Treatment Beliefs of Children and Adolescents With Chronic Diseases: Development of the Rehabilitation Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation is an important component in the health care of children and adolescents with chronic diseases and aims at supporting patients' self-regulation for dealing with the disease. Patients' beliefs about illness and treatment are core elements in the self-regulation process. While questionnaires measuring illness beliefs for children and adolescents exist, questionnaires about their rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs are lacking. We therefore developed a questionnaire to assess the rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs of children and adolescents with chronic diseases (Rehabilitation Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire, RTBQ) and tested its psychometric properties. METHODS: Ahead of their rehabilitation, children and adolescents, aged 12-17 years, answered 129 items, which were developed based on previous qualitative findings exploring children and adolescents' rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs. Psychometric testing included item analyses, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and bivariate correlations of the extracted scales, and the discriminatory power and difficulty of the final items. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 170 participants with a mean age of 14.3 years (SD = 1.6); 53.5% were female. After item analyses, 47 items remained for the exploratory factor analysis which revealed 22 items allocated to 4 scales: "expectations of communication and interaction," "expectations of the treatment process," "expectations of treatment success and sustainability," and "expectations of one's own role in the rehabilitation process." The psychometric properties were acceptable to good. CONCLUSIONS: The RTBQ assesses various dimensions of rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs of children and adolescents with chronic diseases. While first psychometric results are promising, further psychometric testing is needed.

Psychometric properties of the rehabilitation treatment beliefs questionnaire for psychosomatic rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Treatment beliefs play a crucial role for patient satisfaction and the treatment outcome in psychosomatic rehabilitation. The aim of this study was the development and the psychometric evaluation of an indication-specific questionnaire of beliefs about psychosomatic rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic. The primary item list comprised k = 125 items. After a descriptive item analysis, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. Furthermore, we tested reliability via McDonald's Omega and construct validity by analyzing correlations of the scales with related constructs. RESULTS: Of the N = 264 participants, 50% were female and the mean age was 50.4 (SD = 9.8) years. K = 85 items were suitable for factor analysis, which resulted in k = 30 items constituting six scales, explaining of 57% the overall variance. The corrected item-total correlations were between r = 0.48 and r = 0.83. Internal consistency ranged from ω = 0.81 to ω = 0.86. CONCLUSION: The newly developed questionnaire assesses specific treatment beliefs about inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation. The psychometric properties of the six scales are acceptable. Further studies should confirm the psychometric results, such as the factorial structure of the questionnaire.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONTreatment beliefs are known to play an important role for the adherence, therapy outcome and satisfaction in psychosomatic rehabilitation.We developed and tested a indication-specific questionnaire assessing treatment beliefs in psychosomatic rehabilitation.The questionnaire can be used to explore patient's rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs, predict treatment outcomes, and to develop interventions attempting to modify these.

Illness and treatment beliefs as predictors of rehabilitation outcome in patients with mental disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Illness and treatment beliefs are important predictors of health outcomes. However, little is known about their impact on outcomes in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of illness and rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs in patients with mental disorders attending psychosomatic rehabilitation. METHODS: We applied a longitudinal study with two measurement points (before rehabilitation; end of rehabilitation) in a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic. Patients with mood disorders, anxiety or fear-related disorders, stress associated disorders or bodily distress disorders were included. Using regression models, we analysed whether illness and rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs predicted the rehabilitation outcome (operationalised through "Health-49"). Illness beliefs were assessed using the IPQ-R, while treatment beliefs were assessed using the RTBQ-Psych. Analyses were conducted separately for patients with a F3 and F4 diagnosis in accordance with the ICD-10. RESULTS: N = 239 patients were included, sample size per regression model ranged between n = 48 and n = 85. Mean age was 50.8 years, and n = 120 were female. Initial symptom burden was the strongest predictor in all models with 12% to 64% explained variance. Concerning illness beliefs, perceived consequences, treatment control, and cyclic timeline were negatively linked to the outcome, whereas coherence and emotional representations were shown to be positive predictors. Regarding treatment beliefs, expectations towards treatment results were positively and concerns were negatively associated predictors. CONCLUSION: Illness and treatment beliefs are predictors of the rehabilitation outcome. Patients´ beliefs might therefore be good starting points for interventions in the context of rehabilitation.

Cognitive impairment and quality of life of people with epilepsy and neurocysticercosis in Zambia.

Cognitive impairment and quality of life (Qol) are important to assess the burden of epilepsy and neurocysticercosis (NCC), which are common but neglected in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The aims of this study were to assess cognitive performance and Qol of people with epilepsy (PWE) in Zambia and to explore differences in PWE with and without NCC. In this community based, cross-sectional case-control-study, 47 PWE and 50 healthy controls completed five neuropsychological tests (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Digit Span, Selective Reminding Test (SRT), Spatial Recall Test (SPART), Test Battery of Attentional Performance (TAP)) and a World Health Organization (WHO) questionnaire of Qol. Comparisons were made between PWE (n=47) and healthy controls (n=50) and between PWE with NCC (n=28) and without NCC (n=19), respectively, using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Linear Models (LMs) while correcting for confounders such as age, sex, and schooling years, and adjusting for multiplicity. Working memory, spatial memory, verbal memory, verbal learning, orientation, speech and language reception, visuoconstructive ability, and attentional performance were significantly reduced in PWE compared with healthy controls (ANCOVA and LM, p<0.05). Quality of life of PWE was significantly lower in three domains (psychological, social, environmental) and in overall Qol compared with healthy controls (ANCOVA, p<0.05). There were no significant differences between PWE with NCC and PWE without NCC detected by ANCOVA. Using LM, significant differences between the groups were detected in four tests, indicating worse performance of PWE without NCC in MMSE, Digit Span, SPART, and lower physical Qol. Epilepsy was found to be associated with cognitive impairment and reduced Qol. People with epilepsy due to NCC had similar cognitive impairment and Qol compared with PWE due to other causes. Further studies should investigate the role of different conditions of NCC and the role of seizures on cognition and Qol.

Population compliance with national dietary recommendations and its determinants: findings from the ORISCAV-LUX study.

The objective of the present study was to determine the proportion of adults meeting national recommendations for food and nutrient intake and to identify the demographic, socio-economic and behavioural factors that may contribute to weaken dietary compliance. ORISCAV-LUX is a cross-sectional study that took place in Luxembourg (2007-8). A representative stratified random sample of 1352 adults aged 18-69 years participated in the nationwide cardiovascular health survey. A FFQ was used to estimate food intake. Radar charts were built to compare graphically the compliance of the participants with different key dietary guidelines on the same set of axes. The thirteen food- and nutrient-based recommendations were scored and summed to create a recommendation compliance index (range -0·5 to 14). Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors contributing to poor dietary compliance. Several food- and nutrient-based guidelines were insufficiently respected compared with others. The greatest gaps occurred in the adherence to grain and dairy product consumption guidelines, as well as to total fat and notably to SFA recommendations. Age, country of birth, economic status, smoking status and subject's awareness of the importance of balanced meals emerged as independently associated with weak dietary compliance. Obese subjects conformed more to dietary recommendations compared with normal-weight subjects. The findings underscore the need for specific nutrition education messages along with targeted interventions. Efforts should be continued to increase population awareness of the importance of a healthy lifestyle and a balanced diet.