Thromboembolism and Oral Contraceptives During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Disproportionality Analysis Within the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events (TEs) are known to be a severe complication for COVID-19. They are associated with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with coagulation cascade activation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine a potential association between the COVID-19 pandemic and the increment of the risk of suspected TEs in women on systemic hormonal contraceptives (SHCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study utilised a case/non-case approach in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database, which includes more than 290,000 cases of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated during an initial pandemic period in 2020 compared with a pre-pandemic period in 2019 and an additional control period in 2018. RESULTS: While there was a decreased number of ADR notifications for any medications and for any type of ADR in patients on SHCs during the pandemic period, the TE ROR for all SHCs was higher in the 2020 pandemic period [ROR = 11.8 (5.6-24.7)] relative to the pre-pandemic period in 2019 [ROR = 6.3 (3.2-12.5)] and the additional control period in 2018 [ROR = 4.6. (2.1-9.9)]. In contrast, ROR for progestogen-only contraceptives was lower during the pandemic as compared with the two control periods. CONCLUSION: The reported disproportionality of TEs in women on SHCs rose during the pandemic period. This suggests a potential interaction of the drug (SHC) with COVID-19, which led to an increased risk of TEs in women exposed to both factors. This should be taken into consideration in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Notificación de sospechas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos por enfermeras en España. Un estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo / Reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by nursing in Spain. An observational-descriptive retrospective study

Objetivo: Conocer el grado de participación de las enfermeras en la notificación espontánea de sospechas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos (RAM) al Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia de Medicamentos de Uso Humano (SEFV-H), describir las características principales de los casos notificados e identificar puntos de mejora. Método: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo a partir de la información contenida en la base de datos FEDRA del SEFV-H. Se tomaron como muestra las notificaciones espontáneas de las RAM realizadas por enfermeras durante los seis primeros meses del 2018. Resultados: De las 6.370 sospechas de RAM notificadas por profesionales sanitarios en el periodo considerado, tan solo un 4,8% fueron realizadas por enfermeras. El 62,7% procede de centros extrahospitalarios y la mayoría de las RAM son consideradas no graves (78%). Las reacciones notificadas con más frecuencia son las reacciones locales. Los pacientes más implicados son los niños y las vacunas los medicamentos más notificados (58,3%), seguidas de los contrastes intravenosos para la realización de pruebas diagnósticas. Conclusiones: Las enfermeras notifican muy pocos casos al SEFV-H y están en su mayoría relacionados con la administración de vacunas y son enviados por enfermeras que trabajan en el medio extrahospitalario. La mayoría de los casos no presentan gravedad y suelen referir reacciones adversas conocidas para el fármaco sospechoso. Esta infranotificación observada plantea la necesidad de promover la formación en materia de farmacovigilancia entre estas enfermeras notificadoras para que continúen notificando, y también a las que no lo hacen en su práctica diaria, para que puedan comenzar a hacerlo.(AU)

Objective: This study aimed to gain knowledge of the nurses’ involvement in the spontaneous report of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Medicinal Products for Human Use (SEFV-H), describing the principal characteristics of the reported cases, identifying points of improvement. Methods: A descriptive observational retrospective study was based on the data from FEDRA, the database created by the SEFV-H. The sample taken was the spontaneous adverse drug reactions reported to SEFV-H by nurses during the first 6 months of the 2018. Results: Complete data was provided by 6,370 suspicions of ADR reported to SEFV-H by all healthcare professionals. Only 4,8% of the samples were taken by nurses, 62,7% came from medical centers. The majority of the ADR were not considered a serious disease (78%). The most frequently adverse drug reactions reported by nurses were local reactions. The patients most involved were children and vaccines were the most reported drugs (58,3%), followed by the intravenous contrast agents used in diagnostic tests. Conclusions: Nurses report very few cases to SEFV-H and are mostly related to the administration of vaccines and are sent by nurses working in the out-of-hospital setting. Most cases are not serious and usually report known adverse reactions to the suspected drug. This observed under-notification raises the need to promote increased pharmacovigilance training among these notifying nurses so that they can continue to report, and also for those who do not do so in their daily practice, so that they can begin to do so.(AU)

Reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by nursing in Spain. An observational-descriptive retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain knowledge of the nurses' involvement in the spontaneous report of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Medicinal Products for Human Use (SEFV-H), describing the principal characteristics of the reported cases, identifying points of improvement. METHODS: A descriptive observational retrospective study was based on the data from FEDRA, the database created by the SEFV-H. The sample taken was the spontaneous adverse drug reactions reported to SEFV-H by nurses during the first 6 months of the 2018. RESULTS: Complete data was provided by 6,370 suspicions of ADR reported to SEFV-H by all healthcare professionals. Only 4,8% of the samples were taken by nurses, 62,7% came from medical centers. The majority of the ADR were not considered a serious disease (78%). The most frequently adverse drug reactions reported by nurses were local reactions. The patients most involved were children and vaccines were the most reported drugs (58,3%), followed by the intravenous contrast agents used in diagnostic tests. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses report very few cases to SEFV-H and are mostly related to the administration of vaccines and are sent by nurses working in the out-of-hospital setting. Most cases are not serious and usually report known adverse reactions to the suspected drug. This observed under-notification raises the need to promote increased pharmacovigilance training among these notifying nurses so that they can continue to report, and also for those who do not do so in their daily practice, so that they can begin to do so.

Reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by nursing in Spain. An observational-descriptive retrospective study. / Notificación de sospechas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos por enfermeras en España. Un estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain knowledge of the nurses' involvement in the spontaneous report of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Medicinal Products for Human Use (SEFV-H), describing the principal characteristics of the reported cases, identifying points of improvement. METHODS: A descriptive observational retrospective study was based on the data from FEDRA, the database created by the SEFV-H. The sample taken was the spontaneous adverse drug reactions reported to SEFV-H by nurses during the first 6 months of the 2018. RESULTS: Complete data was provided by 6,370 suspicions of ADR reported to SEFV-H by all healthcare professionals. Only 4,8% of the samples were taken by nurses, 62,7% came from medical centers. The majority of the ADR were not considered a serious disease (78%). The most frequently adverse drug reactions reported by nurses were local reactions. The patients most involved were children and vaccines were the most reported drugs (58,3%), followed by the intravenous contrast agents used in diagnostic tests. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses report very few cases to SEFV-H and are mostly related to the administration of vaccines and are sent by nurses working in the out-of-hospital setting. Most cases are not serious and usually report known adverse reactions to the suspected drug. This observed under-notification raises the need to promote increased pharmacovigilance training among these notifying nurses so that they can continue to report, and also for those who do not do so in their daily practice, so that they can begin to do so.

Bullous pemphigoid associated with the use of dipeptidil peptidase-4 inhibitors: analysis from studies based on pharmacovigilance databases.

Background Bullous pemphigoid has been associated to dipeptidase-4 inhibitors. Objectives Addressing the potential Bullous pemphigoid-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors association based on pharmacovigilance data currently available in Spain in order to obtain a composite disproportionality estimator from all the data generated by the case-non case studies conducted to this date. Setting The Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs database. Method Case-non case study based on the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs notifications submitted between 2007 and 2018 (n = 169,280), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term (Preferred Term) 'pemphigoid' for sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin (n = 1952). As negative control, we used acetaminophen, while furosemide was the positive control. A pooled reported odds ratio analysis in the French, Japanese, and Spanish national pharmacovigilance databases was performed. On The Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs, we conducted a bullous pemphigoid-metformin association analysis within the period 1982-2018. Main outcome measure Adverse reaction cases in pharmacovigilance databases and the disproportionality through the reporting odds ratio. Results Within The Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs, we found 45 cases of bullous pemphigoid in dipeptidase-4 inhibitors patients. Median age was 77 years (range 72-82). The median latency period was 7 months (range 0.23-86). The Bullous pemphigoid-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors association was established with a reporting odd ratio = 70.0 (95% confidence intervals 49.1-10.1). In the combined analysis of the three aforementioned pharmacovigilance databases, the pooled reporting odd ratio was 81.0 (95% confidence intervals 69.5-94.4). Conclusion The composite estimator for the three national pharmacovigilance databases yields clear evidence of a Bullous pemphigoid-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors association, which was statistically significant for both the pharmacological class as a whole and each of the dipeptidase-4 inhibitors agents under investigation. Metformin's role in the incidence of bullous pemphigoid appeared casual rather than causal. No differences between Caucasian and Asian populations were noted.

Atypical Fracture of the Sternum After Long-Term Alendronate Plus Cholecalciferol Treatment: A Case Report.

A 55-year-old woman developed an atraumatic sternum fracture during treatment with alendronate for osteoporosis. The woman received alendronate 70 mg in combination with cholecalciferol 5600 IU once weekly, as well as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. After 4 years of treatment, following a dorsal flexion with no direct thoracic trauma, the patient suffered a fracture of the sternum, with an X-ray revealing sternal body fracture. This fracture was seen to be transverse, noncomminuted and without displacement. Magnetic resonance imaging was carried out to rule out the presence of either a pathological fracture or a fracture resulting from osteoporotic fragility, and showed a triple sternal fracture involving the body, as well as the upper and lower manubrium of the sternum. This fracture presented the features of an atypical femur fracture, except for the location. The alendronate and cholecalciferol combination was discontinued and denosumab was prescribed. After the withdrawal of alendronate, the patient showed clinical improvement, with a decrease in pain, and is currently having routine checkups. The causality algorithm of the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System shows a score of 5, indicating a possible relationship between the patient's sternum fracture and her use of the suspect drug (Naranjo scale 6 = probable).