The posterior auricular muscle complex graft as a porous orbital implant wrap: long-term follow-up over a 31-year period.

PURPOSE: Orbital implant exposures, infections, and extrusions can occur many years following enucleation or evisceration. This study analyzes complication rates following porous orbital implant wrapped with a posterior auricular muscle complex graft (PAMCG). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent orbital implantation following enucleation using this technique between 1992 and 2013. Only cases with a minimum of 18 months of follow-up were included. No patients underwent peg implantation. Patient's demographics, follow-up time, type of implant, complications including wound dehiscence, exposure, postoperative infection, and extrusion were recorded. RESULTS: This study included 36 orbits of 36 patients with a mean age of 39.3 ± 23.2 years (range, 3-84 years). Thirty patients had hydroxyapatite implants and six had porous polyethylene. The average follow-up time was 12.6 ± 5.6 years (range, 1.5-31.0 years). There were no implant extrusions, and only one exposure resulting in orbital infection that necessitated implant removal (2.8%). CONCLUSION: Wrapping porous orbital implants with PAMCG had favorable long-term outcomes over a thirty-one-year period.

Variation of the minimally invasive CDCR technique.

Purpose: Traditional (tCDCR) and endoscopic conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (eCDCR) are challenging surgical techniques requiring general anesthesia, a facial incision, and a large osteotomy and mucosal flap. Minimally invasive CDCR (miCDCR) techniques eliminate the need for some of the steps in t/eCDCR. Introduced here is a variation of the miCDCR technique using a Naugle-Fleming knurled dilator (NKD) to create the osteotomy and instruments within a central line catheter kit to help easily place or replace a Jones' tube into position within a bony conduit.Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective chart review examined all patients who underwent this miCDCR technique performed by two oculoplastic surgeons at Hamilton Eye Institute at the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center from 2014 to 2016. Inclusion criteria: need for CDCR (either primary or repeat). Exclusion criteria: loss to follow up prior to six months. Primary endpoints: operative time, incidence of tube migration and complications, and cessation of epiphora.Results: Sixteen patients (nine men, seven women) were reviewed, with three undergoing bilateral procedure, totaling 19 cases. Age range: 47.0 to 84.0 years, average of 66.6 years (SD = 11.1). Ten patients had surgery under local/MAC augmented with IV sedation, and six had general anesthesia (38%). Average operative time was 17.4 min (SD = 10.9). One patient (5%) required revision in the six-month immediate post-operative period because of tube migration. All patients had cessation of epiphora.Conclusions: This procedure can be done safely and quickly without general anesthesia, resulting in a satisfactorily lower rate of tube migration and cessation of epiphora rates.

The Latino Eyelid: Anthropometric Analysis of a Spectrum of Findings.

PURPOSE: Published anthropometric measurements of the Latino eyelid are limited. This study describes features spanning the morphologic range from non-Latino whites to East Asians in the spectrum of the Latino eyelid. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 68 people (32 Latinos, 18 non-Latino whites, and 18 East Asians, ages 18-39), approved by the Institutional Review Board and HIPAA-compliant, was performed. Saliva samples determined genetic components. Indirect anthropometric measurements were performed with ImageJ software. Eyelid measurements included margin reflex distance, palpebral fissure height, eyelid crease height, orbital height, horizontal fissure length, inner and outer canthal distances, medial and lateral canthal angles, and lateral canthal angle of inclination. Additionally, exophthalmometry and epicanthal folds were recorded. RESULTS: Analysis of 184 markers from HumanExome Chip data revealed distinct clustering patterns. Genetically, the Asian participants were in 1 group, the whites in another group, and the Latinos spanned the spectrum between these 2 groups. In Latinos, the inner canthal distance and lateral canthal angle of inclination were similar to Asians, whereas the eyelid crease spanned the range from Asians to whites. Half of the Latinos had epicanthal folds. CONCLUSIONS: Latinos possess a spectrum of eyelid features spanning the morphologic characteristics from those of non-Latino whites to those of East Asians. These normative data on Latinos from Texas and Mexico aid in the diagnoses of Latino eyelid disorders and are a reference for optimizing oculofacial surgery outcomes.