A randomised controlled trial of complete denture impression materials.

OBJECTIVES: There is continuing demand for non-implant prosthodontic treatment and yet there is a paucity of high quality Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) evidence for best practice. The aim of this research was to provide evidence for best practice in prosthodontic impressions by comparing two impression materials in a double-blind, randomised, crossover, controlled, clinical trial. METHODS: Eighty-five patients were recruited, using published eligibility criteria, to the trial at Leeds Dental Institute, UK. Each patient received two sets of dentures; made using either alginate or silicone impressions. Randomisations determined the order of assessment and order of impressions. The primary outcome was patient blinded preference for unadjusted dentures. Secondary outcomes were patient preference for the adjusted dentures, rating of comfort, stability and chewing efficiency, experience of each impression, and an OHIP-EDENT questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (91.8%) patients completed the primary assessment. 53(67.9%) patients preferred dentures made from silicone impressions while 14(17.9%) preferred alginate impressions. 4(5.1%) patients found both dentures equally satisfactory and 7 (9.0%) found both equally unsatisfactory. There was a 50% difference in preference rates (in favour of silicone) (95%CI 32.7-67.3%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is significant evidence that dentures made from silicone impressions were preferred by patients. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Given the strength of the clinical findings within this paper, dentists should consider choosing silicone rather than alginate as their material of choice for secondary impressions for complete dentures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 01528038. This article forms part of a project for which the author (TPH) won the Senior Clinical Unilever Hatton Award of the International Assocation for Dental Research, Capetown, South Africa, June 2014.

Multiple origins of the mtDNA 7472insC mutation associated with hearing loss and neurological dysfunction.

Several mtDNA mutations have been reported in families with both syndromic and non-syndromic hearing loss. One such mutation is the heteroplasmic 7472insC in the tRNA(Ser(UCN)) gene which has been found in six families, all from Western Europe. However, it was not clear if this distribution was due to a common founder effect or chance sampling of several unrelated families, the 7472insC mutation having occurred multiple times. Haplotype analysis of all six families supports the latter notion. This confirms the pathogenicity of the 7472insC mutation and suggests it may exist in other populations where it may prove to be a small but significant cause of hearing loss, particularly when neurological symptoms are also present.