Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(6): 1223-1230, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702908

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this work was to determine racial disparities in access to minimally invasive proctectomy using a national database. METHOD: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program evaluated for surgical approach (robotic, laparoscopic or open), demographics and comorbidity, and then compared by race. RESULTS: A total of 3511 patients (325 Asian, 2925 White, 261 African American/Black) with cancer who underwent a proctectomy between 2016 and 2020 were included. Both Asians and Whites had significantly higher rates of laparoscopic proctectomy relative to African Americans (38.5%, 33.8% and 28.7%, respectively; p = 0.0001). Asians had the highest rate of robotic proctectomy (38.2%, p = 0.0001). Conversely, Black patients had significantly higher rates of open proctectomy followed by Whites and then Asians (42.1%, 35.4% and 23.4%, respectively; p = 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination, African Americans were 0.7 times as likely to undergo laparoscopic proctectomy and 1.4 times more likely to undergo open proctectomy than Whites (p = 0.043). Compared with Whites, Asians were 1.8, 1.7 and 1.9 times more likely to undergo minimally invasive, laparoscopic proctectomy and robotic proctectomy, respectively (p = 0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Asians had the highest rate of laparoscopic and robotic proctectomy, while Blacks had the highest rate of open proctectomy. African Americans were least likely to undergo laparoscopic proctectomy compared with all races. Race is an independent risk factor for access to minimally invasive proctectomy.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Laparoscopia , Protectomia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , População Branca , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/etnologia , Protectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Protectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Bases de Dados Factuais
2.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 36(4): 239-246, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743685

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design. SUMMARY: The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Qualidade de Vida , Doenças Retais , Humanos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Laparoscopia/métodos
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 1, 2023 Dec 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055072

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the incidence and identify risk factors for the occurrence of short-term major posto-perative complications following colorectal resection for endometriosis. METHODS: A cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012-2020. We included patients with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis who underwent colon or rectal resections for endometriosis. RESULTS: Of 755 women who underwent colorectal resection, 495 (65.6%) had laparoscopic surgery and 260 (34.4%) had open surgery. The major complication rate was 13.5% (n = 102). Women who underwent open surgery had a higher proportion of major complications (n = 53, 20.4% vs. n = 49, 9.9%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis, Black race (aOR 95%CI 2.81 (1.60-4.92), p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.42-6.43), p = 0.004), hypertension (aOR 95%CI 1.89 (1.08-3.30), p = 0.025), laparotomy (aOR 95%CI 1.64 (1.03-3.30), p = 0.025), concomitant enterotomy (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.26-7.21), p = 0.013), and hysterectomy (aOR 95%CI 2.59 (1.62-4.15), p < 0.001) were independently associated with major post-operative complications. In a subanalysis of laparoscopies only, Hispanic ethnicity, chronic hypertension, lysis of bowel adhesions, and hysterectomy were independently associated with major complications. In a subanalysis of laparotomies only, Black race and hysterectomy were independently positively associated with the occurrence of major complications. CONCLUSION: This study provides a current population-based estimate of short-term complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis in the USA. The identified risk factors for complications can assist during preoperative shared decision-making and informed consent process.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Endometriose , Hipertensão , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Risco
4.
Am J Surg ; 218(6): 1239-1243, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31399196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is little consensus with regards to the most appropriate surgical management for low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinomas (LAMA), though right hemicolectomy is usually recommended. METHODS: The SEER database was queried for all patients with non-metastatic LAMA. Disease specific and overall survival was compared by surgery type: 1) appendectomy, 2) formal right hemicolectomy 3) non-formal colectomy (including ileocecectomy). RESULTS: A total of 579 patients with non-metastatic LAMA were identified. 133 (23%), 404 (70%), and 42 (7%) of patients had stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. 99 (17.1%) had appendectomy, 87 (15%) had non-formal colectomy, and 302 (52.2%) had formal right hemicolectomy. We observed no significant differences in disease specific or overall survival by surgery type. Controlling for age and stage, surgery type was not a significant predictor of disease specific or overall survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with localized LAMA, right hemicolectomy did not increase disease specific or overall survival. Right hemicolectomy should be reserved for LAMA patients with positive margins post appendectomy.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Apêndice/cirurgia , Colectomia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Apendicectomia , Neoplasias do Apêndice/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Seleção de Pacientes , Programa de SEER , Taxa de Sobrevida
5.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 42(4): 801-13, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24280401

RESUMO

Pruritus ani is a common condition with multiple causes. Primary causes are thought to be fecal soiling or food irritants. Secondary causes include malignancy, infections including sexually transmitted diseases, benign anorectal diseases, systemic diseases, and inflammatory conditions. A broad differential diagnosis must be considered. A reassessment of the diagnosis is required if symptoms or findings are not responsive to therapy. The pathophysiology of itching, an overview of primary and secondary causes, and various treatment options are reviewed.


Assuntos
Prurido Anal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ânus/complicações , Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico , Candidíase/complicações , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Carcinoma in Situ/complicações , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Seborreica/complicações , Dermatite Seborreica/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/complicações , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Humanos , Líquen Plano/complicações , Líquen Plano/diagnóstico , Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/complicações , Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/diagnóstico , Doença de Paget Extramamária/complicações , Doença de Paget Extramamária/diagnóstico , Prurido Anal/etiologia , Prurido Anal/terapia , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Uremia/complicações , Uremia/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...