The role of central mu opioid receptors in opioid-induced itch in primates.

Pruritus (itch sensation) is a significant clinical problem. The aim of this study was to elucidate the roles of opioid receptor types and the site of action in opioid-induced itch in monkeys. Observers who were blinded to the conditions counted scratching after administration of various drugs. Intravenous (i.v.) administration of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists (fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil, and morphine) evoked scratching in a dose- and time-dependent manner. However, the kappa opioid agonist U-50488H [trans-(+/-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide] and delta opioid agonist SNC80 [(+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-[2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl]-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] did not increase scratching. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of peptidic MOR agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO, 0.00032-0.01 mg) evoked scratching, but i.v. DAMGO (0.01-1 mg/kg) did not increase scratching. A similar difference between i.t. and i.v. effectiveness was seen with morphine. Antagonist studies revealed that i.v. administration of an opioid receptor antagonist (naltrexone, 0.0032-0.1 mg/kg) dose dependently attenuated scratching induced by i.v. fentanyl (0.018 mg/kg) or morphine (1 mg/kg). However, a peripherally selective opioid antagonist (quaternary naltrexone, 0.0032-0.32 mg/kg) did not block i.v. fentanyl- or morphine-induced scratching. Moreover, a histamine antagonist (diphenhydramine, 0.1-10 mg/kg), failed to attenuate scratching induced by i.t. morphine (0.032 mg) or i.v. morphine (1 mg/kg). Pretreatment with a selective MOR antagonist (clocinnamox, 0.1 mg/kg), but not kappa or delta opioid antagonists (nor-binaltorphimine or naltrindole), blocked i.t. morphine-induced scratching. Together, these data suggest that MOR, not other opioid receptor types or histamine, mediates scratching evoked by opioid analgesics. More important, this study provides in vivo pharmacological evidence that activation of central MOR plays an important role in opioid-induced itch in primates.

Characterization of scratching responses in rats following centrally administered morphine or bombesin.

The aim of this study was to characterize scratching behavior elicited by central administration of morphine or bombesin in rats, and to determine the role of opioid receptors in scratching induced by both pruritogenic agents. Central administration included intracisternal (i.c.), intrathecal (i.t.), and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) routes. Scratching events made with hind paws were counted by observers blinded to treatment conditions. Intracisternal morphine (0.01-0.1 microg) produced dose-dependent increases in scratching; the maximum response to i.c. morphine 0.1 microg was approximately 500 scratches within a 1-hour period. Neither i.t. nor i.c.v. morphine significantly increased scratching. Bombesin (0.01-0.32 microg) elicited robust scratching following i.c. administration. The maximum response to i.c. bombesin 0.32 microg was approximately 4000 scratches within a 1-hour period. Both i.t. and i.c.v. bombesin produced profound scratching at similar doses. Antagonist studies confirmed that mu-opioid receptors selectively mediate i.c. morphine-induced scratching. However, selective mu-, kappa-, and delta-opioid antagonists did not attenuate i.c. bombesin-induced scratching. These results demonstrate that morphine and bombesin elicit scratching through different receptor mechanisms, at different central sites, and to different degrees.

Studies of micro-, kappa-, and delta-opioid receptor density and G protein activation in the cortex and thalamus of monkeys.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relative density of micro -, kappa-, and delta-opioid receptors (MOR, KOR, and DOR) and guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding stimulated by full agonists in cortical and thalamic membranes of monkeys. The binding parameters [Bmax (femtomoles per milligram)/Kd (nanomolar)] were as follows: [3H][d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) (MOR; 80/0.7), [3H]U69593 [(5alpha,7alpha,8beta)-(-)-N-methyl-N-(7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro(4,5)dec-8-yl) benzeneacetamide] (KOR; 116/1.3), and [3H][d-Pen2,d-Pen5]-enkephalin (DPDPE) (DOR; 87/1.3) in the cortex; [3H]DAMGO (147/0.9), [3H]U69593 (75/2.5), and [3H]DPDPE (22/2.0) in the thalamus. The relative proportions of MOR, KOR, and DOR in the cortex were 28, 41, and 31% and in the thalamus were 60, 31, and 9%. Full selective opioid agonists, DAMGO (EC50 = 532-565 nM) and U69593 (EC50 = 80-109 nM) stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes of cortex and thalamus, whereas SNC80 [(+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethyl-benzamide] (DOR; EC50 = 68 nM) was only active in cortical membranes. The magnitudes of [35S]GTPgammaS binding stimulated by these agonists were similar in the cortex, ranging from 17 to 25% over basal binding. In the thalamus, DAMGO and U69593 increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding by 44 and 23% over basal, respectively. Opioid agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding was blocked selectively by antagonists for MOR, KOR, and DOR. The amount of G protein activated by agonists was highly proportional to the relative receptor densities in both regions. These results distinguish the ability of opioid agonists to activate G proteins and provide a functional correlate of ligand-binding experiments in the monkey brain. In particular, the relative densities of opioid receptor binding sites in the two brain areas reflect their functional roles in the pharmacological actions of opioids in the central nervous system of primates.

