Choroid plexus volume in multiple sclerosis can be estimated on structural MRI avoiding contrast injection.

We compared choroid plexus (ChP) manual segmentation on non-contrast-enhanced (non-CE) sequences and reference standard CE T1- weighted (T1w) sequences in 61 multiple sclerosis patients prospectively included. ChP was separately segmented on T1w, T2-weighted (T2w) fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR), and CE-T1w sequences. Inter-rater variability assessed on 10 subjects showed high reproducibility between sequences measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (T1w 0.93, FLAIR 0.93, CE-T1w 0.99). CE-T1w showed higher signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CE-T1w 23.77 and 18.49, T1w 13.73 and 7.44, FLAIR 13.09 and 10.77, respectively). Manual segmentation of ChP resulted 3.073 ± 0.563 mL (mean ± standard deviation) on T1w, 3.787 ± 0.679 mL on FLAIR, and 2.984 ± 0.506 mL on CE-T1w images, with an error of 28.02 ± 19.02% for FLAIR and 3.52 ± 12.61% for T1w. FLAIR overestimated ChP volume compared to CE-T1w (p < 0.001). The Dice similarity coefficient of CE-T1w versus T1w and FLAIR was 0.67 ± 0.05 and 0.68 ± 0.05, respectively. Spatial error distribution per slice was calculated after nonlinear coregistration to the standard MNI152 space and showed a heterogeneous profile along the ChP especially near the fornix and the hippocampus. Quantitative analyses suggest T1w as a surrogate of CE-T1w to estimate ChP volume.Relevance statement To estimate the ChP volume, CE-T1w can be replaced by non-CE T1w sequences because the error is acceptable, while FLAIR overestimates the ChP volume. This encourages the development of automatic tools for ChP segmentation, also improving the understanding of the role of the ChP volume in multiple sclerosis, promoting longitudinal studies.Key points • CE-T1w sequences are considered the reference standard for ChP manual segmentation.• FLAIR sequences showed a higher CNR than T1w sequences but overestimated the ChP volume.• Non-CE T1w sequences can be a surrogate of CE-T1w sequences for manual segmentation of ChP.

Insights into single-timepoint ASL hemodynamics: what visual assessment and spatial coefficient of variation can tell.

PURPOSE: Arterial spin labeling (ASL) represents a noninvasive perfusion biomarker, and, in the study of nonvascular disease, the use of the single-timepoint ASL technique is recommended. However, the obtained cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps may be highly influenced by delayed arterial transit time (ATT). Our aim was to assess the complexity of hemodynamic information of single-timepoint CBF maps using a new visual scale and comparing it with an ATT proxy, the "coefficient of spatial variation" (sCoV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Individual CBF maps were estimated in a memory clinic population (mild cognitive impairment, dementia and cognitively unimpaired controls) and classified into four levels of delayed perfusion based on a visual rating scale. Calculated measures included global/regional sCoVs and common CBF statistics, as mean, median and standard deviation. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare these measures across the four groups of delayed perfusion. Spearman correlation was used to study the association of global sCoV with clinical data and CBF statistics. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four participants (72 ± 7 years, 53% women) were included in the study. The proportion of maps with none, mild, moderate, and severe delayed perfusion was 15, 20, 37, and 28%, respectively. SCoV demonstrated a significant increase (p < 0.05) across the four groups, except when comparing none vs mild delayed perfusion groups (pBonf > 0.05). Global sCoV values, as an ATT proxy, ranged from 67 ± 4% (none) to 121 ± 24% (severe delayed) and were significantly associated with age and CBF statistics (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The impact of ATT delay in single-time CBF maps requires the use of a visual scale or sCoV in clinical or research settings.