Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Implement Sci ; 19(1): 45, 2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956637

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laboratory test overuse in hospitals is a form of healthcare waste that also harms patients. Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce this form of healthcare waste is critical. We detail the protocol for our study which aims to implement and evaluate the impact of an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention bundle on repetitive use of routine laboratory testing in hospitalized medical patients across adult hospitals in the province of British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: We have designed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle across 16 hospitals in the province of British Columbia in Canada. We will use the Knowledge to Action cycle to guide implementation and the RE-AIM framework to guide evaluation of the intervention bundle. The primary outcome will be the number of routine laboratory tests ordered per patient-day in the intervention versus control periods. Secondary outcome measures will assess implementation fidelity, number of all common laboratory tests used, impact on healthcare costs, and safety outcomes. The study will include patients admitted to adult medical wards (internal medicine or family medicine) and healthcare providers working in these wards within the participating hospitals. After a baseline period of 24 weeks, we will conduct a 16-week pilot at one hospital site. A new cluster (containing approximately 2-3 hospitals) will receive the intervention every 12 weeks. We will evaluate the sustainability of implementation at 24 weeks post implementation of the final cluster. Using intention to treat, we will use generalized linear mixed models for analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes. DISCUSSION: The study builds upon a multicomponent intervention bundle that has previously demonstrated effectiveness. The elements of the intervention bundle are easily adaptable to other settings, facilitating future adoption in wider contexts. The study outputs are expected to have a positive impact as they will reduce usage of repetitive laboratory tests and provide empirically supported measures and tools for accomplishing this work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered on April 8, 2024, via ClinicalTrials.gov Protocols Registration and Results System (NCT06359587). https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Humanos , Colúmbia Britânica , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Ciência da Implementação , Análise por Conglomerados
2.
EClinicalMedicine ; 31: 100675, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554080

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcal blood stream infections (SBSI) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, however there is little data on such infections in persons with HIV (PWH) in the combination antiretroviral therapy era, particularly when divided by species; methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS). METHODS: Using linked longitudinal clinical and microbiologic databases, all cases of SBSI in PWH accessing care at Southern Alberta Clinic were identified and demographic features and outcomes characterized. We compared participants with SBSI to those with no SBSI and determined the 1-year all-cause mortality following SBSI and longitudinally over the study period. FINDINGS: From 2000 to 2018, 130 SBSI occurred in 95 PWH over 21,526 patient-years follow-up. MSSA caused 38.4%, MRSA 26.1% and CoNS 35.3% of SBSI. Highest risks for SSBI were in Hepatitis C coinfection, low CD4 nadir, Indigenous/Metis ethnicity and in persons who use injection drugs (PWID). During follow-up, 423 deaths occurred in all PWH. Mortality rates for PWH with SBSI was 74.9/1000 patient-years (95% CI 59.2-94.9) compared with no SBSI 16.0/1000 patient-years (95% CI 14.4-17.7). The mortality Hazard Ratio was 2.61(95% CI 1.95-3.49, P= <0.001) for SBSI compared to no SBSI, following adjusting for confounding. Seventy deaths occurred in persons with SBSI with 40% in the first year. Higher 1-year mortality rates occurred in hospital-acquired infections. INTERPRETATION: Incidence rates of SBSI are high in PWH, with identified characteristics that further increase this risk. PWH who experience SBSI have a significant mortality risk within the first year of follow-up, however they also have greater long-term all-cause mortality compared to those with no SBSI. Further investigation is needed in PWH evaluating host, environment and pathogen differences that lead to differing rates of SBSI and mortality seen here. FUNDING: No funding was received for this work.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...