Orphanin FQ inhibits capsaicin-induced thermal nociception in monkeys by activation of peripheral ORL1 receptors.

1. Orphanin FQ (OFQ), an endogenous peptide for ORL1 receptors, has been identified. Although the actions of OFQ have much in common with those of opioid peptides at the cellular level, behavioral studies in rodents seem conflicting. 2. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential pronociceptive or antinociceptive function of peripheral ORL1 receptors in primates. Experiments were conducted to verify whether local administration of OFQ can attenuate capsaicin-induced nociception and whether peripheral ORL1 receptors selectively mediate the local action of OFQ in monkeys. 3. Capsaicin (100 microg) was administered subcutaneously in the tail to locally evoke a nociceptive response (thermal allodynia/hyperalgesia), which was manifested as a reduced tail-withdrawal latency in normally innocuous 46 degreeC warm water. 4. Co-administration of OFQ (1--30 microg) with capsaicin in the tail dose-dependently inhibited thermal nociception. However, a locally effective dose of OFQ (30 microg), when applied in the back, did not inhibit capsaicin-induced nociception. 5. OFQ-induced local antinociception was antagonized by a small dose (10 microg) of J-113397, a selective ORL1 receptor antagonist, in the tail. Similarly, s.c. administration of 10 microg of J-113397 in the back did not antagonize local antinociception of OFQ. 6. In addition, s.c. administration of either OFQ or J-113397 in the tail alone did not change its thermal nociceptive threshold. Local administration of opioid receptor antagonists selective for mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptors did not antagonize OFQ-induced local antinociception. Local administration of J-113397 also did not interfere with the local actions of mu, kappa, and delta opioid agonists in the tail. 7. These results provide the first functional evidence that activation of peripheral ORL1 receptors produces thermal antinociception in primates and this action is independent of antinociception produced at classical opioid receptors.

Potency and sterility of anesthetic drugs in obstetric anesthesia.

In order to estimate how long a medication can remain prepared before the integrity or concentration of the drug is compromised, we assessed the sterility and potency of medications commonly used in our obstetric anesthesia practice. Our goal was to evaluate the following drugs over a 30-day period: epinephrine, atropine, lidocaine, succinylcholine, and ephedrine. The medications were prepared by various medical staff, drawn into sterile plastic syringes and left at room temperature unprotected from light for the duration of the study. The syringes were collected daily, stored and randomly sampled after 7, 14, 21 and 30 days by research personnel. Potency and sterility of atropine, ephedrine and lidocaine were maintained over the study period. Succinylcholine and epinephrine could not be assayed but the solutions remained sterile for 30 and 14 days respectively. Data were incomplete for epinephrine. These findings suggest that some drugs that are commonly used in obstetric anesthesia are stable for long periods of time. Modification of current standards of practice could result in a significant reduction in drug waste and therefore cost.

Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research: factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate.

