and Orthopaedics speciality. Three separate cycles of audits were completed. In the the first cycle, data were collected retrospectively from all the operative notes, from June 1, 2020, to June 15, 2020; then, data were collected prospectively after making interventions to establish digitalization of the operative notes. The second cycle was completed from February 14 to 21, 2021, and from March 1 to 7, 2021. The third cycle was completed from August 1 to 31, 2021. All data were collected in Excel using a checklist that evaluated 34 parameters. These parameters were based on the recommendations of RCS Good Surgical Practice guidelines. All trauma and orthopaedic patients were included regardless of the type of procedure. There were no exclusion criteria in place. Results An overall increase from 9.5% to 66.7% in typed operative notes was achieved with the introduction of the templated operative note documentation service. There was a 40% reduction in the use of handwritten operative notes. Concerns regarding legibility were reduced in view of the digitalization of the operative notes. The first cycle of the audit, in terms of the parameters yielded, found that the operative notes were missing 10 important parameters, independent of the author grade; these were recorded in less than 10% of the operative notes. The second cycle, in terms of the parameters yielded, found that the operative notes were missing four important parameters, independent of the author grade; these were recorded in less than 10% of the operative notes. The third cycle of the audit, in terms of the parameters yielded, found that the operative notes were missing three important parameters. Specific documentation for 12 different parameters improved over the course of the three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Conclusion Royal College of Surgeons guidelines and integration with IT services significantly improved the quality and legibility of operative notes that were being documented in the trauma and orthopaedics department. Structured document standards and good integration with a computer-based IT service help prompt surgeons to document in a better and easy way, thereby leading to improved clinical documentation.

Histopathological Account of Obstetrical and Gynecological Specimens: Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Care Center of Peshawar.

Introduction Histopathologic specimen examination of surgically isolated organs and tissues yields valuable information regarding a disease process and plays a vital role in the future management of a patient. Our aim was to account for the common diagnosis yielded from histopathological specimens of the obstetrics and gynecology department and to determine if all the obstetric and gynecological specimens should be routinely sent for histopathology. Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at the histopathology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar. Data were acquired for all gynecological and obstetric specimens sent for histopathology for analysis to the histopathology unit during August 2018 and July 2019. Any sample that was not sent via surgical excision was excluded from the study. Results A total of 922 samples were sent for histopathological analysis in the tertiary care hospital. The mean age of patients who had their specimens sent for pathology was 40.78 ± 10.81 years. Most of the samples sent were of the uterus (458) and the age 31-50 years (270) had the highest proportion of histopathological specimens. Normal ovaries (64.4%) and fallopian tubes (78.8%) were the main diagnoses for these two specimens while a normal cervix (0.58%) was the least common diagnosis among samples sent for histopathology. Chronic cervicitis (92.4%) in cervix and secretory phase endometrium (30.1%) in the uterus were the other common diagnosis. All the other samples were infrequently sent. Conclusion Uterine specimens are the most common histopathological specimen sent followed by cervix and then fallopian tube. Fallopian tube and ovaries yielded the highest normal diagnosis. Cervix specimens must be biopsied. More data is needed for a certain consensus on the need for routine histopathology.