RESUMO
This systematic review offers an overview on clinical and technical aspects of augmented reality (AR) applications in orthopedic and maxillofacial oncological surgery. The review also provides a summary of the included articles with objectives and major findings for both specialties. The search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases and returned on 31 May 2023. All articles of the last 10 years found by keywords augmented reality, mixed reality, maxillofacial oncology and orthopedic oncology were considered in this study. For orthopedic oncology, a total of 93 articles were found and only 9 articles were selected following the defined inclusion criteria. These articles were subclassified further based on study type, AR display type, registration/tracking modality and involved anatomical region. Similarly, out of 958 articles on maxillofacial oncology, 27 articles were selected for this review and categorized further in the same manner. The main outcomes reported for both specialties are related to registration error (i.e., how the virtual objects displayed in AR appear in the wrong position relative to the real environment) and surgical accuracy (i.e., resection error) obtained under AR navigation. However, meta-analysis on these outcomes was not possible due to data heterogenicity. Despite having certain limitations related to the still immature technology, we believe that AR is a viable tool to be used in oncological surgeries of orthopedic and maxillofacial field, especially if it is integrated with an external navigation system to improve accuracy. It is emphasized further to conduct more research and pre-clinical testing before the wide adoption of AR in clinical settings.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Undercorrection is a common problem in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). We investigated the compression effect of cortex screw on the osteotomy gap and its clinical significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standard OWHTO using the TomoFix plate was conducted on 20 bone models in two groups to get a 10-mm medial osteotomy gap. A cortex screw was used temporarily in a neutral (at the center) and an eccentric position (near the inclined plane) of the dynamic hole in group 1 and group 2, respectively. The mean of undercorrection observed in the two groups was compared using an independent t test. Also, the effect of compression on the gap between the plate and medial tibial cortex, and the osteotomy gap was evaluated using a Sine rule. Besides, the mean undercorrection observed was assessed for clinical significance based on the effect on the weight-bearing axis (WBA) using a Cosine Rule. RESULTS: The mean undercorrection was 1.3 ± 0.6 mm and 2.6 ± 0.6 mm in group 1 and group 2, respectively. A significantly greater undercorrection was observed in group 2 (p < 0.001). The correction loss in group 2 has resulted from combinations of the sliding effect of the dynamic hole and oblique compression effect over the gap between the plate and medial tibial cortex whereas in group 1 it has only resulted from the oblique compression effect. The observed undercorrection in group 2 has resulted in clinically significant WBA shift (10%) over the width of the tibial plateau. CONCLUSIONS: In OWHTO, compression is important for the stability and healing of osteotomy, but it can also cause loss of correction. In patients requiring large correction, the surgeon should control the amount of compression required and consider making extra osteotomy gap to avoid undercorrection. Furthermore, the placement of cortex screws in neutral is essential to lower the risk of undercorrection.
