Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 138(6): 634-637, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305030

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of cartilage interposition ossiculoplasty was assessed in cases of incus necrosis after posterior malleus repositioning in the plane of the stapes, in terms of hearing gain after ossicular reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted of 30 patients admitted to an Ain Shams University hospital from March 2021 to September 2021. All patients with ossicular disruption due to chronic suppurative otitis media and hearing loss of more than 40 dB were included in the study. Pure tone audiometry was conducted for each patient after three months, six months and one year post operation. RESULTS: The audiogram showed a post-operative air-bone gap of 20 dB or less in 83.33 per cent of patients (n = 25) at three months post-operatively and in 80 per cent of patients after six months; after one year, the results remained the same. CONCLUSION: The use of cartilage interposition after malleus posterior mobilisation represents an excellent partial ossicular replacement technique.


Assuntos
Bigorna , Martelo , Necrose , Substituição Ossicular , Humanos , Martelo/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bigorna/cirurgia , Bigorna/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Substituição Ossicular/métodos , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Resultado do Tratamento , Otite Média Supurativa/cirurgia , Otite Média Supurativa/complicações , Estribo/patologia , Adulto Jovem , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Perda Auditiva/cirurgia , Cirurgia do Estribo/métodos , Cirurgia do Estribo/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Cartilagem/transplante
2.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 28(1): e107-e114, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38322445

RESUMO

Introduction Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW Objective to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. Methods This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion Results There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Four cases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7(14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). Conclusion Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach.

3.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 28(1): 107-114, 2024. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1557999

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW Objective to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. Methods This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion Results There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Fourcases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7 (14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). Conclusion Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach,

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...