RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Recalcitrant dermatophytosis is an emerging phenomenon that occurs worldwide, and Trichophyton indotineae is currently the prominent cause. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Skin specimens from patients with tinea infection were obtained by scrubbing and then sectioned into three fragments. Two fragments were subjected to direct microscopic examination and culture, while the third portion was utilized in the PCR method. RESULTS: Isolates were morphologically identified as Trichophyton mentagrophytes/interdigitale complex (n = 60 [83.33%]), Microsporum canis (n = 8 [11.11%]), Trichophyton rubrum (n = 3 [4.16%]), and Epidermophyton floccosum (n = 1 [1.38%]). Among 60 T. mentagrophytes complex isolates, 53 (88.33%) were classified as T. indotineae and seven as T. interdigitale genotype II. The disease duration was longer in the T. indotineae group (P = 0.035). Both Gradient PCR and skin-sampling methods yield similar results in terms of positive and negative cases (P = 1.0000). The time patients stopped their medication did not impact the positive case numbers (P = 0.803). Gender had no effects on the frequency (P = 0.699). Familial contamination, dermatologic disorder, and other underlying conditions did not differ in the two group infections (P > 0.05). Steroid usage is strongly associated with the emergence of tinea infection (P < 0.04). The duration of antifungal administration had a substantial effect on the emergence of resistant organisms (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Steroid usage, T. indotineae involvement, and prolonged exposure to antifungals were the solid and influential factors in recalcitrant involvement. Regarding quick and suitable diagnosis and treatment, which is essential in preventing recalcitrant cases, we suggest that direct skin sample PCR can meet the demands.
RESUMO
Recently, advances in understanding the etiology of urticaria and updates of diagnostic and therapeutic management guidelines have drawn attention to chronic urticaria (CU) morbidity. The present study aimed to evaluate Iranian dermatologists' practice and real life management of CU patients. A total of 35 dermatologists and 443 patients were included in the study. Number of female patients was 321 (72.5%). Mean (standard deviation) age of the study patients was 38 (13) years and the median (inter quartile range) of disease duration was 12 (6-48) months. Severity of patients' symptoms was mild for 32.1%, moderate for 38.7%, severe for 18.8%, and 10.4% of them had no evident signs or symptoms. The most common diagnostic methods were physical examination (96.6%), differential blood count (83.5%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (77.4%), and C-reactive protein (62.8%). The number of dermatologists prescribed nonsedating antihistamines (nsAH) in regular dose and high dose mono therapy were 26 (74%) and 6 (17%), respectively. About 66% of dermatologists were familiar with British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) guideline. The most common first-line treatment for CU by Iranian dermatologists was nonsedating antihistamines in regular or high doses. The real-life management of patients with CU in Iran was in accordance with the available practice guidelines.