UNLABELLED: Patients who are approached to participate in clinical studies just before delivery may have insufficient time to make an informed decision and/or may feel pressured into participation. This study was designed to examine factors that influence parturients to consent or decline participation in an anesthesia study related to their delivery. Parturients who had been approached to participate in a continuing clinical obstetric anesthesia study were subsequently given a questionnaire that documented their reasons for consenting or declining participation. There were no demographic differences among the consenters (n = 166) and nonconsenters (n = 109). The most important factors in the patient's decision to consent were related to their understanding and perceived importance of the study and the potential benefit to other women. Forty-one (40. 6%) nonconsenters strongly considered their pain/discomfort a factor in declining participation. Only one patient felt some pressure to consent, suggesting that the overall environment was noncoercive. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients who read the consent form completely, those who had participated in a previous research study, and those who were less anxious about participating were more likely to consent. IMPLICATIONS: Obtaining informed consent for obstetric anesthesia studies presents a challenge to the anesthesiologist. Results from this study suggest that the environment in which consent for obstetric studies is sought is not coercive. However, it is important that the anesthesiologist ensures that the patient fully understands the study and develops a rapport with the patient to allay any anxiety associated with her participation as a potential research subject.

Effect of intravenous versus epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural bupivacaine in labor.

BACKGROUND: The minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) has been defined as the median effective local analgesic concentration (EC50) in a 20-ml volume for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. The aim of this study was to determine the relative local anesthetic sparing efficacies of intravenous and epidural fentanyl by comparison of their effects on the MLAC of bupivacaine. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, prospective study, 84 parturients at < or = 7-cm cervical dilation who requested epidural analgesia were allocated to one of two groups. After lumbar epidural catheter placement, 20 ml bupivacaine (n = 44) or bupivacaine with 3 microg/ml (60 microg) fentanyl (n = 40) was administered. The plain bupivacaine group then received 60 microg intravenous fentanyl. The bupivacaine-fentanyl group received intravenous saline. The concentration of bupivacaine was determined by the response of the previous patient in that group to a higher or lower concentration using up-down sequential allocation. Analgesic efficacy was assessed using 100-mm visual analog pain scores, with < or = 10 mm within 30 min define as effective. RESULTS: The MLAC of bupivacaine-intravenous fentanyl was 0.064% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.049-0.080), and the MLAC of bupivacaine-epidural fentanyl was 0.034% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.017-0.050). Epidural fentanyl significantly increased the analgesic potency of bupivacaine by a factor of 1.88 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.67) compared with intravenous fentanyl. The epidural fentanyl group demonstrated significantly higher dermatomal spread (P = 0.0064) and increased pruritus (P = 0. 01). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural fentanyl significantly reduced the MLAC of bupivacaine when compared with intravenous fentanyl for the parturients in this study. The significantly enhanced local anesthetic sparing, dermatomal level, and pruritus with epidural fentanyl suggest a primarily spinal site of action.

An experimental itch model in monkeys: characterization of intrathecal morphine-induced scratching and antinociception.

BACKGROUND: The most common side effect of spinal opioid administration is pruritus, which has been treated with a variety of agents with variable success. Currently, there are few animal models developed to study this side effect. The aim of this study was to establish a nonhuman primate model to pharmacologically characterize the effects of intrathecal administration of morphine. METHODS: Eight adult rhesus monkeys were used. Scratching responses were videotaped and counted by observers who were blinded to experimental conditions. Antinociception was measured by a warm-water (50 degrees C) tail-withdrawal assay. The dose-response of intrathecal morphine (1-320 microg) for both scratching and antinociception in all subjects was established. An opioid antagonist, nalmefene, was administered either intravenously or subcutaneously to assess its efficacy against intrathecal morphine. RESULTS: Intrathecal morphine (1-32 microg) increased scratching in a dose-dependent manner. Higher doses of intrathecal morphine (10-100 microg) produced thermal antinociception in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, nalmefene (10-32 microg/kg intravenously) attenuated maximum scratching responses among subjects. Pretreatment with nalmefene (32 microg/kg subcutaneously) produced approximately 10-fold rightward shifts of intrathecal morphine dose-response curves for both behavioral effects. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that intrathecal morphine-induced scratching and antinociception are mediated by opioid receptors. The magnitude of nalmefene antagonism of intrathecal morphine is consistent with microL opioid receptor mediation. This experimental itch model is useful for evaluating different agents that may suppress scratching without interfering with antinociception. It may also facilitate the clarification of mechanisms underlying these phenomena.

The effects of the phyllolitorin analogue [desTrp(3), Leu(8)]phyllolitorin on scratching induced by bombesin and related peptides in rats.

