Does teaching Optimism lower Burnout in residency training- a pilot study.

Background: Residents frequently experience burnout. Multiple interventions to decrease the risk of burnout have had inconsistent results. In non-medical settings, improving optimism promotes a positive outlook and enhances well-being. Thus, psychological interventions that improve optimism could have potential to decrease the risk for burnout. Objective: Using Lazarus' Ways of Coping as an organizational framework, this intervention sought to evaluate the impact of an optimism curriculum on residents' burnout. Methods: Thirty-six Internal Medicine residents participated in an optimism improvement program from November 2019 to April 2020. We determined pre- and post-curriculum measures of optimism, happiness, and burnout with validated surveys. The Optimism Curriculum was comprised of three one-hour long sessions, which included lectures, group and self-reflective exercises. A post - curriculum evaluation rating the effectiveness of the program was administered separately. Results: Thirty-four out of thirty-six residents completed the post curricular surveys. Individuals with low optimism scores had a higher score for burnout compared to those with higher optimism scores. The post-intervention survey showed numerical improvement in optimism, happiness and burnout, although these changes were not statistically significant. The post-intervention survey showed a decrease in the measure of burnout; however, this was not significant (p = 0.24) with an effect size of 0.34 (Cohen's d). Conclusions: Teaching optimism to residents with the objective of decreasing the risk of burnout is feasible and easily integrated into residency education sessions. The encouraging results of this pilot study lay the foundation for additional studies and suggest a practical role for implementing optimism curricula in residency training programs.

New-onset cutaneous lupus erythematosus after the COVID-19 vaccine.

Vaccine development for COVID-19 has progressed expeditiously. To date, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the Moderna/mRNA-1273, Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), and Johnson & Johnson's Janssen (JNJ-78436735) vaccines for use in the United States. Immediate side effects have included myalgia fatigue, chills, fever, and headache. We report an elderly patient with a history of lung cancer and no prior history of autoimmune disease who developed cutaneous lupus erythematosus two ½ months after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Code S: Redesigning Hospital-Wide Peer Review Processes to Identify System Errors.

Hospital medical errors that result in patient harm and death are largely identified as system failures. Most hospitals lack the tools to effectively identify most system errors. Traditional methods used in many hospitals, such as incident reporting (IR), departmental morbidity and mortality conferences, and root cause analysis committees, are often flawed by under reporting. We introduced the Code S designation into our hospital's ongoing physician peer review process as an additional and innovative way to identify system errors that contributed to adverse clinical outcomes. The authors conducted a retrospective review of all peer review cases from January 2008 to December 2011 and determined the quantity and type of system errors that occurred. System errors were categorized based on a modified 5M model which was adapted to reflect system errors encountered in healthcare. The Code S designation discovered 204 system errors that otherwise may not have previously been identified. The addition of the Code S designation to the peer review process can be readily adopted by other healthcare organizations as another tool to help identify, quantify and categorize system errors, and promote hospital-wide process improvements to decrease errors and improve patient safety.