Incidence and outcomes of emergency intraprocedural surgical conversion during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from a large tertiary care centre.

OBJECTIVE: During a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) procedure, intraprocedural complications that are manageable only by conversion to emergency open-heart surgery (E-OHS) occasionally occur. Contemporary data on the incidence and outcome of TAVI patients undergoing E-OHS are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate early and midterm outcomes following E-OHS of patients undergoing TAVI in a large tertiary care centre with immediate surgical backup availability for all TAVI procedures over a 15-year period. METHODS: Data from all patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI between 2006 and 2020 at the Heart Centre Leipzig were analysed. The study time was divided into 3 periods: 2006-2010 (P1), 2011-2015 (P2) and 2016-2020 (P3). Patients were grouped according to their surgical risk (high risk: EuroSCORE II ≥ 6%; low/intermediate risk: EuroSCORE II <6%). Primary outcomes were intraprocedural and in-hospital death and 1-year survival. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 6903 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI. Among them, 74 (1.1%) required E-OHS [high risk, n = 66 (89.2%); low/intermediate risk, n = 8 (10.8%)]. The rate of patients requiring E-OHS was 3.5% (20/577 patients), 1.8% (35/1967 patients) and 0.4% (19/4359 patients) in study periods P1 to P3, respectively (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who had E-OHS who were low/intermediate risk increased considerably over time (P1:0%; P28.6%; P3:26.3%; P = 0.077). Intraprocedural deaths occurred in 10 patients (13.5%), all of whom were high-risk. In-hospital mortality was 62.1% in high-risk patients and 12.5% in low/intermediate risk patients (P = 0.007). One-year survival was 37.8% in all patients undergoing E-OHS, 31.8% in high-risk patients and 87.5% in low/intermediate risk patients (log-rank P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital and 1-year survival rates following E-OHS are higher in low/intermediate risk than in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI. An on-site cardiac surgical department with immediately available E-OHS capabilities is an important component of the TAVI team.

Early- and mid-term outcomes following redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the early- and mid-term outcomes after redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with previous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Retrospective single-centre analysis of early- and mid-term outcomes following redo SAVR in patients with previous TAVI between 2013 and 2020. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and mid-term survival. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 5756 patients underwent TAVI. Among them, 28 (0.5%) patients required redo SAVR after TAVI. During periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2020, 4/2184 (0.2%) patients and 24/3572 (0.7%) patients required SAVR after TAVI, respectively. The median logistic EuroSCORE was significantly higher at the time of SAVR than at the time of the index TAVI (5.9% vs 11.6%; P < 0.001). The median elapsed time between TAVI and redo SAVR was 7 months (3.5-14 months). Infective endocarditis (IE) was the most frequent indication for surgery [19 (67.8%) patients]. A total of 11 (39.3%) patients underwent isolated SAVR and 17 (60.7%) SAVR + additional cardiac surgical procedures. The overall in-hospital mortality was 14.3% (4/28). In-hospital mortality was 15.8% (3/19) among IE patients and 11.1% (1/9) among non-IE patients (P = 0.7). Overall estimated survival was 66.5%, 59.9% and 48.0% at 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. Patients with IE showed a trend towards a lower estimated mid-term survival compared to non-IE patients [41.6% (95% confidence interval: 22.0-78.0%) vs 58.3% (95% confidence interval: 30.0-100%) survival at 24 months (P = 0.3)]. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR can be successfully performed in patients with prior TAVI despite the increased surgical risk and technical difficulty. IE is associated with decreased mid-term survival.

Perceived Work Uncertainty and Creativity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Zhongyong and Creative Self-Efficacy.

Research on the relationship between work stress and employee creativity has been mixed. This study on 823 female attorneys in China identifies employee creative self-efficacy and employees' value of Zhongyong as moderators in this relationship. In this study, work stress is assessed by the perceived work uncertainty brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study found that although Zhongyong, which involves an employee's ambidextrous thinking, can be helpful for employee creativity, low levels of Zhongyong are better for employee creativity in an uncertain context such as the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the fact that high levels of Zhongyong result in an overemphasis on compromise and giving in when times are uncertain. Instead, low levels of Zhongyong will decrease employees' concern about others' acceptance in an uncertain environment. In addition, creative self-efficacy motivates employees to engage in creative efforts during times of work uncertainty. In sum, this study found that employee perceived work uncertainty brought on by COVID-19 enhances employee creativity when an employee's value of Zhongyong is low and creative self-efficacy is high.

Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: a group norms approach.

Although the relationship between unit-level organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and unit outcomes has been well established in recent years, the conceptual development of OCB at the unit level of analysis has not been adequately addressed. In an effort to fill this conceptual gap and to spur future research, the authors apply the literature on group norms to the concept of OCB. The resulting framework suggests a cyclical relationship between individual- and group-level processes and ultimately offers an explanation for how OCB norms are established and maintained in work groups. The authors demonstrate how this framework incorporates past research on the relationship between unit-level OCB and unit outcomes and how it extends previous research by suggesting multiple directions for future efforts related to unit-level OCB.