Bombesin along with several closely related neuropeptides elicit scratching behavior when administered centrally. The first part of the study was designed to determine the antagonistic effects of a novel phyllolitorin analogue [desTrp(3),Leu(8)]phyllolitorin (DTP) on scratching induced by three peptides (bombesin, neuromedin-C, and [Leu(8)]phyllolitorin). In addition, the binding affinity of each peptide for the bombesin receptor site was determined. DTP (30 microg) inhibited scratching induced by these peptides, but unlike the peptides, DTP had no affinity for the bombesin site, thereby suggesting that DTP is displaying physiological antagonism through an unknown mechanism.

Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes.

BACKGROUND: The minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) has been defined as the median effective local analgesic concentration in a 20-ml volume for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. The aim of this study was to assess the relative analgesic potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine by determining their respective minimum local analgesic concentrations. METHODS: Seventy-three parturients at < or = 7 cm cervical dilation who requested epidural analgesia were allocated to one of two groups in this double-blinded, randomized, prospective study. After a lumbar epidural catheter was placed, 20 ml of the test solution was given, either ropivacaine (n = 34) or bupivacaine (n = 39). The concentration of local anesthetic was determined by the response of the previous patient in that group to a higher or lower concentration using up-down sequential allocation. Analgesic efficacy was assessed using 100-mm visual analog pain scores with < or = 10 mm within 30 min defined as effective. An effective result directed a 0.01% wt/vol decrement for the next patient. An ineffective result directed a 0.01% wt/vol increment. RESULTS: The minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine was 0.111% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.100-0.122), and the minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine was 0.067% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.052-0.082). Ropivacaine was significantly less potent than bupivacaine, with a potency ratio of 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.74). No difference in motor effects was observed. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine was significantly less potent than bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor.

Dose-dependent reduction of the minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine by sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labor.

BACKGROUND: The minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) has been defined as the median effective local analgesic concentration in a 20-ml volume for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. The aim of this study was to determine the local anesthetic-sparing efficacy of epidural sufentanil by its effect on the MLAC of bupivacaine. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, prospective study, 147 parturients at < or = 7 cm cervical dilation who requested epidural analgesia were allocated to one of four study groups. After a lumbar epidural catheter was placed, study participants received 20 ml bupivacaine (n = 38), bupivacaine with sufentanil 0.5 microg/ml (n = 38), bupivacaine with sufentanil 1 microg/ml (n = 33), or bupivacaine with sufentanil 1.5 microg/ml (n = 38). The concentration of bupivacaine was determined by the response of the previous patient using up-down sequential allocation. The analgesic efficacy was assessed using 100-mm visual analog pain scores, with < or = 10 mm within 30 min defined as effective. RESULTS: The MLAC of bupivacaine alone was 0.104% wt/vol (95% CI, 0.090-0.117). The addition of sufentanil at doses of 0.5 microg/ml, 1 microg/ml, and 1.5 microg/ml resulted in significant reductions (P < 0.0001) in the MLAC of bupivacaine to 0.048% wt/vol (95% CI, 0.030- 0.065), 0.021% wt/vol (95% CI, 0-0.055), and 0.009% wt/vol (95% CI, 0-0.023), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significant (P < 0.0001) dose-dependent reduction in the MLAC ofbupivacaine by sufentanil.

Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural chloroprocaine hydrochloride in labor.

The aim was to determine the effective concentration in 50% of patients (EC(50)) of chloroprocaine in the first stage of labor. A constant dose modification of a model where EC(50) was previously defined as the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) was used. Parturients (n = 36) requesting epidural analgesia in labor, at cervical dilatation not exceeding 7 cm, were enrolled into this prospective, double-blinded study. After placing a lumbar epidural catheter, chloroprocaine 150 mg diluted to the concentration being evaluated was given. The concentration was determined by up-down sequential allocation. The volume of the bolus ranged from 15 to 50 ml. Efficacy was assessed using 100 mm visual analogue pain scores with 10 mm or less within 30 min defined as effective. MLAC (95%CI) was 0.42%w/v (0.34 to 0.5) using the formula of Dixon & Massey and as a sensitivity test was 0.4%w/v (0.35 to 0.46) using probit regression analysis. In conclusion, MLAC of chloroprocaine was 0.42%w/v in these parturients, equivalent to 14 millimolar solution. This study confirmed that concentration rather than dose could be used as a measure of efficacy in this constant dose model.